Thursday, October 24, 2024
Home Blog Page 828

Bhakts or haters, who will win?

0

From last two years, people in the country can clearly be seen divided either in extreme favour or against PM Narendra Modi. Their talks and thoughts have become Modi centric. India now witnesses division of people on the basis of ‘Modi Bhakts’ or ‘Modi haters’. These two classes are brand new and irritating too! The most interesting fact is that even in a family too, this discrimination is clearly evident. People of any family are divided when it comes to Modi and that is producing an altogether different picture of Indian society. There arise some very crucial questions which need to be answered.

Who are Bhakts and haters?

‘Bhakts’ as they are said notoriously, are the ones who are believed to be the blind supporters of PM Modi. They are supposed to accept and support each and everything Modi or BJP says and every policy/law formulated by Modi government seems to be a ‘shloka’ from Gita to them. They declare every policy of Modi government incorrigible without careful and unbiased examination just because it is formulated by their almighty. They do not spare any platform to celebrate any successful or unsuccessful policy of the Modi government, appreciate any step taken by government, they trend right from twitter to facebook to roads and are sometimes nasty to handle.

On the other hand, haters are the part of that herd of people who refer to themselves as ‘intellectuals’. They seem to be the only ones who want to save mother India from the wicked assaults of monster Modi. Alike bhakts they also can be seen anywhere, be it facebook or twitter, to overtly oppose any policy of Modi government, that too not by unbiased critical examination but just because of their personal hate or disguise they share with Modi. These haters face constant atrocities and altercations with bhakts in a futile battle to prove Modi right or wrong.

Why this trend has got a buzz?

The trend of hate or blind faith in the prime leader of the country is not very new, in fact, in the backdrop, other leaders such as Atal Bihari Vajpayee, Indira Gandhi and others also had to face this contrast from masses but now due to the advent of social media platforms, people feel free to express anything and everything which strikes their mind and almost eleven crore Indian population can react to it(this is the number of Indians active on social media platforms), making social media a hot site for both Bhakts and haters. Moreover, besides social media, the extremism is served by political parties and their activists themselves. They trap many innocent people in bait of penny and on their behalf spread whatever is in favour of their respective parties. Many instances of paid news, tweets and posts on social media could be noticed and a sniff of support by political parties is evident of the fact that it is political parties and their leaders behind the curtains who are happy go lucky with the extremism going on in the country.

In search of other probable reasons, we cannot ignore the fact that after an eternally long time, finally people have got a PM to talk about. His precedent, who reigned for ten boring years was actually not enticing to people because he did not talk too much, neither he boasted too much, moreover he was inarticulate and lacked independency as complained by people. Modi has got every feature which titillates bhakts and at the same time is repugnant to haters. He is the most verbose leader world has ever seen which arises the feeling of extremism in people. One more reason which cannot be overlooked is that after thirty long years, any political party was able to clinch full majority on its own, that too not because party leaders had improved dramatically, but because of its PM candidate. So it is obvious that the huge support behind him was provided by bhakts and that support is astir even today. It seems like the ‘bhakti’ and hate is going to continue at least till 2019.

What comprises of Bhakts and haters?

Actually, Bhakts and haters are new evolution but their gestation goes back to the time when Modi was the chief minister of Gujarat, his stint as Gujarat CM for twelve and a half years has shown his capabilities as a leader and the development that has allegedly taken place in Gujarat in those years has attracted many ones. Those supporters in these years have grown more violent, more supportive than ever and after his aggressive campaign in 2014, many have transformed from supporters to bhakts. These bhakts includes activists of BJP, hard core supporters of Modi, haters of congress and Rahul Gandhi, also the ones who live in dreams are Bhakts!

Talking about haters many people who think that the defaced side of Gujarat at the time when Modi was CM has not been properly shown, those who still cannot recover from 2002 riots and think they happened because of Modi, those who think Modi is a dictator, supporters of political parties other than BJP and specially supporters of Aam Admi Party have reserved their seats in hater’s quota.

Nowadays, many eminent personalities, many film stars and prize winners have supported or rejected Modi because of his strict and bitter decisions; they have accused him of being affected with overconfidence and ignorance of others.

Keeping religion as a point of view in mind, Hindus have particularly supported Modi more than people belonging to any other religion and they are the ones who have much hastily transformed in bhakts, other minorities and Muslims in particular have turned their back to Modi because they have conception in their minds that Modi cares more about Hindus in particular. Earlier they opposed Modi but they are haters now.

Should one be either Bhakt or hater?

