Thursday, October 24, 2024
Home Blog Page 830

USCIS treatment of skilled immigrants from India, is nothing less than human trafficking

0

The U.S. Government defines human trafficking as:
“The recruitment, harboring, transportation, provision, or obtaining of a person for labor or services, through the use of force, fraud, or coercion for the purpose of subjection to involuntary servitude, peonage, debt bondage, or slavery.”

USCIS is unable to fix Green card backlog, quoting congressional inaction and availability of resources as a reason.

On the contrary, they are making it more worse by adding into the decade long GC backlogs with disregard for the workers, who are denied the basic right of job mobility. Only because, corporates need more talented people in such queue and also H1b folks contribute millions, into their billion dollar annual budget in fees. Dual intent immigrants (H1b) are still being brought in huge numbers* from a populous country like India which are subject to annual 7% Green card quotas.

*In 2015 alone, 45000 new India based H1bs were approved and brought into the crushing queue of a million Indian H1bs waiting for their Green cards.

This queue increasing at the rate of 10% every year may lead to chaos in the labour market as well as in the economy. It is possible with a million people in such an indentured servitude state, There can be huge change in the dynamics of labour market. These are talented people in indentured servitude, who are demoralized from moving jobs by law.

The Labour law says, if I140 approved folks move to a new job, they need to start a new labour petition and green card petition once again. Also, the technology skill sets of immigrants get outdated in 5 years and may not be able to pass the labour certification anymore. Combined, it acts as a huge barrier and disincentive to move jobs.

USCIS can at least temporarily stop bringing in more H1b from such populous countries like India into the broken system. But they don’t for the aforementioned reasons. Most of the H1b folks from India were not aware of the decade long wait and the unpredictable system and were coerced in the name of liberty, in return for their skills.But were systematically subjected into indentured servitude and were left to fight for themselves.

Being blind and being instrumental to Human trafficking is same as supporting it and USCIS is guilty of it. With neither an intent to fix the GC backlogs nor an intent to stop adding into the crushing GC backlogs, USCIS is effectively contributing to an illegal act of Human Trafficking, ripe with abuse and denial of basic worker rights.

There is a high possibility, if USCIS doesn’t take corrective actions or stop contributing to the system, before fixing it, it may be prone to lawsuits for trafficking skilled immigrants.

Psychology of a Modi-hater

0

First when I met him, he seemed like a normal person. Courteous, compassionate and professional in his demeanor. As long as the interaction was limited to the cubicle-side office chatter, everything looked fine. Then one day, he accompanied me for a coffee. That was the beginning. The first question he asked, ‘Do you follow politics?’, put me on high alert. ‘Yes, I do,’ I replied. ‘Do you like Modi?’ he asked. I watched his expression for two seconds and said, ‘Yes, I do. I appreciate all the good work he does. He’s a great leader’. Then for two minutes, without even space for breathing, he hurled countless abuses at the Prime Minister of India. It wasn’t the first time I had encountered someone who hates Modi but I knew it was going to be a fun ride.

Then came the post-lunch walks in the huge office campus during summer. We discussed organized religion, politics-religion nexus, oil corporations, Illuminati, Zakir Naik, dictatorships, communism and somehow, all discussions ended up with this man abusing Modi. The ability to spin any story into an anti-Modi jibe is a truly remarkable talent. I protested, once or twice and told him that he was way off the mark and even by a long shot, it didn’t make sense for him to drag Modi into everything. He wouldn’t budge. That was the time I decided to carry out an experiment and find out if his aversion is genuine or just a fixation. I decided to turn the tables and instead of letting him ask the questions, I started asking him. The interaction went like this.

Me: Which party should be in power?

He: BJP should be burned to ashes and even those ashes shouldn’t be kept in India

Me: Who do you think should be the PM?

He: Anyone else is fine. Not Modi.

Me: So you have no specific reason?

He: No.

Hypocrisy Score – 1

Me: Which is your favorite country?

He: No answer (note: We both work in USA, have been born and brought up in India)

Me: Do you recognize national borders?

He: Of Course, who am I to not recognize them? (we both laugh)

Me: What do you think of Kashmir?

He: People are dying, there needs to be peace.

Me: True. It’s a diplomatic nightmare. What do you think is the solution?

He: I think we should…..(as expected, he said it. I was enraged.)

Me: How can you say that?

He: I don’t believe in Nationalism.

Me: Why? Is it wrong to love your country?

He: No, but people should not be forced to love their country.

Me: You have a 2-bedroom home. If I come and occupy one of the bedrooms and start throwing things into the other rooms and you’re getting hurt, what will you do?

He: It is my house, how can you occupy my bedroom?

Me: That’s exactly what’s happening in Kashmir.

He: This and that are different.

Hypocrisy Score – 2

Me: How?

He: This is personal, it is political.

Me: You’re Telugu, right. You might have heard of Gurajada Apparao. In his poem, he says, ‘Desamante Mattikaadoi, Desamante Manushuloi’ (mud/land is not what makes a country, it is the people’). So basically, it’s the people. What do you think?

He: Poets say anything they want. We don’t have to agree with everything they say.

Me: Who is your favorite politician?

He: I don’t have a favorite.

Me: Then why do you have a least favorite?

He: Because he’s a bad guy.

Hypocrisy Score – 3

Me: Why is he a bad guy?

He: I don’t like the ideology.

Me: What is a good ideology?

He: Liberalism

Me: What do you like about Liberalism?

He: Everyone’s free to do what they like.

Me: Do you support gay marriage?

He: No.

Me: Why?

He: I find it disgusting.

Me: How come? You’re a liberal, aren’t you?

He: When I was growing up, if someone is a homosexual, he was ostracized, and was frowned upon. So maybe those values stuck with me.

Hypocrisy Score – 4

Me: So you’re conditionally liberal?

He: Everyone is conditionally liberal.

Me: How?

He: Ideology is a matter of convenience.

Me: So you agree?

He: ha ha.

