Advertisements
Monday, June 1, 2020
Home Opinions Here is how BJP has scored five goals in handling the Kashmir affairs

Here is how BJP has scored five goals in handling the Kashmir affairs

Also Read

Pulind Samant
Pulind Samant is Mumbai born and a post-graduate in ‘Labour Studies’ from the University of Mumbai. He has had a successful career spanning 27 years, as a ‘Human Resource Management’ professional, having worked with a number of reputed Indian and multi-national companies. He is well travelled within India as well as abroad. He is a visiting faculty with his alma mater since the academic year 2015-16. He was an ABVP worker during his graduation and post-graduation days. He writes his blog viz. ‘Let’s Think for India’, on issues in the socio-cultural and socio-political domain, since year 2010. He is a columnist with ‘Organiser Weekly’, New Delhi and his articles are published in the quarterly issues of the ‘Journal for Strategy & Diplomacy’, of ‘Forum for Integrated National Security’ (FINS), Mumbai. He had earlier anchored the editorial team as a documentation consultant, for publishing a study report on contract labour, undertaken by ‘Rambhau Mhalgi Parabodhini’ (RMP). He is a linguist, possessing professional proficiency in the languages of Hindi, Marathi & English, apart from having varying degrees of familiarity with the Indian languages of Gujarati & Konkani as well as foreign languages like French and Japanese. He is also a translator,  translating books from Marathi into English & vice versa, as well as Hindi into English. He is also active on Twitter @pulindsamant.

The interview of Mehbooba Mufti, ex-CM of J&K, by a Hindustan Times correspondent, was published in HT’s 19/09/18 issue. In the said interview, Mehbooba claimed her party to have suffered political setback by combining with the BJP in forming the government in the state. When a party to a contract claims to have suffered a loss in a transaction involving two parties, the other party is logically said to have gained correspondingly, unless it was a loss-loss situation for both. That triggers a thought for verifying whether the said interpretation was true. However, since the current political discourse in the country includes invariably RSS or Sangh Parivar whenever there is a discussion about BJP, weighing the gains for the Sangh Parivar or the right wing as it’s popularly called by the mainstream media, in the whole matter would be a good idea.

BJP had its 25 representatives in the last state assembly, elected in the elections of 2014, which was a historical achievement for the party, compared to its earlier tallies. That was the first visible gain thereby establishing its electoral merit in the state politics, consolidating its vote bank among the Jammu Hindus, which had not found such a clear expression earlier.

When it decided to form the government with PDP, it was not approved of by the general sentiment of its nationwide supporters, quoting PDP’s history of hardline agenda, only marginally different than that of the separatists. The opposition too, had expectedly criticized it to be the marriage of the incongruous. Notwithstanding the same, it went ahead with the decision and got its Deputy CM entrenched there. Having done that and run the state administration jointly with PDP for three and a half years before breaking up, it gained actual experience of running the state apparatus and related insights. That was the second gain.

 

The party continued in position by extracting decisions from its central leadership on unilateral ceasefire during Ramzan, appointment of an interlocutor of a chief secretary rank and even granting amnesty to the stone pelting Kashmiri youth who did not have such history, obviously at PDP’s nudging. That way it displayed the necessary patience towards handling the pressures of governance, contributing substantially towards the state’s effort for peace simultaneously. Here it was the third gain, where nobody could find fault for lack of sincerity or it getting dictated by the Sangh ideology in any manner.

The fourth and biggest gain has been on account of its steadfastness with regard to its core ideology of nation first, demonstrated through various actions like heavy retaliation against terror including the surgical strike of 29/09/16, improving the record of Indian security forces hunting down highest ever number of terrorists including many high profile ones like Burhan Wani. The episode of Major Gogoi getting felicitated at the hands of the Army Chief, for his brave action of tying up a local Kashmiri on Army’s jeep in order to save his soldiers’ lives, would never have happened under any other political dispensation at the centre. As a result, the larger social discourse in the country about terrorism vis-à-vis human rights took a turn in favour of the said actions.

In the above referred interview with HT, Mehbooba Mufti rued throughout about the centre not towing the line of late A.B. Vajpayee with regard to the affairs of J&K. She lauded Vajpayee for being consistent in engaging with the separatists internally as well as reconciling with Pakistan externally, despite the episodes of Kargil war and terror attack on the Parliament, both perpetrated by Pakistan.

 

Although Mehbooba holding up the Vajpayee era examples belonging to almost two decades old period to be the ideal ones in her perspective is understandable, they would not be acceptable ones in the current scenario where much has changed in the intervening period, including the intensity of cross-border terrorism, that of the counter-terrorism operations and also the public opinion.

When quizzed about the distinction between her party’s agenda and that of the separatists in the said interview, Mehbooba could respond with only a single point of difference viz. her party’s (or the mainstream Kashmiri political parties’) belief in the Constitution of India.

Apart from the ‘Vajpayee era’ thing, Mehbooba has also lamented the fact that the central government has not played its role by legislating against any possible challenge to Art.35-A, which is currently under adjudication in the Supreme Court. She has also underlined that Art.35-A was the condition for Kashmir’s ‘alignment’ (not integration) with India in 1947 and is thus unchallengeable. Both PDP and NC have by the way decided to boycott the upcoming Panchayat polls in the state, as a sign of protest against the challenge to Art.35-A.