Bhakts and haters show intense feelings and they are emotionally driven. They are full of emotions, not thoughts while they discuss any policy of Modi government. They support and oppose any policy by government just because Modi is included in it, not on its merit. Amidst of this entire tumultuous contest, they have forgotten their nation. They have forgotten that nation is greater and more important than a person. They listen to any policy, any decision by the government with biased perception. People have lost rational arguments and are just finding ways of how to make their opponents run out of words. They are chuffed with verbal victories, not logical one. They have become aggressive, lost their modesty which has affected their thinking and critical analysis of any policy of government. Moreover they have become intolerant of any other’s views and are not ready to even listen to others. They use word play, vulgar and every other thing they must not do. People should understand that leaders will come and go, parties will win and lose but the nation is a constant entity.

http://twitter.com/itisSK

https://www.facebook.com/itissktheblogger/

https://shubhamk97.wordpress.com

Conversations with a Modi hater

0

This post “Psychology of a Modi hater” by @arigold reminded of a few conversations of my own with such folks in recent past with colleagues, friends and neighbours. Over past few years, I always found Modi haters to be either traditional/ex-Congress supporters who are too embarrassed now to support Congress publicly (and at times- turned AAP supporters) or folks just genetically wired to secular definitions. But, there is also a big brigade out there – which is just confused and clueless.

Below I narrate a re-creation of few such conversations.

A: OMG! This man is scary. He has made life hell with his crazy ideas.
Me: So you are troubled by demonetization. Hmmm… You shouldn’t have shunned those credit cards/smartphones.

A: No, its not about me. But my maid, driver, Press-wala, Dhobi, grocer – they are all struggling to survive.
Does Modi give a damn for the poor?
Me: Oh! So thoughtful of you! But this fig leaf is many weeks old and shriveled now. Got anything fresh?

A: Sorry, you maybe a Bhakt. But I don’t like him. The way he talks, they way he dresses, they way he speaks. WTF is this 56- inch, Munh-todd’ jawab. Such loud language doesn’t behoove a PM.
Me: So you love a PM who is mute and needs high command approval before opening his lips? What is wrong with what he has said, anyways.. Can you elaborate a bit please?

A: No! See, a PM cannot be threatening a neighbour like that. India is not a rogue nation. We can not threaten neighbours!
Me: errr… chapter, section, verse please? Which edict/psalm/rule/law says that India must silently take brutal hits and revert only by sending dossiers? Do you want a country which every Tom, Dick, Harry treats like a punching bag? Piss on and walk way! Have you even noticed how Modi single handedly changed the equations in SAARC, and for that matter across ASEAN and the rest of world for India in last 24+ months? Does respect as a nation mean anything to you?

A: Well.. I do acknowledge that he’s working hard. But more than him, I can’t stand all the others around him. He is a one-man show.
Me: Yeah… sure. One man show! Have you even seen the names in his cabinet. Parrikar has transformed defense and its spending single-handedly, after a decade long comatose. Sushma runs a lean machine even from her hospital bed. Have you taken a train since Suresh Prabhu took over railways? Do you even have a clue of how Gadkari has put infrastructure buildouts in highways/waterways on steroids in last two years? Or Piyush Goyal bringing coal/power sector back from grave to a situation of zero-coal-import in under 2 years? Or the LED revolution he has driven throughout India – in time lesser than it took you to decide how and when to repaint your appartment? Or voluntary elimination of LPG subsidy, end of urea leakages, unprecedented expansion of LPG cover to BPL families, expansion of banking network, financial inclusion and zillion other things done by his team in last 2 years?

A: yes! His ministers are work hard too. Doing lots. But, what about those saffron guys? That Sadhavi or VHP guys. Why can’t Modi shut them up?
Me: Sure. Modi can shut everyone up. Muzzle everyone, jail everyone. You and me too. And you would be the first one to cry “Fascism”, “Modi is a dictator”, “Where is free speech” Remember that drama? Or is free speech only for folks in studios’ and wine drinkers at IIC?

A: Whatever! I can not support BJP. I am an army-kid. I have been brought up in a secular environment. I can not support a party that talks of Hindutva and such stuff. That’s communal and divisive. India cannot be ruled like this (not kidding! this army-kid thing. This is a real argument by a colleague!)
Me: Your blinkers are too coloured and conditioned- its pointless elaborating to you what Hindutva means or how secularism has been abused in India. Or how communal laws have been bleeding Hindus and Hindus alone. Be it RTE, ownership of temples and rituals or vote bank politics in general. But hey- Divisive? Only Modi-effect I have seen so far is unification of most bitter enemies… Nitish allied with Lalu, Mamata pally with Communists now. Kejriwal may even adopt Shiela Dixit as Godmother anytime now. If any, Modi has proven to be a great unifier. Only thing I see is – Modi slogging endlessly with a vision and a mission. For over two years, umpteen milestones & initiatives and not a speck of doubt or charge on him. Just relentless execution!

A: Well, I agree he is honest. He is working extremely hard too… But sorry, I can not vote for him. I am secular.
But, anyways – my vote should not matter! Most folks I see around me support him! Its ok for me not to. He will win anyways!
Me: Really? Do you even understand how the electoral maths works in India? And what makes you think ‘everyone else’ supports him. There are quite many educated seculars like you out there. In 2014, a mere 30% odd voted for Modi. At least 60% did not for his alliance. It is just a matter of time and Bihar/ Delhi like alliances, arithmetic and smart arithmetic/transfer of votes for the remainder to kick him out. And that will give you back the great miserable mess we have had for seven decades.

