For Delhi riots wikipedia squarely blames Hindus while kingpin "Tahir Hussain" is a Muslim while on the contrary for Bangalore riots they don't want to name the religion of the rioters, while the religion of rioters is very much evident, therefore, I neither want to give shape, purpose and momentum to such communal and arrogant organisation nor I want them to fit in my life until and unless they mend their ways hence I want my money back.
Young Indian students who read Wikipedia for gaining knowledge would ever know the true picture the source has editors who are anti-India and sympathetic to Pakistan who ensure that the story is nowhere close to neutral?