Home Blog Page 696

The (True) Idea of India

0

“India is great, but little late.”
I read this quote on the wall of a backpackers’ hub at Pushkar many years ago. The foreign friend was right, of course. But there are reasons and, more importantly, there is hope.

• India is a continent, not a country. Many of our states are larger than some countries. Many of our cities have more population than some countries (no, we are not proud of this baggage). Yes, we are slow because we are still recovering from centuries of invasions and foreign rule. But we are a democracy too. Let’s all remember that – things can’t be forced.

• We speak multiple languages. There are 22 official languages; while some countries speak the same language and claim to be different people. We have arguments and frequently misunderstand each other!

• We are a junction of four ethnic groups – Caucasians from the North West, Mongoloids from the North East, Negroids from the South and Australoids from the South East. We are a melange of races – we look different from each other, we tease each other! We have 50% reservation for our poorer “castes”, we have had dalits in the top-most places including presidents (in comparison, the US got its first black prez only recently).

• We are a melting pot of religions. Hinduism, Buddhism, Jainism, Sikhism were born here. Islam and Christianity have been assimilating here for centuries. We are masters of multi-culturism. Heck, we even have languages born out of this assimilation. They are called Hindi and Urdu.

• We have been a playground for international intrigue for centuries since the Great Game. The CIA , KGB, Chinese intelligence, ISI and Saudi money have created communists, socialists, fascists of all sorts in a country which still believes in democracy. Since independence, we have been victims of five wars, religious terrorism, communist terrorism and socialist corruption. Yes, we are messy. It will take a while to recover, or win.

• We have terrain of every type – the world’s highest Himalayan snowline, evergreen forests, deserts, coasts, plateaus, islands, you name it. We dress different, we walk different. India cannot be judged through one touristy circuit of Eat, Pray, Love fame.

• That the hordes of backpackers, hippies, Beatles, MIT-techies, Buddhists, ISKCON followers et all come here to find themselves is no surprise. We are the oldest, continuing cultural REGION with millions of gods (even one who smokes pot and swings the gender barrier), numerous goddesses , science and literature. People are here for its ancient culture – Ayurveda, Yoga, literary texts like Vedas, Upanishads, Tantras, Arthashthra, Bhagwad Gita, Manusmriti, the Epics, Persian architecture, Bhakti (including Buddhist and Sufi), tales of valour (the Rajput, Mahratta and Sikh resistances), colonial period and our multi-hued Independence movement.

• We have matriachial societies in many regions. We have had women in positions of power – including presidents and PMs. In comparison, many developed countries are still waiting for a woman prez!

• Our crime rates are comparable with the world’s – there are criminals everywhere. Women are as safe (or unsafe) as elsewhere, as the UN data (at The Spectator’s Index in Twitter) shows – most developed countries have higher rates of crime against women (including US, UK, France, Germany, Australia). Of course, we are not proud of this either, even though our chauvinist Bollywood is one main cause. Visiting friends, just follow the exact rules normal citizens follow for New York, or Paris, or Berlin, or London, or Sydney. Don’t take lift from strangers. Don’t go into or through known city crime zones without escort at night. Staring is an issue (rural societies do not know that it is rude to stare) due to the ongoing rapid urbanisation. Ignore.

• We are recovering from a longish socialist rule. There is a progressive democratic revolution in progress. Hence the counter – narratives on religion, caste, intolerance, safety, lynching etc mostly sponsored by the Leftists regimes (including US democrats!). Isolated cases of crime over this vast country are selectively (based on religion / caste) threaded together in leftist media reportage for a short period to build up hype about a supposed intolerant “agenda”, and then as suddenly vanishes.

• The aim is to develop a persecution complex amonst the minorities so that they vote for UPA and its coterie (as Congress used to say in the late 70s – “Jab tak Ali (i.e. scared minorities who can be appeased) aur Coolie (i.e. illetrate poor who live on subsidies) hamare saath hai, we can never lose”. We all know how 68 writers have been hired by Analytica, we know how 1000 crores of hawala money was received at NDTV (both cases in court), we know how some NGOs have sold their soul for power, fame and money. Our sense of political correctness has been compromised by a sustained misinformation and disinformation campaign.

Yes, we are late, but we will be great, AGAIN.