A: Whatever you say. Anyone but Modi! India must think beyond just one man.
Me: Actually, you are right. India is too big and great to just follow one man.  You opened my eyes! I am ready to support a party/leader other than Modi – for PM in 2019. Heck! It late already. We must begin campaign/support for him/her right away. Tell me who? Who is the leader you deem ready/fit to lead India in 2019? Enlighten me!

A: Hmmm. Errrr. Well! Shucks! OMG! I forgot. I am late for my next meeting. Bye!

Remonetisation: Solving the Currency Conundrum

0

There could hardly be anyone in the country today who is not aware about the demonetization of the old Rs.1000 and Rs.500 notes. Its effect could perhaps have been easily managed by a smaller set of the Indian population who could quickly switch over to alternate means of paying for their transactions but those who were used to transacting only with cash were severely affected. Either way the lingering question in everybody’s mind is how long more it will take to overcome the currency crisis and will the government be able to successfully remonetize without having to wait too long after the 50 day deadline is over on 30th December 2016. Well, read on to get the answer to this most intriguing question!

As per an RTI query, RBI had 247 crores of Rs.2000 notes in stock as on 8th November 2016 which were printed exclusively in the 2 RBI presses at Salboni in West Bengal and Mysuru in Karnataka under Bharatiya Reserve Bank Note Mudran (BRBNMPL). Given the stated combined capacity of 4 crore notes per day, it would have taken around 62 days to print this quantity. This helps us conclude that the printing of the Rs.2000 notes which has Dr. Urjit Patel’s signature should have been started within a day or two of him assuming charge on 4th September.

Out of the 247 crore Rs. 2000 notes that were available before the announcement of demonetization, only 170 crore have been issued to the public till 10th December as per RBI’s notification on 13th December. It is safe to assume that BRBNMPL would have continued to print these notes till the end of November. Hence till the month end, they would have printed another 96 crore notes over 24 days taking the total to 343 crore notes, the exact number to replace the 685.8 crore Rs.1000 notes issued to public. If the RBI was not keen to replace full value of Rs.1000 notes, printing of Rs.2000 notes would have ended much earlier. It appears that they worked under normal shifts during November.

In the meanwhile, the 2 presses in Nashik and Dewas under Security Printing and Minting Corporation of India Ltd (SPMCIL), which were earlier printing Rs.100 and smaller denominations were switched over to printing new Rs.500 notes exclusively, in view of the emergency situation caused by the non-availability of these notes vital for handing the currency shortage. As per claims, they started with a combined capacity of just 90 lakhs notes per day and in that also some quality issues surfaced. It means that in 17-18 days starting 9th November till 27th November, about 15-16 crore Rs.500 notes would have been printed. This could indirectly be confirmed, the figure of 15.6 notes issued till 29th November as stated in Rajya Sabha by the Minister of State for Finance Mr.Arjun Ram Meghwal. Here it is important to note that Mr.Jagdis Godse, the Secretary of CNP-ISP Workers’ Union has claimed that their employees have been working non-stop, including holidays, since the announcement of demonetization.

Further, around the end of November the quality issues seem to have been addressed and they have managed to increase the daily printing of Rs.500 notes to at least 1.5 crore notes and at the same time have been printing smaller denomination notes also. This should have been possible by employing 3 shifts per days and technical tweaks. This means an addition of around 32-35 crore notes over 21 days starting from 28th November till 18th December.

Going forward, as per SPMCIL, they manage to increase the output of Rs.500 notes to 2.2 crore notes per day by 23rd December and further to 2.65 cores by 27th December. Making some assumptions, this leads us to a figure of 32 core additional Rs.500 notes till the last day of December 2016 taking the total of these notes to 82 crores or 4.7% of the cancelled notes of the same denomination. No detail of issue of notes of higher denomination has been made available by RBI for the days after 19th December.

There are three other interesting possibilities to be considered:

  1. One can assume that the 2 units in Salboni and Mysuru were also pressed into printing Rs.500 notes exclusively from 1st December onwards. Also they were learnt to have extended the shift to 12 hours for 2 weeks between 14-27th in Salboni. A conservative estimate would give us about 120 crore additional notes.
  2. As per RBI’s notification on 21st December, they had issued 2,040 crore notes of Rs.100, Rs.50, Rs.20 and Rs.10 till 19th December. The stated capacity for the Nasik and Dewas units were around 1.1 notes per day for these denominations. It implies that RBI had most of these in stock on the day of announcing the demonetization. Alternatively, they could have released the soiled notes that they had kept aside for destruction. Also extrapolating the information available their total value would not exceed Rs.1,16,000 crores in all.
  3. The same notification states that till 19th December, 220 crore notes of higher denominations were issued. Assuming that no more Rs.500 note was issued after 29th November (total issued 15.6 crores), RBI should have issued 204.4 crore notes of Rs.2000 till 19th December taking the total value of the higher denomination notes to a maximum of Rs.4,16,600 crores. Hence there would be an unexplained shortfall of Rs.60,000 crores in the total value Rs.5,92,613 cores of all denominations issued, as mentioned in this notification.