Hypocrisy Score – 5

A few days passed. One morning, as soon as I was in office, I saw the announcement about demonetization. Over the next few days, the buzz, the chaos, the ATM queues, the inconveniences and the notifications from RBI followed. All of these received sharp criticism and scrutiny from several sections of the society. Among them, was my friend. He used choicest words to criticize and abuse the government. He was convinced that demonetization has hardly any effect on black money and ‘Digital India’ is a bogus spin to evade the criticism about the failure in implementation. Then, we went for another walk.

He: Demonetization is utter-flop.

Me: Okay. What do you think happened?

He: Modi helped his friends.

Me: Do you have evidence?

He: No, but I didn’t see any MPs or MLAs in ATM queues.

Me: May be because they sent someone else to stand in the queue instead?

He: May be, but they had their own way of exchanging cash, I am sure.

Me: Do you think Modi is corrupt?

He: No. That I can tell you, he is power hungry, but he is definitely not corrupt. He may have people in his party who are corrupt, but personally, I don’t think he is a corrupt person.

Me: You agree he’s an honest person?

He: Honest, yes. But a good person? I am not sure.

Me: Isn’t that enough?

He: Yes.

Me: Then why do you abuse him?

He: Anyone, but Modi.

Hypocrisy Score – 6

***

He: Do you know that according to a new law, it is mandatory that everyone stands up for national anthem every time you watch a movie?

Me: Yeah, I heard. It’s a stupid rule.

He: How can they force? This is why I hate Modi.

Me: But it was the Supreme Court, it has nothing to do with Modi.

He: I am sure there was influence.

Me: You think PM influences judiciary?

He: May be.

Me: So, you’re not sure.

He: They’re all the same.

Me: But you hate only Modi. Not the court.

He: In this case, I….

Hypocrisy Score – 7

After multiple such interactions, I almost concluded that hatred is an emotion that is driven by impulse. Logic doesn’t play any role and facts don’t matter. There were multiple mentions of the 2002 riots and each time, I explained to him that the courts didn’t find anything wrong with what Narendra Modi did to curb them. He went to the extent of saying that the courts were bought out.

So, to summarize my friend, ‘Narendra Modi is bad, BJP is bad, poetry is bad, courts are bad, army is bad, homosexuality is conditionally good, demonetization is bad, RBI is bad but somehow, Narendra Modi is not corrupt but I still hate him’.

Man who hated blood bank named after Thackeray wants Hindus to love names like Taimur

0

Long back, a friend told me that William Shakespeare once wrote “What’s in a name?” and under this statement mentioned his name. For some reason, the controversies on Saif Ali Khan naming his son Taimur reminded me of this school joke.

In the past 2 days, I’ve read many articles on Taimur, some opposing it vehemently and some vehemently opposing all those who are opposing it. There are two contrary viewpoints:

1. Why should parents be questioned for naming their kids. They are free to name whatever they want, say Twitter, Facebook, Kamal R Khan.

2. Taimur has not only massacred millions of Hindus, but he humiliated the Indic culture in his autobiography. In his autobiography, Timur has stated,

“My object in the invasion of Hindustan is to lead an expedition against the infidels, to convert them to the true faith of Islam and purify the land itself from the filth, infidelity and polytheism.”

People who are outraging against the name have the viewpoint that there should be a cultural sensitivity. Kareena Kapoor says that Saif is a very good historian. So he must be aware of the historical connections of Taimur and India.

Between these arguments, I also came across thin interesting article by Shoiab Daniyal of Scroll. I have often seen Shoiab Daniyal twisting stories, but this particular article was hysterical.

Daniyal boils down the controversy to “Hindus suffering from Mass Inferiority due to thousand years of Slavery”. Slow claps for him, I must say. And as you read more, you will find that Daniyal has linked it to BJP. This time I stood-up and gave him a Roadies Salute.

Internet spares no one. OpIndia guy Bhak Sala posted a tweet which exposed the double-standard of Daniyal.

So just few days back, this guy Daniyal was embarrassed to see a blood bank named after a Thackeray. Embarrassed for seeing a name? Was Daniyal embarrassed because of his mass inferiority? Does this hatred expose his bigotry?

I would end this article with same connotation in which Daniyal started his article

 In most human cultures, blood-bank is an unambiguously a helpful establishment. This moral framework does not, it seems, apply to some sections of media and social media.

Going cashless is the way forward but are we ready for a cashless society?

0

Rome was not built within a day. A cashless society won’t be realized overnight. It takes relentless, incremental and piecemeal progress to make that happen. India is getting to a tipping point where “cashless society” is no more considered to be a science fiction and is more of an inevitable means to thwart corruption, terrorism, money laundering, counterfeiting, tax evading, drug peddling, human trafficking, gambling etc. We need to consign cash to history, slowly and systematically.

Cash dominated economy mothers black economy. In the book “The Abolition of Cash”, author David Warwick animadverted that black market drains $660 billion from US economy, annually. According to a BBC Report, the global average growth of cash usage is 7% per year. This growth is alarming and poses bigger challenge to carry out cashless measures. Cash is still the king and is still superseding card transactions. In the same report, it is further mentioned that in 2012, there were 2.7 billion card payments, but an estimated 3.5 to four billion payments were made with cash.

The demise of cash is almost certain and the world is slowly moving in that direction. The UN has extended its wholehearted support to make cashless society a reality. It further recommends its member nations to go cashless. The UN Capital Development Fund through its ‘Better Than Cash Alliance’ (BTCA) aims to segue into cashless mode universally as a part of financial inclusion by making use of mobile phones and cards. The BTCA is financially supported by the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation(US$3,000,000), USAID (US$3,000,000), VISA (US$3,000,000), Ford Foundation (US$1,500,000), Citigroup (US$1,500,000), UK’s The Department for International Development (US$ 250,000) and Ebay’s Omidyar Network(US$1,500,000). The BTCA uses the technical expertise and suggestions from the leadership of the donor organizations in their programs to replace the use of cash with payment streams. The involvement of such entities might give rise to the suspicion of their vested interests in the outcome.