Mahagathbandhan feasibility and Congress’ fate

0

Mahagathbandhan (MGB)- that is the word in every political pundit’s mouth. Some of the “neutral” media persons have started writing about how MGB should be formed to take on BJP or rather Modi. That it has to be 1 on 1 fight in each of the 543 seats with the strongest party getting to fight BJP. That they are salivating at the prospect of Modi v/s All tears of their mask of being neutral – but that is for some other time. Everyone from the media to the political parties themselves are in this only to stop 1 man – they wouldn’t mind BJP forming the govt with Modi not being the PM and that is their 2nd target, if their ambition of forming the govt doesn’t fructify.

Coming to MGB most of the regional parties want to come together because for some like BSP, NCP, RJD, NC it has become a battle for their survival. They fear they could be wiped off again which would then make them irrelevant. Some like TMC, TRS have a very stronghold in their region and would again win handsomely but want MGB so that they can wield their influence and have a shot at getting to the PM chair or get major ministries. While all these regional parties want to come together the major point of contention is going to be accommodating Congress. TRS may not even join such a front while TMC would want Congress to play second fiddle which may hurt the ego of the dynasty. Other parties have been/are at the beck and call of Sonia and so wouldn’t mind Cong playing the dominant role/Rahul being their PM candidate.

Given all this, let us see if MGB is even feasible and how the parties would go about stitching it. As mentioned above TRS may not join at all and be part of this – they may consider supporting if the post-poll scenario throws a hung parliament if they could see something substantial for them. Mamata would want to pitch herself for the highest chair but may climb down and be a part of this as she has been more vocal against Modi and talking about sacrifices and even building bridges with her arch-rival the Communists. The other parties would obviously want MGB and so this looks more feasible. However, that is NOT the point as @imac_too handle would say.

SP, BSP, NCP and RJD would not only want to be in MGB but would also want Cong in it. But, when it comes to seat sharing may want to part away with very little. 2 reasons – 1) They know that they can only have an influence on the govt formation, in case of MGB coming to power, if they have enough seats and for which they need to first contest at least as many seats and 2) Whatever the supposedly unbiased media say RaGa v/s Modi would go only 1 way and hence more seats to Cong could mean winnability coming down and eventually less seats for MGB which would be detrimental to govt. formation or keeping Modi at bay which is their main intent.

So, where it leaves the congress, the darling of the Lutyens media and Intellects. Let us split the states into 4 main categories – states where MGB (which includes Cong) would be stronger going by the arithmetic; where Cong is in direct fight with BJP; states where the powerful regional party for now is keeping distance with both BJP/Cong; NE/smaller states/UT accounting for very less LS seats. While doing this analysis I realized that Cong on its own is not strong any more except for say Punjab and to some extent Kerala, some may claim the same for Rajasthan, but I would like to give BJP the lead here as well given that this is for LS and Modi factor would be a huge one. In this analysis I shall be more generous to them, but the reality may be far harsher.

Category 1 – MGB (Bihar, J&K – less seats though, K’taka, Kerala, Maha, TN, UP and WB) as such may look stronger on paper as all parties, assuming Left would join them given the clarion call by Mamata that everyone has to make sacrifices, fighting against 1 party BJP should get more votes logically. These contribute more than half the seats out of 543. The challenge for Cong is to extract seats though which looks highly unlikely given their electoral performance in these states except to some extent Kerala and K’taka. My prediction is that they wouldn’t get to fight in double digit seats in any of these states except for K’taka (situation may change if HDK changes tack). They could end up fighting just 70-80 seats out of these. SP and BSP would want to fight in at least 30 seats each in UP, Mamata may not part with more than 5 or 6 as she could sweep even if she goes alone, RJD may not want to lose their grip further and it would worsen if JD (U) comes back. Maha may see them getting good share of seats but could spell trouble if Shiv Sena joins MGB. Even if we assume 50-60% strike rate which is a very high strike rate but could be a possibility as the allies could transfer their votes they may win only around 35-40 seats out of huge chunk of 300+ seats.

Category 2 – Direct Fight (Assam, Chhattisgarh, Goa, Guj, Haryana, HP, Jharkhand, MP, Punjab, Raj, U’khand, Delhi) – Some of these states they may have some junior partners like JMM in J’Khand but largely they would be fighting directly against BJP (NDA in Punjab). They could get to fight the majority of the 160 seats here. Since 2013, Cong has slipped rapidly when pitched directly against BJP/Modi and I don’t see that changing even with all the hype of hugs and winks and the claim that RaGa has come of age. Modi’s popularity has not diminished, though MSM may want us to believe so, to the extent he would lose in a direct fight to Cong. With these reasons, I don’t see them winning more than 40% of these seats – so, could win around 60 seats – as I said I am being generous here to assume best case scenario for them. As of now, AAP seem to be out of MGB and hence in Delhi and Punjab they will very well be in the fray and spoil Cong chances even further.