Putting all these things together, we get these conservative figures (in crores):

Denomination of Bank notes Printed till 31st December 2016 Issued till 19 December 2016 Available for distribution from 20-Dec till 31-Dec
Number Cr Value Rs. Cr Number Cr Value Rs. Cr Number Cr Value Rs. Cr
Rs.2000    343.00   6,86,000     204.40  4,08,800    138.60  2,77,200
Rs.500   200.00   1,00,000        15.60        7,800    184.40     92,200
Rs.100 & below 2,040.00   1,16,000

The above figures make us conclude that RBI would be in a position to replace the banned notes to the tune of around 9,00,000 crores by the end of December 2016, which would make 58.4% of Rs.15,44,050 crores which is the total value of banned notes issued to the public. Clearly, the replacement of banned Rs500 is not happening by an equivalent replacement but by adding a substantial quantity of notes of smaller denominations.

It will look like RBI has a huge gap of 41.5% to bridge. But what if the RBI never wanted to close this gap fully? Interesting isn’t it? Well, chances are RBI will reach its target not very long from now, belying the expectation of a failure of the demonetization exercise by those who are opposing it!

ईमानदार की अफीम

0

लोग बोलते हैं कि demonetization का असर नहीं हुआ, तो आप गैर जरूरी चीजों की बिक्री देख लीजिये, आज ब्लैक वाले कैश नहीं होने के कारण भोग-विलास के सामान नहीं खरीद पा रहे हैं, महंगे मोबाइल की बिक्री आधी रह गयी है। मार्केटिंग की झोंक से बिकने वाले उत्पाद मार खा रहे हैं और ये सबूत है कि चोर-रईस आज सकपकाए हुए हैं, यदि इन लोगों ने पुरानी लाइफस्टाइल अपनाई तो पकड़ मे आ जाएंगे, क्योंकि कार्ड निकालने पड़ेंगे, चेक देने पड़ेंगे और यहाँ सरकार की रेडार पकड़ लेगी। वहीं सैलरी वाला या ईमानदार-रईस खुशी-खुशी ऑनलाइन या कार्ड से मोबाइल आदि खरीद रहा है, उसने इकॉनमी सम्हाली हुई है।

कुछ-एक रिसर्च है जिसमें भारत की 50-60% इकॉनमी को ब्लैक मनी आधारित माना गया है। सवाल ये है कि 60% इकॉनमी अगर बदमाशों के हाथ थी तो 40% को क्या था कि वो टैक्स भरते रहे? आखिर ईमानदारी का चस्का क्यों था? खैर, कारण चाहे भगवान हो या ईमान हो, मन ही मन ये 40% आज खुश है। जितनी बार लाइन लगेगा उतनी बार इसका सीना चौड़ा होगा। ईमानदार आदमी को त्याग मे भी बड़ा संतोष मिलता है, और संतोष पाकर ईमानदार हाइ हो जाता है। संतोष ईमानदार की अफीम है, और वो मोदी जी ने 8 नवंबर से भर भर के बांटी है।

भले ही ईमानदार के पास एक भी न्यूज़ चैनल नहीं है, इसके पास अमर्त्य सेन जैसे एकोनोमिस्ट नहीं हैं। इसका कोई नेता या पार्टी नहीं है लेकिन इसको ये नोट बदलने का कार्यक्र्म जच गया है। आम जनता को कैश का गोरखधंधा बताने के लिए कोई रॉकेट साइन्स नहीं मांगता है। आम जनता सब जानता है, लेकिन आम ईमानदार जनता को इज्जत मांगता है। जिंदगी भर जो ईमानदारी का उलाहना सुना उसका हिसाब बराबर होना मांगता है। और विमुद्रीकरण ने आज हिसाब करके दिया है। ईमानदार व्यापारी की बिक्री बढ़ी है, ईमानदार के खाली खाते मे लोग आकर पैसा डाल रहे हैं और वो भरपूर इतरा रहा है, लेकिन संतोष वाला चस्का है इसलिए एहसानपूर्वक खाते मे पैसा डलवा भी रहा है।

इस मामले को थोड़ा संगठन शास्त्र से भी समझिए। अबकी बार मोदी जी ने एक कार्यक्रम देकर आदमी से भाषणबाजी या पान के गल्ले पर बकर-भंजन के अलावा लाइन मे लगने का जमीनी काम भी करवा दिया है, इसलिए अब ये इंसान केवल प्रशंसक नहीं रह गया, अब ये आदमी कार्यकर्ता हो गया है। अब ये आदमी ईमानदारी कि धुन मे मोदी के लिए चुनाव लड़ेगा। भले भाजपा के कुछ नेता उनकी लुटिया डूबने की वजह से गरम-ठंडे हो रहे हों। आज मोदी जी का वोट बैंक 28% से ऊपर आ गया है, 40% कि ओर बढ़ गया है।

इसलिए ईमानदारों से निवेदन है कि कृपया आज के हालत पर गंभीरता से भिड़े रहें, लाइन मे लगे हुए अपने भाई को कोई बेवकूफ न बना ले जाए। जब तक हम cashless नहीं हो जाते, तब तक कि लंबी लड़ाई पूरे असलहे से लड़ना है, किसी भी कारण से नहीं रुकना है। नशा उतरने न पाये।

A toast to all my fellow Indians

0

The fifty days since the announcement of Demonetization was made, are nearly up. Since then we have had economists of every hue weighing in on the pros and cons and possible outcomes; politicians, mostly opposing the move, have agitated on the streets and blocked Parliament and the media has been busy chasing every morbid story that can even remotely be linked to the noteban.