India has joined UN’s ‘Better Than Cash Alliance’ by announcing its flagship financial inclusion programme Pradhan Mantri Jan-Dhan Yojana (PMJDY). So far 25.98 crore Jan Dhan bank accounts have been opened as of 14.12.2016, out of which 23.22% are zero balance accounts. Out of 25 crore accounts, 15.75 crore bank accounts are purely from rural belt. The amount that has been deposited in these 25 crore accounts exceeds Rs. 74 lakh crores. More than 20 crore Rupay cards have been issued so far, which is a gigantic step taken by Government of India to bring rural people and poor under cashless ambit.

The whole world is enthusiastically embracing cashless economy. A whopping 417 billion cashless transactions were made in 2014. The next step for India would be to formally ban large cash transactions like France, Spain, Italy and other countries in northern Europe are already doing. Given the perilous state of stagnating European economy, most European countries are transitioning themselves to a cashless society. Spain has banned cash transactions of more than 2,500 euros and France and Italy have both banned all cash transactions of more than 1,000 euros.

In Sweden, thousands of ATMs are being removed permanently and most banks of Sweden do not accept cash. 95% of the stores in Sweden have already gone cashless and a mere 2% of the Swedish economy is cash oriented.

Govt. of Denmark intends to eradicate cash by 2030.The Danish Chamber of Commerce is persuading Danish Government to let certain economic sectors the right to refuse cash.

According to Norway’s biggest bank DNB, 60% of Norwegian Cash flows out of Government’s jurisdiction. Therefore, DNB has publicly called for the complete elimination of all cash.

Half of all transactions are done electronically in Australia. According to Westpac Bank Research, Australia will be a fully cashless society by 2022.

According to a CNBC report , 86% of Belgians have access to debit cards and 93% of all their transactions are cashless. 69% of French have access to debit cards and 92% of all their transactions are cashless. 88% of Canadians have access to debit cards and 90% of all their transactions are cashless. 88% of British have access to debit cards and 89% of all their transactions are cashless. 96% of Swedish have access to debit cards and 89% of all their transactions are cashless. 79% of Australians have access to debit cards and 86% of all their transactions are cashless. 98% of Dutch have access to debit cards and 85% of all their transactions are cashless.

This trend is the harbinger of the end of cash as we know it and many other countries will follow their suit.

The truth is also that the governments will want to discourage its citizens from using cash. With each passing day, the financial regulations will become more rigid, restrictions will become tighter, physical money will become more exiguous before cash is entirely obliterated.

The need for the government to push everyone to use digital payment is to make them dependent on the banking system, perpetually. It is also a bamboozled move to bring back all the money into the banking system controlled by loansharking embezzlers. “Cashless Society” can also be a way of the government to gain full control of your finances.

Even in US, out of $US 1.4 trillion greenback is in circulation, each American has about $US 4,200 in cash mostly in hundred-dollar bills. Going cashless is a very bold move, but has a lot of risks. Government should address the risks, before going overboard over the ‘cashless’ agenda. Why should people keep cash in banks, when the interest rates go negative? Why should not they then hold on to their dear cash? In such cases, if money is not allowed to be kept, its pure robbery by banks.

Physical money can’t be hacked to nothing, infected by a virus, inflated by a mouse click etc. These things can happen with representative money. Government does not have a plan that addresses how folks on the periphery are supposed to live. How do you access your bank account, if you live under a bridge without power. God forbid there’s ever a power outage for any reason-all commerce would grind to a halt. This cashless drive can only be successful, as long as electricity and the internet hold up. Citizen’s obsequiousness towards government’s insidious initiatives can sometime backfire.

By bringing everyone onto digital economy, we are creating a monstrous system rife with more fraud and vulnerable to security breaches and disastrous glitches.

  • What is the guarantee that there won’t be any bank bail-ins? In Cyprus, troubled banks removed funds from anyone who carried accounts of over 100,000 euros.
  • Hackers can fiddle with your hard-earned money. 359,420,698 MySpace accounts , 34,842,089 Netease accounts ,164,611,595 LinkedIn accounts ,152,445,165 Adobe accounts,112,005,531 Badoo accounts , 91,436,280 Rambler accounts , 68,648,009 Dropbox accounts , 65,469,298 tumblr accounts have been hacked in the past.
  • Wealth can eroded completely with a few key strokes
  • Disgruntled and Crooked bank employees can copy, sell, fiddle with your data
  • An electromagnetic pulse can wipe out your entire record.
  • A virus can inflate, deflate, and wipe out your money.
  • Digital footprints are hard to erase , even you want to erase them
  • In a developing country like ours, where uninterrupted power supply is a pipe dream, going cashless does not suit our conditions.

Government cannot comb through your every single transaction to validate and provide protection. Reconciliation system is also not well evolved to protect you from transactional errors. Unless and until, these things are addressed, going cashless will always be a dream.

How Bloomberg Quint misquoted Nitin Gadkari to suit their own agenda

0

We all know that the media in India tends to make up stuff and then issue a tiny retraction buried in page 10 right next to the obituary section. They also tend to twist facts and misrepresent numbers to present their narrative. This is one more such case of manipulation of facts and figures to allow them to write a clickbaitey headline.

Bloomberg Quint in an article, headlined “Despite Gadkari’s Tall Claims, Road Construction Is Way Behind Target” put out the following “facts”.

  • “Fact” 1: Mr Gadkari had set a target of 40 kms/day for the NHAI (The NHAI bit is important), to quote the article, “Gadkari maintained the National Highways Authority of India’s FY17 target of awarding new road projects to build 15,000 kilometres even though the road authority’s own data draws a very different picture.”
  • “Fact” 2: The NHAI has awarded contracts only for 2,360 KM’s this year and that this is only 16% of the target,
  • “Fact” 3: I will let the article do the talking here, “The data sourced by BloombergQuint from the NHAI website shows that a mere 1,417 kilometres have been built so far this year, translating to an average of 6 kilometres per day versus the targeted 40 kilometres. That’s just 15 percent.”

Now let us consider the real facts here shall we?

  • Fact 1 – Mr Gadkari had never said that the NHAI had a target of 15,000 km’s in FY 2016-17. He said and I quote from this news report:
    “The politics of development is the priority of this government. We want to raise the speed of our highway construction to 41 kilometres a day”.