 

Now looking at both the above claims from a perspective, can one conclude that the mainstream Kashmiri political parties viz. PDP and NC are mouthing their belief in the Constitution of India only because of the presence of Art.35-A and Art.370 there and if the same happen to be removed from there in future as a result of a supreme Court decision, the said belief would end naturally?

As if apprehending the natural fallout of falling out with each other being only a matter of time, BJP decided to exit the government in time, making way for the governor’s rule, scoring its fifth gain in keeping its vote bank intact.

In conclusion, the right wing of India has succeeded in presenting the ‘right’ view to the people of India, as far as the Kashmir affairs are concerned.

- advertisement -

  Support Us  

OpIndia is not rich like the mainstream media. Even a small contribution by you will help us keep running. Consider making a voluntary payment.

Trending now

Pulind Samant
Pulind Samant is Mumbai born and a post-graduate in ‘Labour Studies’ from the University of Mumbai. He has had a successful career spanning 27 years, as a ‘Human Resource Management’ professional, having worked with a number of reputed Indian and multi-national companies. He is well travelled within India as well as abroad. He is a visiting faculty with his alma mater since the academic year 2015-16. He was an ABVP worker during his graduation and post-graduation days. He writes his blog viz. ‘Let’s Think for India’, on issues in the socio-cultural and socio-political domain, since year 2010. He is a columnist with ‘Organiser Weekly’, New Delhi and his articles are published in the quarterly issues of the ‘Journal for Strategy & Diplomacy’, of ‘Forum for Integrated National Security’ (FINS), Mumbai. He had earlier anchored the editorial team as a documentation consultant, for publishing a study report on contract labour, undertaken by ‘Rambhau Mhalgi Parabodhini’ (RMP). He is a linguist, possessing professional proficiency in the languages of Hindi, Marathi & English, apart from having varying degrees of familiarity with the Indian languages of Gujarati & Konkani as well as foreign languages like French and Japanese. He is also a translator,  translating books from Marathi into English & vice versa, as well as Hindi into English. He is also active on Twitter @pulindsamant.

Latest News

George Floyd, another forgotten soul

Everybody worried about and discussing the riots in multiple cities, looting of designer stores, rioting the streets. In all these noises, George Floyd is shouting “I can't breathe, please save me”

Is Trump right to take China on?

Trump has gone ballistic. His bellicose utterances are typically reflective of America First retinue. Would he stay the course? Or he has raised a feverish pitch, so that he can negotiate a sweet trade deal with China, just in time for Nov, 2020 elections.

The one way secularism and why tolerance is it’s necessary evil

So, Indians' tolerance level is directly proportionate to the govt they elect. If they want to be tolerant, they will elect a non BJP govt., if they want to decrease, they will elect Modi govt!

The politics and commerce of anti-Hindu content in mass media

In the past few years in India, we have come across an unusual situation where a number of mass media outlets seem to be “two timers” as in one branch of the organization will support the nationalist narrative and the other will support the leftist narrative.

कोरोना की यात्रा और कोरोना के बाद की यात्रा

सकारात्मक खबर के बावजूद अभी भी कई चुनौतियां बना हुआ है जैसे-अप्रवासी मजदूर के समुचित खाने की व्यवस्था, बन्द पड़े शिक्षण संस्थान में पढ़ाई शुरू करने की चुनौती, कोरॉना के बाद अर्थवयवस्था के पुनरुद्धार की चुनौती, साथ वैक्सीन बनने की चुनौती, भविष्य में प्रसार रोकते हुए जनजीवन सामान्य बनाने की चुनौतीl

The one difference between the Congress of today and that of before 2014

For the sake of the future generations, for the sake of our children, please read more books about how Congress had been ruling the country and be aware of the dangers.

Recently Popular

MNS bares its anti-Hindu fangs

Raj Thackeray’s haphazard attempt to relaunch his party as Hindu outfit has failed, leading to desperation and cheap politics.

साउथ कोरिया में संघ जरूरी क्यों

मैं विग़त 8 महीनो से साउथ कोरिया में रह रहा हूँ। यहाँ भारतीय लोगों की संख्या क़रीब 13 हज़ार हैं। पर एच॰एस॰एस न होने के आभाव में मैंने महसूस किया है, कि भारतीय लोग संगठित नहीं हैं। और संगठित नहीं होने के कारण लोग अपनी संस्कृति से दूर जा रहे हैं।

The one difference between the Congress of today and that of before 2014

For the sake of the future generations, for the sake of our children, please read more books about how Congress had been ruling the country and be aware of the dangers.

In conversation with Nehru: On Savarkar’s mercy petitions

This conversation is only an attempt to present the comparative study of jail terms served by both Savarkar and Jawaharlal Nehru.

भगवान श्रीराम का वनवास जो 500 वर्षों के बाद समाप्त हुआ: श्रीराम मंदिर निर्माण की अनंत कथा

अंततः श्रीराम विजयी हुए, भारतवर्ष विजयी हुआ, हिन्दू विजयी हुए और इस संघर्ष में दिए गए सहस्त्रों बलिदान सार्थक हुए।