But what of the ordinary Indians who have actually borne the brunt of the ban? About a fortnight ago, a Twitter poll asked which group of Indians was most irritating. I had unhesitatingly clicked on the ‘Indians in general’ option. And it’s true; we might just be the most irritating race in the world. We are loud, opiniated, argumentative and venal. We have neither civic sense nor respect for public spaces littering, spitting and peeing in public without any qualms. The less said about our traffic sense or rather lack of it, the better. We’d rather bribe our way or trade on our connections to get out of waiting our turn or paying a fine. And on a grim note, we remain deeply divided along regional, caste and religious lines.

I could go on and on. But the post-ban scenario has stood many of my notions on their head! For days on end, the same people have stood stoically in serpentine lines in a way that would put even the phlegmatic British, inured to queuing up, to shame. People who resorted to riots and arson at the slightest rumour of affront to religion or caste have staunchly resisted attempts by politicians to stir trouble by claiming victimhood. Our sense of humour and creativity has come to the fore; we have been kept entertained by an endless stream of jokes, cartoons and WhatsApp forwards. My personal favourite is the spoof on the famous Gabbar Singh dialogue ‘kitne aadmi the?’ from Sholay. And, of course, it has once again shown us the power of Indian ‘jugaad’. We have managed to carry on with the help of credit/IOUs/barter and what have you apart from the conventional credit/debit cards & mobile wallets. We have taken our fellow Indians on trust, believing that they will redeem their debts once the situation normalises. And who could have imagined the ease with which we seem to have leaped over the Digital chasm to the land of ‘less cash’ nirvana?

It has been amazing to see everyone from our autowala, sabziwala and chaatwala to Dada-Dadi, Chacha-Chachi and even chunnu- munnu and our Shantabai & Baburao take to digital payments like ducks to water. Various Govt agencies/NGOs, political leaders, bureaucrats, corporates and samaritans have taken the initiative to spread the gospel of less cash with missionary zeal. One can’t also forget the near super human contribution of our banking staff and Treasury and our law enforcement agencies. And all those responsible for getting our cash from the presses to our banks/ATMs. Yes, there have been the ungodly few among us who have tried to cheat the system but they are the exception that prove the rule. It has made me proud that when it comes to matters of National interest we can and do rise above our petty differences and personal hardships and contribute as one people. It has also been an eye opener for me that an overwhelming number of Indians would rather be honest. We only need simple, easy to comply with laws which are seen to be fairly applied to all and leaders who lead by example.

I’m not an economist so I can’t hazard a guess as to what will be the effect of demonetization on our economy. There are the other obvious effects like bringing down the drug trade, trafficking, terrorism, Maoism and counterfeiting. But apart from those, it has bound us all in a moral endeavour to forge for ourselves a more transparent, fair and equitable system.

I therefore propose a toast, “Here’s to all my fellow Indians and the success of demonetization”.

How a Jan-Dhan account changed the life of an ISB Graduate

0

Sitting in plush AC class rooms, living off luxurious apartments on campus and then subsequently working from swanky offices in big Corporates or self-owned companies, the ‘elite’ of our country, represented in this case by a graduate from ISB (Indian School of Business), is as far removed from reality of a Mamooli-Aadmi as the sky is from earth (not using ‘Aam-Aadmi’ as I find the term abused beyond redemption). Yet, it would not stop this elite from waxing eloquent on the problems of the poor living in distant villages or writing consulting papers on rural economy or perhaps even drafting critical public policy documents for the rural folk.

Please do not ponder much on the ISB grad in question – it’s me. And let me make a confession here – ‘ISB,’ has been added in here only to help gather more attention and more ‘eye-balls.’ Who would read a post from a nobody called Ashish, otherwise. Also, ISB can easily be replaced with any premier institution of India- IIT, IIM and others.

Having worked in my family business, I was never as far removed from reality as many of my other class mates were. However, I too still lived in an urban cocoon of my own. And this, I came to realize only after I started an industrial unit in a rural area and came face to face with rural life.

Looking at the difficulty faced by the labourers working in my unit (most of them come from UP & Orissa) in transferring money back home, I got Bank Accounts opened for them in a nearby bank, way back in 2014 when PM Modi was running the Jan Dhan Yojana. Life, or at least money transfers, would become easy for them, or so I thought.