As you can see, Mr Gadkari never said that the NHAI (which is but one authority that lays highways) would deliver on this target, but his ministry would.

  • Fact 2 – A basic fact check showed that the government had awarded 3,969 km’s as contracts in the period Apr 1 – Sept 30th.
  • Fact 3 – Some more fact checking showed that the govt had built 2,939 km’s of highways in the period April 1st to Sept 30th, at a daily rate of 16.5 km’s day which is the highest we have managed since independence.

So, what is the cause of this discrepancy?

Well, turns out that the “journalists” who wrote this article are spectacularly disingenuous. For some unknown reason, they sourced their “data” from the NHAI page and included ONLY NHAI built roads in their article. The reality is that the Ministry headed by Mr Gadkari has 3 core divisions under it.

  • The NHAI
  • The National Highways and Infrastructure Development Corporation (NHIDCL)
  • The Ministry of Road Transport and Highways (MORTH).

All three combined fund and build highways in India. The NHIDCL has taken over from the BRDO in building roads in border areas and this corporation alone has 7,957 km’s of highways in the pipeline.

As we don’t have the full data set yet available, back of the envelope calculations based on 2015’s performance can throw some light on what the possible end numbers for 2016 could be.

In 2015, India built 6,029 km’s of roads. Out of which, NHAI built only 2000 km. The rest were by the the other agencies that build national highways in the country. Till Nov this year, NHAI has completed 1400 km’s from April-November(this also includes the monsoon period), and one can expect the NHAI to add another 1,500 km’s in the remaining period. Taking the total to approx. 3,000 km’s. Extrapolating the figure from last year where NHAI constructed approx. 30% of the highways constructed totally, this would mean a total figure of 9,000 km’s. This translates to around 25 kms/day which will fall short of the target of 30 kms/day (revised down from 40 km’s) but would still be the best performance since independence.

Clearly though the need to sell a clickbaitey headline is a higher need than basic journalistic integrity and rudimentary fact checking.

Note – A query to the journalists asking why they only chose the NHAI data and ignored the others went unanswered.

Government mistakes are OK: When will the government system become accountable to common man?

0

This article is not to criticize the government or any organization but an attempt to look at things from an unbiased prism.

The government with the stroke of a pen, made all the currency notes of Rs 500/1000 as null and void. The first thing that comes to mind is that government is pretty powerful. Ahh. How much powerful- almost the whole nation is standing in line to withdraw their own money from banks and ATMs. Why should we stand in lines for hours to get back our own money? Can you ever imagine the government to have to do the same thing for its own money? Can you even think of a government tax official standing patiently in front of your house/office to demand the tax that is due from you. No, by any stretch of imagination, at-least I can’t visualize it in my own dreams. The reality, we almost all know and better know, the day the government feels you owe taxes, you will just get a notice and you better deposit it by a date or else pay steep penalties. So, put it in perspective, you are supposed to take all the steps of a law abiding citizen but the government has given itself enough power in disguise of caring for us to just announce the laws like all your savings are worthless if you don’t stand in ques and get it converted to something meaningful (the new notes of Rs 2000)!

Lets take the greatest example of all and the example of absolute power given to a government body. The police force in our country can pick you up any day you are suspected of anything and keep you up in a locker. Would you argue with the government body “police” that their suspicion on you is incorrect? Our country need to travel a long road, if someday, our police system can be transparent and accountable as in developed countries. How hard is it to have cameras in police stations and the recording kept in records? Well, seems pretty tough as it hasn’t been done in the past 60 years or so.

Ok, one more awesome example before it gets too long. This is for all my friends who have faced Judiciary. When would people start approaching the courts with their problem as if the legal system would come to some conclusion in decent time frame like months instead of years. I have seen so many issues between people but people are so afraid to go to court, they will better settle it right there right now instead of dragging it for years and by the time the court comes to decision, even the concerned parties have lost interest in their own cases!

I am not saying we live in a hopeless country, all I am saying is the system has glaring problems and if someone wants to solve the problems, the country got great young plethora of educated people. The system just need to put accountability in the system and the country can do miracles.

PS: Somebody is trying to change the system, we should support him. But also he should see the lengths people are trying to go to support him and not take the support for granted!

Demonetization: A well-coordinated attempt or a knee-jerk disaster?

0

The announcement & the aftermath

If ever there has been a PM’s address to the nation as important as the one on the midnight of 15th August 1947, it is that of PM Modi on 8th November 2016 announcing the discontinuation of Rs. 500 and Rs. 1,000 currency notes. Whilst innumerable reactions started surfacing everywhere even before the PM completed his address, one of the most obvious one was this is a political stunt for the upcoming state elections. In the following days, one article went to the extent of blaming PM Modi for ‘stealing RBI’s thunder’ by announcing what was typically a monetary policy decision taken by the central bank of the country. The author’s alleged logic there was the PM probably wanted renewed publicity as the surgical strikes were fading quickly in public’s memory and the flak government had drawn in wake of their flip flop on the decision to roll back the one day ban of NDTV for their irresponsible coverage of the Pathankot terror attack. Nothing can be farther from truth than this theory in my opinion.

Although the BJP obviously stands to gain in the upcoming elections courtesy the government’s aggressive stance against the menace of the black money, as is evident from the municipal election results from some of the Western parts of the country, one cannot link PM’s decision to address the nation himself to make this announcement merely with the political gains he intended to achieve.

For, if the PM really wanted to reap political benefits from important events such as this one, he would have addressed the nation himself even to announce the surgical strikes conducted in PoK in light of the Uri terror attack. Nothing would have given him more popularity (not that he really needs it) than breaking the news of avenging the martyrdom of the soldiers killed in Uri and countless civilians in earlier similar attacks by the neighboring terrorist state. But that announcement was rightly done by the Director General of the Military Operations as they obviously deserved all the accolades for the fitting response they dished out to the country’s enemy. This decision stood vindicated even more in the light of the baseless questions raised around the surgical strikes by the self-proclaimed greatest ‘Anti-Corruption’ crusader of our times. One can only imagine how many more questions our myopic opposition political parties would have raised had the PM broken this news to the country instead of the military. This proves the point that we have a responsible and a mature leader in PM Modi at the helm of our country.