Category 3 – AP, Orissa and Telangana – 63 seats – The regional players here could stay out of both MGB/NDA. Andhra could change with TDP changing spots. Even if TDP allies with Congress/MGB I don’t see Cong winning more than 10 seats (very much on the higher side).  The most could come from Andhra and they may not even open their account in Orissa and Telangana. AP has Jagan and if Pawan Kalyan too jumps into the fray and/or if they join hands or go with BJP or if TDP doesn’t join MGB this number could come down by half.

Category 4 – NE and all small states/UT not covered in the above categories – 17 seats – They could win around 5 seats here.

So, where do they end up? With anywhere between 110-120 seats? Will that be sufficient for them to get their Prince to rule – highly unlikely. Is this why their senior leader and former FM PC said Cong would like to triple the seats that they have now – a very low/modest target but closer to reality? This is the best-case scenario for the Cong which doesn’t look rosy.

This is just the short-term picture. In my opinion conceding so much space to the regional parties would erode their party organization even further, frustrate more people who could quit, demoralize their supporters. Hence, this will hurt them more in the long run and will take more time for them to regroup and come back to power on their own or even reach 2009 levels. Will it then make sense for them to go alone and try to build their organization for the long haul instead of some immediate gains? The Lutyens media wouldn’t think so as they don’t care for Cong but only for themselves. They want Modi out so that they can gain/bargain even if it at the expense of the party they are supporting. The intellects would try to convince their master with the claim that they have to stay afloat and be relevant now and hence should take this route.

There are enough people with brains in Cong to show them the mirror but most of them unfortunately stay subservient to the dynasty and go with the flow and the rest would be the elders who wouldn’t want to care too much into the future. Eventually, this could lead to the slogan that Modi coined “Cong-Mukt Bharat” to come true – where the Cong is not wiped out physically but the Cong ideology, their way of thinking gets routed out. I am not complaining. However, having said that, it would be a nightmare if MGB comes to power even with a depleted Congress.  So many parties with 20-30 odd seats each controlling the govt, each fighting for their own benefits could ruin the country. That again is a separate topic of discussion for some other time.

भोर

0

भोर रात और दिन की संधि का ऐसा समय है जब अंधकार अपने अस्तित्व के मिटने के भय से कंपित होता है और प्रकाश सूर्य की कोख से निकलकर विस्तार पाने को आतुर होता है। इस समय जागृत निशाचरों और सुप्त दिवाचरों, दोनों में बराबर की हलचल होती है।

प्रकाश होते ही निशाचरों की आंखें चौंधिया जाती हैं। वे अपनी आंखें बंद कर किसी अंधेरे कोने में जाकर छुप जाना चाहते हैं। उनके कर्तव्य की सीमा का बोध उन्हें निष्क्रिय कर देता है। वे रात्रि के पुनरागमन की प्रतीक्षा करते हैं।

परंतु भोर का महत्व निशाचरों की निष्क्रियता में नहीं। भोर का महत्व उन सुप्त दिवाचरों के लिए है जिनके जीवन की हर आवश्यकता प्रकाश पर निर्भर करती है। इनमें से कुछ जागृत होकर सूर्य की प्रथम किरण के प्रति कृतज्ञता व्यक्त करते हैं किंतु यह भी मानते हैं कि आगे के कर्म उन्हें स्वयं करने हैं।

अधिकतर आलस्य के मारे लेटे रहते हैं, आंखें मूंदकर रात होने का ही आभास करते हैं और फ़िर सूर्य की तपिश बढ़ जाने पर कुढ़ते हैं।

कुछ ऐसे होते हैं जिनपर निशाचरी प्रवृत्ति का प्रभाव होता है। ये देर तक सोने के बाद सूर्य को कोसने लगते हैं उनकी निद्रा भंग करने के लिए। लंबा शयन इन्हें अकर्मण्य बना चुका होता है और ये सूर्य को ही सारे कार्य करने और फल देने का उत्तरदायी मानते हैं।