The very next day of opening the bank accounts, my main foreman Ranjeet, an extremely intelligent & skilled worksman, came running to me – scared as hell.  “What wrong have I done done Sir (Saahab, humau kachu kiye hai kya)?” he asked showing an SMS he received from the bank. The SMS by itself was a simple Welcome message that any bank sends out on opening of an account but it was in English, a language which was beyond comprehension for this ‘Mamooli – Aadmi.’ Awe of the entire banking system exaggerated by a foreign language was such that a simple SMS scared the wits out of this otherwise reasonable and very balanced man. The ‘Urban Cocoon’ or, should I say, the ‘Urban English Cocoon’ in which I lived, broke open in that one moment.

In that one moment, I realized the injustice that we as a nation have been perpetrating on the ‘Mamooli Aadmi’ for all these years. 70 years after Independence from the ‘Angrez,’ we are still not able to give a person the right to go on with his life’s mundane, daily transactions without ‘Angrezi.’ Think about it, would you be comfortable to receive your phone bill, electricity bill, water bill, bank statement, judicial proceedings etc. all in a language you do not understand in your native country? What makes it worse is that we, the so called ‘educated’ elite, do not even see this as a problem that needs correction. On the contrary, we castigate the mamooli aadmi for not having the aptitude to learn English.

I, myself for instance, never employed even a security guard if he couldn’t write in English. However, after this incident, life changed. Language was no longer a barrier. My security guards started writing the ‘inward/ outward register’ in their native language Telugu and my foremen started writing the ‘production-logs’ in their native language Hindi (See attached pictures). Two years since then, Ranjeet, the security guards and most other workers continue to work with me. But now they work free of the inferiority complex, of not knowing an alien language and work with more confidence, zeal, motivation & loyalty. A simple change in the language of work brought about much greater peace, prosperity and happiness both for me and my workers.

I now wonder how much more prosperous and developed our nation would be if only it could get rid of this inferiority complex of not knowing English, from the hearts and minds of the mamooli aadmi and also similarly rid of the Superiority complex, of knowing English, form the mind, body and soul of the ‘Khaas (Elite) Aadmi / Aurat.’

Security Guard, now writing in Telugu
Ranjeet writing Petty Cash Account in Hindi

Secularization: Need of the hour for Indian Society

0

“The term secularization implies that what was previously regarded as religious is now ceasing to be such, and it also implies that a process of differentiation which results in the various aspects of society, economic, political, legal and moral, becoming increasingly discrete in relation to each other. The distinction between Church and State, and the Indian concept of secular state, both assume the existence of such differentiation”

~ M N Srinivas (Noted Sociologist)

Secularization is a term that could make many jump out of their seats and scream. It  would attract even more attention if it is attached to the Muslim community in India due to the ‘secular’ nature of media discourse. Hence , I provide the definition of this term from the sociological perspective to clear the doubts of the reader as early as possible in this article.

Social media censure/criticism of  Indian cricketer Mohammed Shami by orthodox Muslims for ‘allowing’ his wife to wear an elegant dress instead of a veil should awaken conscience of liberal Muslims and Hindus alike. This nonsensical imposition of religious ‘morals’ on an individual is not just a random event. It is the symptom of medieval mindset that has been sustained and encouraged actively or passively by the forces that want to isolate Muslims from the mainstream.

This is not different from a ban of the hijab in some of the European countries like France. Invasion of the public or the state in matters related to the individual must be condemned no matter where we stand on other issues. Instead of occupying paternalistic attitude in the imposition or ban of the veil for Muslim women, men (politicians and clergy in particular) must stand aside and let them take the decision themselves.

The tendency of Hindu society to control women  was not very different. However, due to the forces of secularization, it has reduced to a large extent in urban India. In southern states of India, the rural scene is also changing at a rapid pace. Another passage from Mr. Srinivas’s book is relevant at this juncture.

“The sharp rise in the age of marriage of Brahmin girls enabled them to take advantage of opportunities for higher education  and this resulted in a breach of crucial locus of ritual and purity- the kitchen. Traditionally, a young Brahmin girl worked in and around the kitchen with her mother until her marriage was consummate and she joined her affines. All that was required of her was the knowledge of cooking and other domestic chores, the rituals that girls were expected to perform, and respect for and obedience to her parents- in- law and husband and others elders in the household. Education changed the outlook of girls and gave them new ideas and aspirations.”

This book was written in 1960s, a time when modernity and secularization was restricted to upper class urban India. The spirit of secularization has spread to small towns and villages as well in the internet age. There was a time when people in Hindu families were debating whether girls need education. Now, the debate is no longer there. Not educating the girl child is now considered ‘taboo’ in urban India.

Earlier, elders were reluctant to allow women to take up jobs. Now the resistance is negligible and rare in most parts of India. The contribution from women in Hindu families is now common and considered normal. In urban families it is almost a necessity. This is not just restricted to the Brahmin community but almost all Hindu families in the 21st Century. The contribution of women outside the kitchen has been immense.