Based on this experience, one might agree with the logic of the author mentioned above that the RBI governor should have announced the currency ban as it was a monetary policy decision. While this is untrue even theoretically, one cannot even begin to imagine what would have transpired if the PM himself did not make this important announcement.

For starters, the political opposition and backlash demanding a rollback would have been immediate and much more severe from all the opposition parties. They would have readily gunned for the RBI governor stating the move is half baked and not well planned. Secondly, to discredit the government and this move, two distinct theories/questions would have been floated in the media– was the PM even involved in the decision making process on such an important matter or was he busy with his international ‘tours’? Or was this actually the PM’s idea but since he was not confident of its practical implementation, he used the RBI governor as a front to backstop the impact and questions on his governance style in case the move failed to see the light of the day. Last but certainly not the least by any means, anyone making this announcement other than the PM himself, would have found almost negligible support from the man on the street. So, in a nut shell, the entire move to target the multi-faceted shadow economy would have been a disaster, and worst of all it would have ended up giving the black money hoarders an opportunity to flush out their cash reserves and convert them into other type of assets to prepare for any future attempts by the government to target the black money.

Having expected all of this and more, the PM rightly took it on himself to make this important address. This way he ensured absolutely no communication gap in announcing the need for such a bold move and how exactly it would impact the nation. This also delivered a huge blow right from the word go on all the mischief mongers– opposition political parties, black money hoarders with deep pockets and contacts in the right places and most of all the biased sections of the media who got no chance to twist the facts or the Government’s intentions with this historic step. But the biggest positive impact the PM had was on the common man–the one who was to, and is still somewhat suffering from the impact of this unprecedented move to set the country’s economy right. While the immediate broad-based support to the PM’s move coming from across the nation and society at large, which has been struggling with unrelenting food inflation for almost a decade and ever spiraling corruption in various sections of the administration was not really a surprise to anyone, it was the after effects which the PMs address soothed really well. Faced with a daunting task of replacing the old denomination currency, the common man and the bankers are working relentlessly post a day’s break after the PM’s address. Such has been the enthusiasm of most of the people involved that queuing up outside the bank was even compared to a soldier’s duty who works for protecting us for the betterment of the nation. While the risk a soldier takes just by standing up for his fellow countrymen cannot be appreciated enough, such a dedication and calmness from the common man to support the government’s move surely would not have been achieved if anyone other than the PM addressed the nation on this unexpected move. So, it has bought some much needed time for the banking infrastructure in the country to replace the old currency in a structured manner and also for the tax authorities to keep an eye on huge depositors of old currency notes.

That the wind was knocked out of the opposition parties is very evident from their ever changing stance on the issue even seven weeks post the announcement. Except a couple of them who strongly oppose and couple of them who strongly support this move, the rest are still struggling to come up with an appropriate response.

Ultimate Destination or just the start of the domino effect?

One myth doing the rounds since the PM’s announcement on demonetization is this is probably the last of the salvo government has fired on the black money hoarders. Despite the fact, PM himself announced this is just the beginning at an election rally few days after November 8th, people and politicians at large have felt (or hoped in some cases) this is the final blow government had planned. But as always, irrespective of people’s perceptions, the government has proven beyond doubt that demonetization was indeed just pulling off a linchpin and they are closely monitoring the reactions from various sections of the society like businesses, politicians, hawala operators, etc. in its aftermath.

It is an alarming indicator for the government that even seven weeks after the initiation of demonetization, common people are queuing up outside the banks and ATMs to withdraw their own hard-earned money (although in increasingly smaller numbers). Moreover, this is happening despite the withdrawal limits and after repeated assurances from RBI and government that sufficient currency has been printed and distributed to banks across the length and breadth of the country. Rightly so, the government is trying to identify the root cause of this problem and all its economic wings are working with good co-ordination to identify and nail the culprits like some of the corrupt bank employees, touts and others who are helping the black money hoarders convert their illegitimate wealth from old currency into new. In the sixth week alone, since November 8th, close to Rs. 240 crores were seized in new currency from such raids across the country. Now, compared to the staggering valuation of some of the multi billion rupees worth of scams conducted during UPA II, this number might seem like small change, but one must realize that with a weekly withdrawal limit of Rs. 24,000 per account, this money would have been sufficient to cater to currency demand of as many as 100,000 account holders. And since not everyone utilizes the entire limit of Rs. 24,000 every week, realistically speaking, this sum of Rs. 240 crores would have actually catered to a lot more people across banks and ATMs throughout the country.

So, to those who are blaming the government and the RBI for mismanagement or lack of preparedness for such a massive crackdown on black money, they would be better served if they realize the amount of efforts the government and other state agencies are actually putting in to identify the systemic root cause of corruption and generation of black money in the economy. For, the number of successful raids we are seeing almost daily these days just proves the fact that the authorities are not shooting in the dark but are working with almost surgical (pun intended) accuracy based on stringent monitoring of people with unusual banking transactions and gold purchases post November 8th. A strategy which would surely have been in place even before the formal announcement of demonetization.

What this also proves is that even if demonetization by itself might not set everything right in our economy, it sure is exposing the termites which are proving to be the biggest hindrance in our country realizing its true potential in the global landscape. And the worst or the best part is the fact these termites are not merely limited to political parties but widely prevalent all around us.

 50% tax rate for offenders: Did the entire country queue up outside banks and ATMs for a mere 5% more tax recovery than the earlier IDS?

This is one question which started bothering me and various other honest tax payers from the moment the 50% tax rate was announced for offenders who come forward even now and declare their unaccounted wealth. This is merely 5% more than the tax rate under the Income Declaration Scheme (IDS) concluded on September 30, 2016.

Did the entire country suffer through demonetization for a mere 5% additional tax recovery? Absolutely not.