सूर्य के आगमन से भोर होती है, उसके प्रकाश और तप का प्रभाव बढ़ता है तो संसार में सर्वांगीण उन्नति और प्रगति का मार्ग प्रशस्त होता है। परंतु सूर्य न किसी का कर्म करने का दायी है न कर्मफल देने का। उसका काम कर्म करने की ऊर्जा प्रदान करना है जो वह निर्बाध, निश्छल और निर्भेद करता है। कौन कितना आगे बढ़ेगा, यह उसके अपने कर्म पर निर्भर है, सूर्य के तप और ऊर्जा को वह कितनी दक्षता से उपयोग करता है, इसपर निर्भर है।

भारतवर्ष में भोर-बेला का प्रारंभ हो चुका है। सूर्य अपनी समस्त ऊर्जा इसे समर्पित करने को प्रस्तुत है, प्रयासरत है। अब राष्ट्र के अपने कर्म उसकी नियति का निर्धारण करेंगे।

Matrubhumi- 2

0

What is my country?

Land of Human Civilisation

Land of Himalayas and Sahyadris

Land of Rivers (Ganga, Yamuna, Brahmaputra, Godavari, Tungabhadra)

Land of Avatars (Vishnu – Matsya, Kurm, Varah, Narsimh, Waman, Parshuram, Ram, Krishna, Buddha, Kalki, 12 jyotirlings of Shiv).

Land of Arihant, Siddh, Upadhyay.

Land of God’s and Goddess’s (Indra/Indrani, Agni, Yama/Yami…)

Land of Rishis / Rishi patnis (Yadnyvalkya/Maitreyi/Gargi, Agasti/Lopamudra, Atri/Anusuya, Jamadagni/Renuka, Vashishth, Vishwamitra…)

Land of Acharyas (Shankaracharya, Ramanujacharya, Madhavacharya, Vallabhacharya, Nimbakacharya).

Land of Sikh Gurus (Guru Nanakdevji, Guru Angaddevji, Guru Amardasji, Guru Ramdasji, Guru Arjanji, Guru Har Gobindji, Guru Har Raiji, Guru Har Krishanji, Guru Teg Bahadurji and Guru Govindsinhji)

Land of Saints (Namdeo, Dnyaneshwar, Tukaram, Eknath, Tiruvalluvar, Narsinh Mehta, Kabir, Tulsidas and Meerabai…)

Land of non believers (Charvak…).

Land of scientists (Aryabhat, Brahmagupta, Vishweshvaraya, J.C.Bose, C.V.Raman, Dr.A.P.J.Abdul Kalam…).

Land of mathematicians (Aryabhat, Bhaskar, Ramanuj…)

Land of historians / poets(Valmiki, Ved Vyas, Kalidas…)

Land of nation builders (Chanakya and Sardar Patel…)

Land of Kings (Chandragupta, Samudragupta, Ashok, Harsh, Pulakeshi II, Raja Raja Chola, Krishnadevraya, Rana Pratap and Shivaji…).

Land of Dynasties (Maurya’s, Gupta’s, Chola’s, Satvahan’s, Pallava’s, Chalukya’s, Satkarni’s).

Land of Holy books (Veda’s, Brahmans, Aaranyaks, Upanishads, Aagams, Shreemad Bhagwadgeeta, Brahmasutra, Puranas, Ramayan, Mahabharat…)

Land of Reformers (Swami Vivekanand, Swami Dayanand Saraswati, Raja Ram Mohan Roy, Lokmanya Bal Gangadhar Tilak, Swatantryaveer Savarkar, Dr. B.R.Ambedkar, Mahatma Jyotiba Phule, Savitribhai Phule, Maharshi Dhondo Keshav Karve…)

Land of Revolutionaries (Rani Laxmibai, Tatya Tope, Mangal Pandey, Vasudeo Balwant Phadke, Chandrasekhar Azad, Bhagat Singh, Ramprasad Bismill, Khudiram Bose…)

This list is endless (I have missed out many) as the thoughts go on pouring out of my mind into this paper.

My country is what I relate with!

Is it just a piece of land or is it just a handful of states? Is it Her people? Is it the boundaries that mankind has drawn on maps sitting in their cosy rooms? Is it Her thoughts? Is She what I see ? What I hear ? What I know ?

The answer comes back to me and resonates

“MY COUNTRY IS WHAT I FEEL”

She’s my Mother, who in Her bosoms, takes care of me as Her child and looks after all my needs daily. Doesn’t She do it for you too, my reader?

Answer this question and you will know what your country is for you!!!