Instead of giving a stronger voice to the progressive Muslims in India, the media has given more attention to the regressive ones. This has in fact slowed down the pace of secularization and forced progressive Muslims to become mute spectators to the dominant narrative. The infamous fatwa against Sania Mirza wearing a skirt during Tennis matches is a case in point. The following excerpt from her book ‘Ace Against Odds’, Sania writes:

“It is, of course, possible to rake up a controversy by asking a cleric a leading question and then presenting his “opinion” in a manner that would provoke a public reaction. If a scholar were to be asked whether he thought my tennis clothing was un-Islamic, I do not see how a conservative, religious man could have answered the question in the negative in the light of the teachings of the religion.

In a similar vein, if a scholar of religion were asked whether it was permissible for a Muslim man to watch a film on television in which a woman dances to music, I am sure he would have to give the verdict that it was un-Islamic. But, again, most importantly, this would not imply that he had issued a fatwa against the lives of all Muslim men who admired a heroine in a film and that he was going to kill them if they went against his edict!

The person who thought it important to raise a question on what he possibly knew was a contentious issue, could have chosen not to highlight the cleric’s response in his story. Instead, he went to town with it. Had he bothered to understand the true meaning of the word “fatwa” and shown the maturity to write with a little bit of sensitivity, I personally believe I would have been spared the burden of living under the stigma of a misunderstood fatwa for a major part of my career.

Need of the hour for this country is secularization. I hope that politicians and people in media further the cause of secularization rather that play the card of  minority or majority appeasement. Secularization is not just about ‘less religion.’ It is the vehicle that would takes us closer to a rational and progressive society.

Why I won’t watch Dangal

0

First of all I am a great admirer of Amir Khan as an “Actor” and the key word is “Actor”. He has indeed charmed us since times knows when. I remember saving my pocket-money only to buy a sailor hat that he popularized in ‘Dil Hai ke Manta Nahin’ but again i was a kid then. Later we got charmed by ‘Andaz Apna Apna’ and we mesmerized its dialogues when we should have been mesmerizing our science formulas. As time passed I learned to distinguish between a Reel Life Vs Real Life.

As a nation we are very forgiving and sometimes fail to distinguish between real and reel life actors on silver screen. That probably is explained by high number of silver screen artiste in politics.

Personally I admire Amir’s choice of subject as always. I am sure that Mr. Perfectionist would have given his all in this movie and thanks to him for bringing the story of Mahaveer Phogat. Our nation is graveyard of many more stories like these either of success or struggle and I hope many more stories like these find their way to a medium from where their fellow citizens can know about it. Where I am not convinced is, should a purely commercial activity be seen as an act of redemption which would make someone sacrosanct? His views in real life came into light during Narmada agitation. While many slam the present gov or its supporters for calling out others anti-national etc., Mr Khan himself called the present prime minister most “unpatriotic” very loosely. (Ref: Walk the talk with Shekhar Gupta). Now this is a hypocrisy when you want to reserve the right to call someone “unpatriotic” only to yourself.

But again we live in strange times, where truth is stranger than fiction. We live in times where a silver screen actress Pallavi Joshi has to appear and explain the benefits of Goods and Service Tax while an ex revenue officer who is sitting chief minister gives out movie reviews! Lastly Mr. Khan in future just in case your better half feels a bit anxious, ask her to raise her right hand, close her eyes, take a deep breath, place it on her heart and chant “all is well, all is well”.

Munna Bhai H1b calls USCIS customer care for help

0

Munna Bhai stuck in H1b for decades calls USCIS National Customer Service Center at 1-800-375-5283:

USCIS Customer Care: How may I help you? Please state your name and immigration status?

Munna Bhai: I am experiencing crushing labour issues. My name is Munna Bhai H1B for last 10 years.

USCIS Customer Care: Bhai, You need to dial 911 immediately. Do you want me to transfer.

Munna Bhai: You never get it? This is a work force labour issue I am calling about.

USCIS Customer care: My bad, please go ahead.

Munna Bhai: Let me explain you from beginning.. H1b, country quota for annual Green cards, no country quota for H1b visa,90% H1b goes to India (2 billion people).. stuck in indentured servitude.

USCIS Customer care: Oh I see. You called the wrong person. I am just for customer care. Please reach out to Mr. Kevin Cummins.

Munna Bhai: You are the right person. I am your customer and have a genuine concern. Higher levels are in bed with lobby groups. You really seem to be nice and caring. Sometimes, if there is a heavy rain and if I don’t have an umbrella, I stand under the trees. Can you do what you can?

USCIS Customer Care: Oh my gauche. Please go ahead.

Munna Bhai: See, I have made my best fights so far. Did my part for HR3012, HR213, 100k White House petitions, protested in front of White House. Now, I am getting tired and don’t believe anything is going to work because the opponents I face are numerous times wealthier and stronger than I am. Figured out I will try one last option of calling USCIS customer care.

USCIS Customer Care: Oh Dear, sorry about your situation. I will try my best to help you. What is the problem again and how do you think I can help?