For starters, this is not merely 5% more tax recovery but 50% more tax recovery, because whoever declares their unaccounted wealth now, is doing so because of the fear instilled in them with demonetization. Something which could serve the country well in the long run with lesser people wanting to run the risk of hoarding cash reserves accumulated through illegitimate means. Secondly, 50% is not the only amount of tax the offenders have to pay, they also have to let go of another 25% for an interest free period of four years in Pradhan Mantri Garib Kalyan Yojana (PMGKY), during which no interest shall be paid to them for that amount. If a FD interest rate of even 7% is compounded for four years on this 25% of the amount, the total comes to almost 8% of the total undeclared income. Since the offender shall not get this 8% interest, their effective tax rate is 58% (50% Tax + 8% Foregone interest). Although an additional 13% might still not justify the efforts a common man on the street has put in trying to withdraw their own money, it sure serves way better than a mere 5%, because it would also help finance the rural poor who rightly need this money. Lastly, one must not forget that once this 100% of undeclared amount has been accounted for, it would help the country’s economy to correctly reflect its size, growth rate, etc. Furthermore, now this entire amount would be legitimately in circulation through the economy.

Over and above all this, what this move has also done is brought about a change in the way society looks at their cash holdings and transactions. While there might have been a minor jump in the demand and hoarding of new currency notes because of the uncertainty around its availability, this additional demand is more than offset by the significant rise in cashless payments and digital transactions in general. This rise in cashless transactions is not merely because of shortage of currency but also because of a major change of habit in the way we look at day to day economic transactions. Only now are we realizing that close to 75% of our daily transactions can easily be taken care off through digital means and do not necessarily warrant an exchange of currency (at least in metro cities and surrounding suburban areas). This simple change of viewpoint would go a long way in bringing our economy back on track and improving transparency across the board.

Way Forward

The case for the need and benefits of demonetization are still as strong as they were before and on 8th November when this was announced. However, it is the short term pains it has generated along with the intentional misguidance by the opposition parties which is trying to take away the attention from the unchecked menace of our shadow economy. While we mention the short term pains this move has caused, it is also important to look at some of the immediate positives which have come out of this move.

  1. Kashmir has returned to normalcy almost across the state in less than seven days after demonetization was announced. This has happened after close to four months of unrest, curfews, stone pelting, torching of schools, etc. which resulted in the death of close to 100 people, including the Army personnel trying to control the protestors.
  2. A record 500+ Naxalites have already surrendered to the law enforcement agencies as they were left with no means to survive because they could not use their old 500 and 1000 rupee notes.
  3. The infiltration attempts by the Pakistani terrorists are significantly down as they are finding it difficult to get the new high denomination Indian currency. Although this could restart in the future, at least for now there is much needed respite and more importantly this move shows how big a factor monetary economics plays in a topic as complicated as terrorism.

While this is not a complete list of positives, it certainly highlights the most important ones.

So, while queuing up outside banks and ATMs is surely taxing, let us brace ourselves and continue doing what we have since 8th November to counter this social and economic evil, along with continuing to believe in our democratically chosen PM. For, unlike his predecessor, he certainly knows what he is doing.

Flawed approach of Congress to Army chief’s appointment

0

In a world offering unprecedented anonymity to people on social media, and a tempting opportunity of unimaginable dishonesty to people on mainstream media, it is appropriate to make a disclaimer pronouncing my lack of credentials when I write about subjects in which my interest is limited to being a logical and nation-loving Indian. I was not an economist when I wrote about demonetization and I am not a military or defense expert, when I am writing this post about the needless controversy being raked about the appointment of the new Chief of Army Staff (COAS). I wrote earlier on Demonetization as an ordinary citizen and possibly, as a poet and a writer, with no ax to grind. My intent of writing on the appointment of the next Army chief is similar. I do not know the new Army Chief, Lt. General Bipin Rawat, nor do I know the two officers he superseded, both by all accounts of exemplary merit. We live in odd times. The social media is a lawless arena. It offers great opportunity to naive and lesser knowledgeable souls like me, it also offers those with lies in their eyes and conspiracy in their pen to use this lawless playground into a location for creating fake Frankensteins and set about unsuspecting masses to chase and fight them. So editors would happily write their official designation in their Twitter profiles and then put a remark with asterisk, something akin to declaration running at the end of mutual fund investment advertisement, that tweets are personal. The opposition party out of power, having bitten dust in the last election, though have lost the numerical supremacy in the electoral battle on account of their dynastic politics and unprecedented corruption, insists on continuance of their role in national governance and polity.

We are living in a world of easy information availability and if one were to put his mind to it, truth will easily be out. But then, unfortunately this is also an age of information deluge. Before we could dig into one falsehood and extract the lies, comes another falsehood, more evil, more complex than the previous one. A defeat is a time for reflection and introspection. The problem with Congress is that they cannot do that. Introspection in the context of the grand old party is impossible, because it would mean a change in leadership, thoroughly proven to be incompetent, if not thoroughly corrupt. The dynastic politics prevents any genuine possibility of introspection and improvement. The dynastic heads at the top, Humpty-dumpty, mother-son duo, stay untouched, and beyond questions. The courtiers who derived power from the continuity of the dynastic rule are the most ruffled, and they have no qualms in stooping to whatever level, in order to, in some way, restore the earlier status. They have no respect for any institution, having trampled over all that the narratives built for themselves, post independence. They build narratives, those narratives are echoed with amplification and beyond a point, no one cares what the truth was. It happened in case of Beef Ban, in case of Demonetization, and now they are intending to create a communal angle around the appointment of the Army chief. The apolitical, dignified and selfless nature of Indian defense forces is a matter of pride for an Indian citizen, especially when compared to the neighboring nations. While the respect for the Forces remain untarnished for the common citizen, Congress never cared about the forces. Possibly post-71 war, Indira Gandhi realized that while people respected the political leadership for the great victory, there was some glory to be shared with the armed forces. She did not like it much and possibly the pension for soldiers was altered, pay commission scrapped, within three years of the 71 victory. It was almost as if she was waiting for Sam Maneckshaw, the soldier’s soldier to retire. Even Field Marshal, the Patron-Commander of the Indian forces was deprived of his dues, settled only when he was towards the last of his life.