At the same time I know that it is a piece of land having boundaries, which I have to protect. It is Her people with whom I have to live with. It is Her thoughts which will help me survive. She is what I see, what I hear and what I know.

My country is “Bharat”.

The name derived from :

1. Shakuntaley Bharat

2. Ram anuj Bharat

3. Jad Bharat

Bharat means “devoted to light”, “devoted to knowledge”. Bharat is a land of spiritually self enlightened people.

And hence our seers have rightly said “दुर्लभं भारते जन्म”. It is a rarity to get to spend one’s life in this land called Bharat.

She is diverse, yet united.

She is divided into states, yet one.

Her children speak different languages, yet the language of everyone’s heart is same, the language of love, warmth and affection.

Her children wear different clothes, yet their colours are same, Kesari, White, Green and Blue.

She prays and says

“सर्वे सुखिनः सन्तु, सर्वे सन्तु निरामया:,
सर्वे भद्राणि पश्यन्तु, मा कश्चिद् दुःख भाग्भवेत्।।
ऊँ शांतिः शांतिः शांतिः।।”

It just goes on and on and on, only to make me realise that it will take more than one Life to see Bharat, hear Bharat and understand Bharat.

Jay Bharat

Matrubhumi: 1

0

I vow to thee, my country
All earthly things above
Entire and whole and perfect
The service of my love

The love that asks no questions
The love that stands the test
That lays upon the alter
The dearst and the best
The love that never falters
The love that pays the price
The love that makes undaunted
The final sacrifice
And there’s another country
I’ve heard of long ago
Most dear to them that love her
Most great to them I know
We may not count her armies
We may not see her King
Her fortress is a faithful heart
Her pride is suffering
And soul by soul and silently
Her shining bounds increase
And her ways are ways of gentleness
And all her paths are peace

– Sir Cecil Spring Rice…

A poem learnt in the Standard 10 of my school days still resonates at the same frequency today as it did many years back.

Sir Cecil has written about two countries here, his own motherland (Great Britain) and everyone’s motherland (Kingdom of God). He sets a very sombre tone at the beginning and then it culminates into a high pitch by the time it reaches its end. I still remember asking my teacher.

“Why has he written about two kingdoms? It’s so confusing, Mam!”

Naturally the question had come out of fear of literature exam then, but my teacher, as experienced as she was, a devout Christian, answered,

“Boy, whatever you want achieve in life you have to strive for it, but at the same time, take care to, serve your nation too. Don’t forget your nation which spends all its time, resources and energy for you.”

“And at the same time also think about life after death. We all believe in it in one way or the other. We all have to strive to enter His Kingdom too, to find eternal peace. Here Sir Cecil through his poem is reminding us about it.”

I frankly didn’t understand about His Kingdom and eternal peace at that time, nor do I do it now as a whole, but the first few verses still make me excited just by the idea of serving one’s own Motherland

A few years later…

Had grown up. Started attending lectures (Pravachans) of Pujaniya Pandurang Shashtriji Athavale. He while talking about Bhumi (land) as one of the five elements (Panchtatva) while explaining “Panchchame” from one of the verses of Yajurveda explained thus,

“One has to respect the land on which he/she is born and needs to be dedicated to it. All those who learn here and go and earn in other countries find those beautiful and his/her own country unclean and dirty should be drowned into the seas” He went on to explain “How can one forget the love and warmth a person has got from this land! And what about the economic expenses (subsidies) She has borne for you! Forget all that but how can one detach from his/her mother! How can one call mother dirty! All such people are a blot for their own country.”

(Am writing just a gist of what he has said. Any translation mistake is mine alone)

It resonates my feeling that “An Indian should be dedicated to India in the same way as a Brit is to Britain and a American is to America. For Indians, it should be India first”.

A few days back…

I come in touch with a boy. Know him through mutual friends. The best part is that we haven’t met yet but we both feel that we no two different people. After some initial days of chat he props up a question?

“What is a Pracharak?”

And shares that he wants to be one.

Am amazed by his clarity of thought. (Generally at his age of 17/18 boys have only two things to do. Attend college and impress a girl) I have cross questioned him a lot to the best of my abilities and Yes, am convinced about what we can do for our motherland.

All these everlasting memories and imprints have triggered me to write a blog and express and share my feelings and understanding about my Motherland, our Motherland, India, that is, Bharat….

What is my country?

What is the idea of Bharat?

What is the essence of being an Indian?