Munna Bhai: Let me explain you from beginning. H1b, country quota for annual Green cards, no country quota for H1b visa, 90% H1b goes to India (2 billion people) stuck in. My mom doesn’t want me to come back, she cares for me. My wife wants me to go back to India, not sure if she cares for me, my kid wants me to be here.. I am going thru mid life crisis. oops sorry, I am going through crushing labour issue, work force related USCIS created and ignored labour issue.

USCIS Customer Care: Got that part. Thanks for clarifying again.What can I do to help you.

Munna Bhai: H1bs waiting for GC are ballooning and may soon cross a million at 10% rate increase.There is a crisis. You guys have to match the 7% person country quota on Green cards to the H1bs being issued. My calculation is, if you apply the 7% country quota of Green cards on H1B, India would have got, 975 instead of 45000 H1Bs it got for 2015.

USCIS Customer Care: How did you arrive at that number?How will that solve your problem.

Munna Bhai: Ratios and proportions, school math. This stops the pressure on Green card wait which was increasing every year by 10%. Results in lesser indentured servitude folks and lesser displacement of American workers. And this is perfectly within the rights of USCIS with a valid reason. Now you see, this problem of country quota faced by me, is not just mine to solve. Let the Giants like Tech Industry, USCoC, AILA, USCIS (missed fees and budget cuts?) deal with it. So, I can worry about just my “Life is not fair stuff like everybody else”

USCIS Customer Care: I made a note of all you said and will bring it up in our team discussions with our supervisor. Please note down the case reference number as…

Munna Bhai: Thanks. Well, you may receive 1000s of calls soon from all over the country from folks like me going through labour pain. I will follow up on my case soon or open a new ticket if not resolved.

USCIS Customer Care: Beg your pardon?

Did this abusive journalist do a ‘fake interview’ while with Hindustan Times?

0

Twitter user Swati Chaturvedi is known as an abusive troll, though the mainstream media is trying to project her as an author and a journalist. The abusive language of Swati is known widely to anyone who has spent at least a few days on Twitter. See the tweets in the following image for example:


Not only she is an abusive troll, she writes imaginary news reports without caring for facts and gets published by stupid websites like ScoopWhoop, which is best known for publishing stupid articles that sound like “Six reasons your underwear is not red”.

But since she hates Narendra Modi and abuses BJP supporters on the social media, the mainstream media has been promoting her. Latest being her book, which is a hilarious attempt to malign BJP supporters on Twitter as abusive trolls.

An abusive troll writing about abusive trolling is pathetic in itself, but now her colourful past as a journlaist is coming to the fore on Twitter.

It is being alleged that Swati, then working as a journalist with the Hindustan Times group, had published an imaginary interview of the then Defence Minister George Fernandes sometime in the year 2001.

After the interview was published in the newspaper, Mr. Fernandes is supposed to have called up Shobhana Bhartia, the Chairperson of the media group who hails from a family loyal to the Congress party, and told her that he never talked to anyone named Swati.

Journalist Mohan Sinha, after talking to a Hindustan Times employee, claimed on Twitter that the journalist-turned-abusive-troll had indeed faked the interview:

A Twitter user Shreshtha Sharma claimed that after the complaint by George Fernandes, Hindustan Times conducted an internal inquiry and Swati Chaturvedi was fired from her job as she had faked the interview:

These are serious allegations and warrant inquiry and clarifications. What makes the matter even more complex is Swati claiming recently on Twitter that Fernandes talked to her about the 2002 riots. How can someone talk about 2002 riots in 2001? Was she talking about another interview?

At this time, nothing can be said with certainty whether the interview was faked or whether the above allegations are wrong. All of us now know that journalists creating fake stories is not ruled out. A Firstpost journalist Tarik Anwar was been asked by a court to be prosecuted for faking an interview.

But important to note is that Firstpost never announced publicly that they had fired Tarik Anwar. This fact came to light only after the court asked for prosecution. Tarik Anwar had got a job with the Times Group after Firstpost fired him.

Therefore it is well possible that Swati Chaturvedi was also fired by Hindustan Times but her journalistic career was not impacted. She became a journalist with another media house, and later became an abusive troll on Twitter. And it is also possible that Swati did a legitimate interview.

However, commentators on Twitter pointed to facts like Hindustan Times not archiving her interview. If it was a legitimate interview, why should the media house not archive it? Does it hint that the media house had withdrawn the interview because it was fake? Others asked Swati to produce the audio tape of the interview if it was real, but she has not provided any proof by the time I wrote this report.

Swati can’t be expected to provide any tapes because even if the interview was real, the tapes will be the property of Hindustan Times and not personal property of Swati Chaturvedi.

Thus Hindustan Times must clarify if it has the tape. If it has, why has it not published the interview online in its digital archives? Or whether the interview was indeed faked and a disciplinary action was taken against the journalist. A simple detail about the duration for which Swati was working with them can also help in this case.

Hindustan Times must do it because people should know the truth of kind of journalism that has been practised by journalists all these years. Rumours on either sides must be laid to rest.