It is preposterous for such a party to now show concern about the appointment, and cry hoarse about the appointment of Lt. Gen. Rawat superseding two other officers. Two Congressis, Shahzad Poonawala and his brother, came forward, even alleging the communal angle. Now, I will not write a detailed note of how there is a merit in this appointment superseding the two officers in question. It is not for me to answer. This question is aptly settled by Retd. Gen Syed Ata Hasnain in his post on Swarajya Mag. He explains how possibly the experience in North-West and North-East, both with sensitive borders and acute insurgency, of Lt. General Rawat went in his favor vis-a-vis Lt. General Praveen Bakshi, a cavalry officer and Lt. General PM Hariz. In the context of attacks on Army in Kashmir and recently in North East, it does makes perfect sense. The congress on the other hand, not only called this appointment cherry-picking by government of the day, the foot-soldiers of the corrupt queen, ousted from power, even called it RSS design to avoid making a Muslim, that is Lt. Gen. Hariz, head of Indian Army. That their allegation were false and unfounded made no difference to them. They spoke their nonsense into the abyss of absurdity called Twitter, with their blue-ticked soldiers amplifying it dutifully. Only few days back, we had all the media propagandists tweeting how it was unsafe to do financial transactions on-line, on account of hacking of the Twitter account of the prince. What was shamelessly exposing was the fact that they all tweeted tweets which were identical, verbatim. It was also interesting that their Twitter accounts were allegedly hacked, but none of them advocated leaving twitter until the security is improved, they attacked the security of a totally unrelated applications. If modern IT is so insecure, what do we do, send pigeons and fly kites? They would not answer that. The game is clear, this is what Rahul Gandhi meant when Congress lost the Delhi election that they ought to become more like AAP. So it is shoot and scoot game is at play. Poonawala claimed that Lt. General Hariz was superseded since government wanted to avoid a Muslim commander. The dubious duo conveniently ignored that even if seniority was followed, Lt. General Bakshi would have become the chief. If they bring about the argument that Lt. Gen Hariz could have succeeded General Bakshi, that is also not based on facts since Lt. General Hariz is set to retire before General Bakshi. One would breathe a sigh of relief that it is just fortunate that their conspiracy theory is weak on facts. But then it might not have been, what hell would have broke lose in that case.

The argument is so absurd, especially coming from Congress. APJ Abdul Kalam, the late president, also the Supreme Commander of Indian Forces, in his second term, was supported by BJP, but was ditched by Congress because in his first term, he refused to toe the Sonia Gandhi line. No one uttered a word when a Muslim Commander in Chief was replaced by a woman congress leader from Maharashtra with dubious record. Congress had set aside the seniority principle in appointments in their regime as well recently, even if we do not go as far back as the appointment of General AS Vaidya. Admiral RK Dhowan superseded Vice Admiral Shekhar Sinha to become Navy Chief in 2014. Outside Army, in 2012, Congress appointed Syed Asif Ibrahim as IB Chief superseding, four officers. BJP was the main opposition, had 159 seats. BJP did not utter a word, not on his religion at least. But Congress, with 44 seats in the parliament and grand illusions of its stature even as opposition would not show even a modicum of decency, would not leave any institution un-attacked. Little do they appreciate how deeply they annoy any nationalist Indian, as their politics continue to revolve around the Mother-son duo, while senior leader in their own party languish in subordinate roles. I don’t care what they do with their ailing institution, I have quarrel with them trying to tarnish a fine institution in their zeal to attack the Narendra Modi government. There will be finer writers and better experts who will blow holes in the fake outrage of the Congress. I am writing to record my protest. I am writing because lie unchallenged will become truth. I am writing to tell the despotic dynasty, with everyday tantrum, Initially the nation was excited, now, it is bored, soon it will be annoyed and disgusted. I had written earlier as well, I urge you once again, let the soldier be.

Happy Birthday, Jane Austen

0

“What chance would the craftiest biographer stand against the subject who saw him coming and decided to amuse himself.”- Wrote Julian Barnes about Gustave Flaubert, in Flaubert’s Parrot, a semi-biographical fiction on Flaubert. Essentially his point is let the writer be, as a person, that is. Jane Austen makes for an even difficult person to be traced. Mr. Austen Leigh (Jane Austen’s nephew) wrote about her, “I doubt whether it would be possible to mention any other author of note whose personal obscurity of was so complete.” It sure does help when we consider the work of a writer which defined the way we looked at things for generations to come. That is the reason having spent one chapter arguing against it, Barnes ended up writing Flaubert’s Parrot and I end up writing here about Jane Austen. But this is not a biography, not even a biographical note (which can be found on Wiki), rather an homage and an ode.

Jane Austen was born this day, on 16th of December, 1775. I am always in awe of women writers. The amount of attention they pay to the words they pen is evident in the exquisite arrangement of the language, and how the works of most women writer caresses the soul. Virginia Woolf might beat me up with a stick, if only she were alive today, for suggesting women’s writing to be different from that of the writing of male writers. But then it is true. Both Heart of Darkness and Orlando for that matter are great work of literature, but there is a wry baritone which runs in your mind when you read Joseph Conrad, which is distinctly different from the soft and elegant tenor of Virginia Woolf or Jane Austen. I am particularly fond of the writings of women author from Eighteenth and early Nineteenth century. There is certain calm, a noticeable peace and patience about those writings. Probably it reflects the time in which they were written. When you read these books, they don’t leave scars on your soul, they leave your soul smiling and satiated.