What is love for motherland?

And many more…

I plan to write a few blogs and try to find answers to my questions.

Should journalists be mere mouthpieces?

0

Like a Hollywood studio production line, doomsday scripts are deluging us. But as we know scripts can be scary; they need not necessarily be true.

In the search for a good story we cannot cross the boundaries of grace and indeed, of truth. Far too often these days the truth is becoming too large, too inconvenient, a burden to carry. Quotes are tampered with, conclusions need not derive from facts. And news anchors routinely shout down guests who dare to have an opinion different from the one that the channel seeks to propagate.

News anchors must learn that aggression is a state of mind, they are yet to recognize that it is not a moment to show off the range of expletives you possess. As Gandhiji said, ‘In a gentle way you can shake the world’.

A news channel by its very nomenclature, tells the ‘news’. It doesn’t gossip, it can’t clothe conspiracy theories in holier garb because once it does so it no longer has the moral right to claim to be the ‘news’. It worries me as well that more and more young men and women are getting obsessed with reporting what happens off the field rather than on it. Should journalists be mere mouthpieces?

Why the hurry behind the Anti-Trafficking Bill 2018 is justified

A certain section of the civil society has raised concerns over the hastiness that is being rendered in passing of the Anti-Trafficking Bill, 2018. The said section of the civil society and certain individual members and experts are of the opinion that the Bill must be referred to the Standing Committee that it may be able to plug in the loopholes the bill has been found guilty of.

In this respect it’s imperative to review some facts that place into perspective the haste in which the passing of the Bill is being carried out.

In 2015, the Prajwala Vs. Union of India & Ors. in WP(C) No. 56/2004, the Hon’ble Supreme Court of India directed that the requirements put forth by the petitioner, can only be addressed through bringing about a new comprehensive legislation on trafficking. Consequently, in August 2015 the process of formulation began with a multi stakeholder committee established for its preliminary drafting. In May 2016, the Ministry placed the draft on its website for public suggestions. All subsequent drafts of the Bill were also shared on the website of the Ministry of Women and Child Development, and comments and suggestions were invited by anyone who wished to do so.

Over a period of almost three years, all relevant stakeholders and civil society at large were consulted at all stages of formulation of the Bill, and their suggestions incorporated. The Ministry independently also received 300 suggestions from the public and civil society. We rather bound then that after an over two-year long consultative process, compliance with the directions of the apex Court is met.

Secondly, despite ratifying to the Protocol to Prevent, Suppress and Punish Trafficking in Persons especially women and children, supplementing the United Nations Convention against Transnational Organized Crime in 2011, India doesn’t have any specific law that comprehensively and holistically deals with the organized crime perspective, covering all aspects of trafficking. This Bill is an attempt to comprehensively deal with trafficking taking special care for the social reintegration and rehabilitation of victims, especially minors in line with international requirements.

Lastly, it is imperative to note that the nation-wide issue of trafficking mustn’t and shouldn’t be gilded with political agendas. The issue of trafficking is a non-political issue, and political bias will dilute and thereby eclipse this evil that is glaring at us. Trafficking is a matter not of political discourse and personal agenda. The utmost urgency that the issue calls for must then be reflected in the collective agreement on the passage of the Bill that understands the urgency and the immediate need to effectively intervene through law to combat this crime.

If the Bill were to wait for the winter session, which is predicted to be a wash-out session, the country will be consciously delaying the enforcement of a much needed stringent law that could and shall benefit so many of us, needlessly to say especially the women and children.

The question then must rather be, “Why is the government NOT in haste to pass the Anti-Trafficking Bill, 2018? We must then subtly remind ourselves, time is of the essence!

On 26th June 2018, the Trafficking of Persons (Prevention, Protection, Rehabilitation) Bill, 2018 was presented in the Lok Sabha and was unanimously passed by the House. However, few glaring misconceptions that have clouded the current Bill must duly be considered and addressed.

It has been contested that the sex workers have categorically opposed the Bill, since its very inception. The singling out of the sex work shows a narrow reading of the Bill that aims to not only uphold the agency and choice of the sex worker but also gives rehabilitative benefits to the victim. It is important to clarify, that the bill categorically does not criminalise sex work or sex workers and upholds their constitutional rights.

