Mamata Banerjee's appeasement politics

पश्चिम बंगाल में ममता बनर्जी की जीत के बाद हुई हिंसा राजनीतिक नहीं है, उसके पीछे वहाँ की जनसांख्यिकीय स्थिति मुख्य कारक है।

Is it possible to enact/reform legislation to ensure fair play for these civil servants? If there is a will, there is a way; with the kind of majority the present government has, reform in this area can also be thought of.

BJP’s decision to send Smriti Irani to Bengal as Central In Charge has so many calculations involved, especially her challenging work, dedication, and her instincts to connect with people, especially women are her positive factors

Development+ Secularism gang will be ready to challenge BJP in 2024.

India, condemned to politicians who are either sleeping with the enemy, or tragically incapacitated by its machinations, remains oblivious to the lessons of history and as a consequence, the fate of its citizens.

“बंगाल में, भाजपा का 2016 में, 3 सीटों से बढ़ कर 2021 में, 77 सीटों पर आना, निश्चित ही सामान्य बात नहीं है, जहां 2016 के विधानसभा चुनावों में भाजपा का मत प्रतिशत 10% था, वहीं 2021 में, 38.1% हो गया है, हालांकि 2019 के लोक सभा चुनवों से ये, 2.2 प्रतिशत की घटत है, पर भविष्य में ये कौन सा मोड़ लेता हैं, यह देखना रुचिकर होगा, भारतीय राष्ट्रीय कांग्रेस व वाम दलों के शून्य पे सिमट जाने से, वर्त्तमान में, बंगाल के राजनीति का द्विध्रुवीकरण भी कई राजनैतिक आसंकाओ के उत्पत्ति का कारण है”।।

It won't be Modi or Shah or Nadda or Ghosh or Supriyo or Adhikari who would be at the receiving end of this horrific manslaughter but the common, poor men and women who dared to vote for their party.

The field now seems to lie open for a free for all play of violence of the kind we are witnessing today unless the new government acts decisively and fairly.

Mamata is a died-in-the-wool secularist, as the definition of “secularism” in India is: appeasing minorities.

Despite the victory it appears as if Mamata Didi is unable to digest her loss against Suvendu Adhikari.