She died at the age of 41 on 18th of July, 1817. She published six novels in this short time – Sense and Sensibility, Pride and Prejudice, Mansfield Park, Emma, Northanger Abbey and Emma; her first, Sense and Sensibility written at the age of Twenty-One. She wrote about the dogmas of her times, and without any bitterness of feelings or shrillness of sound she describes her world as a neutral narrator, with an almost uninterested vantage point. But that is nothing but a smart and successful tool to fool us. We know she is not merely a talkative bystander when she wrote what was to become the most famous first lines of a novel for all times “It is a truth universally acknowledged, that a single man in possession of a good fortune must be in want of a wife” in Pride and Prejudice. As we read through the anxiety of a mother of five girls, Mrs. Bennett, struggling to get her daughters married in a prosperous and respectable family, we know that Jane is breathing in not only Mrs Bennett or another woman in the story. She is in all the women of the story, while Elizabeth Bennett is what she strives to be. Elizabeth, the scholarly girl, is not a cynic; she has a deeply romantic world view. She is not the one wanting to let go of her intellectual moorings to leap into the world of love. She represents the girl who gets it all by refusing to let go of her true self. She thus becomes a woman of aspiration for all girls, and remains so now after more than two centuries. Her stories are happy and hopeful with the bright sunlight pulsating across the pages, even in the rains and storms.
Jane Austen, George Elliot, Charlotte Bronte and Virginia Woolf are the writers, whose work stand as light houses, on the voyage of women emancipation across the centuries and their glory lies in the never-fading, never-diminishing charm that their work holds, in the timelessness they encompass. There work irrespective of the styles they represent, have one common theme: of women discovering the inner beauty of their soul, of women choosing intellect above the skin. All these writers, build amazing characters, way ahead of their times. All these writers did not write critiques of their times, they were much smarter. They instead created lovely characters who were ahead of their times and thus their characters became their argument against the inconsistencies of their times. That is why they succeeded so profoundly. Their heroines are incongruous to their times, but by God, they are so adorable that one want to be them. For a young girl, no sermons would set her on a path of intellectual discovery swifter than a reading of the character of Elizabeth Bennett; and Jane does it without killing the softer romance. Miss Elizabeth Bennett’s emancipation is not in quarrel with her desire for love, it rather created the foundation for a self-respecting and real romance. They did not give their readers a shrill slogan; they gave them a dream to pursue. She celebrates womanhood, she is proud of being a woman. For Jane, her story is the message, her characters are the slogans. Her slogans never shout, they whisper softly, they speak to the soul – about identity, about social divide, about intellectual discovery, about refinement of the soul. It is this tenderness of representation which makes Virginia Woolf compare her with none other than Shakespeare when she writes in A Room of Her Own, “Here was a woman about the year 1800 writing without hate, without bitterness, without fear, without protest, without preaching. That is how Shakespeare wrote.” And she didn’t have a room of her own, she wrote in her sitting room, hiding her papers whenever someone walked in. She would never come in the way of the story she told, she would only breathe into her words at a very subliminal level.

It is not easy to write about Jane Austen. It is not even brave; it is actually foolhardy to try to explain that greatness. Virginia Woolf wrote in 1924 “Anybody who has had the temerity to write about Jane Austen is aware of two facts: First, that of all great writers she is the most difficult to catch in the act of greatness; second, that there are 25 elderly gentlemen living in the neighborhood of London who resent any slight upon her genius as if it were an insult offered to the chastity of their aunts.” I still attempt to write about her, not as a literary historian or an author of such worth to attempt to evaluate her, rather as a fan and an admirer of the expansiveness of a woman’s mind when she decides to soar high. I also write as a father to a little girl, in whom I see Elizabeth Bennet of Jane Austen, Jane Eyre of Charlotte Bronte, Dorothea Casaubon of MiddleMarch and well, I would confess, Dagny Taggart of Ayn Rand. I hope I will be forgiven for this audacity. Happy Birthday, Jane. May your stories be read for all the centuries to come, may our girls be intellectually as brave as Elizabeth Bennet who would look into eyes of every challenge and proclaim in a soft yet unwavering voice , “My courage always rises with every attempt to intimidate me.” Forget the grays, girls, true emancipation will come about in the bright sunlight of Ms. Austen’s world. We need more, not less of it.

Beware: MSM spreading lies about rift between Ramdev and PM Modi

0

The Quint has recently released one story claiming that all is not well between Baba Ramdev and the BJP. As expected, the site has conveniently twisted Baba’s statement to create a catchy headline.

The concerned article’s headline suggests that there is a rift between the Yoga Guru and the Prime Minister. It also indicates that Ramdev tagged note-ban as a scam. This is nothing but a distortion of facts because Baba Ramdev spoke about implementation and was actually talking about a scam in the banking sector.

Most importantly, the Yoga Guru has highlighted the fake note scam from Congress era and RBI’s involvement in the interaction. However, the Quint conveniently ignored that part and kept it out of the story. Perhaps, they wanted to give an anti-Modi angle to the story and keep someone happy by not discussing fake notes distributed by the RBI during Congress regime. Let’s take a look at Yoga Guru’s complete statement.

What did Baba Ramdev say?

Even today, most of the people waiting in queue outside banks or ATMs will praise Prime Minister Modi for his step. Some of them would probably criticize plan’s implementation. People would also ask the government to take strict action against corrupt nationalized bank employees who went an extra mile to help the corrupt. This is exactly what Baba Ramdev has said!

“PM Modi must have never imagined that so many bank officials from various banks are corrupt. I think bank employees must have made millions of rupees, and the government would find that this banking sector scam is worth three to five lakh crores”, said Ramdev, while interacting with journalists during an event organized by Dainik Bhaskar.

He pointed out that cash supply was adequate, but banks gave those new notes to corrupt black money holders. Thus, implementation could have definitely been better.

Baba Ramdev highlighted the point that RBI was probably involved in fake notes scam during Congress regime according to news reports. Two notes with same serial numbers were found during UPA rule. If such notes are found yet again, it will create a huge blot on the country’s economy.

Even now, some officials from the RBI are under scanner, and this is very unfortunate. This puts a question mark on the overall government machinery. Prime Minister showed too much faith in bankers.

On being asked about his suggestions given to PM Modi, Baba Ramdev shared the information that he had advised the government to remove higher denomination notes, promote a cashless system and impose transaction based tax. The third suggestion was bringing transparency in the banking system.

He made it clear that he looks at all parties from the same lens and he has openly supported PM Modi during Lok Sabha polls. So, the point is clear, he has criticized implementation and has not said anything against the party or PM Modi. It’s better to ignore rumor mongers. They are everywhere, not just leftist friends, but even some RW websites write crap full of grammatical errors with catchy headlines to make revenue from Google.