Does the Bill really target the sex workers?
The Bill views trafficking not just by the type of labour performed but the conditions or processes or manner through which such work is conducted. Trafficking is therefore, not determined by the sexualised nature of the ‘work’ performed, but instead upon the conditions or processes that the worker (he or she) may be subjected to. Specially, if a person willingly engages in any activity where the person has been deceived of the nature of the work (where threat and deception is involved) and is subject to exploitative condition, the inherent nature of sex work stands to be involuntary and ill-defined.

Drawing from the recommendations of the Justice Verma Committee, Section 370 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 was amended in 2013 to add the explanation of the word exploitation, further that the ‘consent of the victim is immaterial in determination of the offence of trafficking’ emphasizes the nature and gravity of the crime through the means so states ‘coercion, force, abuse of threat etc. has been addressed. However, the Bill takes this a step ahead and reiterates how ‘consent should never be a factor in determining which victims of abuse deserve assistance’ (Foerster: 2009). The applicability of the Bill therefore goes beyond the scope of the IPC provisions and existing provisions of even Immoral Trafficking Prevention Act, 1956 that specifically deals with sex trade or the act of prostitution without explicitly criminalizing it.

What does Agency and Social Morality mean for the Rule of Law?
During the reading of the Bill, Tharoor explicitly questions the agency of the sex workers being undermined through the Bill. Quite contrary, the Bill in fact upholds the agency of the sex worker by giving them the option of accepting or declining long-term rehabilitation. The agency of the victim is kept at its center by realizing the autonomy of a sentient being to make choices that have not been forced and are well founded upon free choice. Such a reading of agency is central to the Bill in its provisions and aspects so provided.

In supposedly stating the position of the sex workers, Tharoor appealed to the Minister to “view the matters of right and laws through the lens of constitutional morality and not the majoritarian social morality”. He constructively fails to understand the inherent linkage between law and morality and questions the ‘internal morality of law’ (Joseph Raz: 2012) and principles of natural justice that builds the backbone of Indian legislature. Constitutional morality has not only been upheld but emphasised and exemplified in the Bill through its adherence to the provisions of Article 21 and Article 23 of the Constitution. Social majoritarian morality is in fact what he is representing by undermining constitutional guarantees in light of personal opinions about individual groups.

As you finish reading this article at least one child would have been trafficked in India. It is important thereby to not delay the coming of a new law that addresses trafficking offences and provides recourse to those victimized. The referral to the Standing Committee is a constitutional provision that must judiciously be used and not exploited as a norm. The Bill is the need of the hour, and all objections so raised are concerns on its implementation and applicability framework and can be sufficiently solved in the formation of the Rules.

Thereby, I reiterate Mr. Satyarthi’s concern, “For children cannot wait. The nation cannot wait.”

Arguments- For and against special category status to Andhra Pradesh & futile No Confidence Motion

0

The recent No-Confidence motion moved on the NDA-Govt at the Centre by the Telugu Desam Party (TDP)-led- Andhra Pradesh M.Ps, was an exercise in futility. The discussion in the Parliament was on A.P. State Re-Organisation Act-2014. However, the TDP tried to highlight its fetish for Special Category Status (SCS) to Andhra Pradesh. But the special status, got mired in arguments with the Centre in a substantiative special package/assitance proposed by it. The BJP led- NDA government had won the confidence-vote handsomely on 20th July, i.e beginning of current session (of July-Aug, 2018) in the Lok Sabha. The defeat, though anticipated and expected by the A.P Govt, given the might of the Central Govt, it had demoralised the TDP for the strident stand it had taken vis-à-vis the Centre.

The TDP, being the largest beneficiary (compared to Telangana Rastra Samithi-TRS) for aligning with the BJP at Centre all through for four years, had cut off its lifeline of late with the Centre only for not granting Special Category Status to A. P. Otherwise they would not have had any tangible issues to differ with. The ‘Majority versus Morality’ issue raised after the debacle by the C.M of A.P did not stand to reason. It’s a non-sequitur.

It does not augur well for Chandra Babu Naidu to make a sweeping statement (Majority Vs Morality) that infers being in the majority in itself defies morality. Having morality means being on a minority side, and therefore being a sufferer. In any Parliamentary democracy the numerical strength matters. The whole episode of Special Category Status to A.P was a re-ignition by Jagan Mohan Reddy’s YSRCP for its existence and relevance in the states’ polity. Pawan Kalyan of Jana Sakthi Party followed suit. No doubt it is an emotive issue to Andhras. These two parties’ hue and cry for the SCS has been well-received by all Andhraites. That tempted Chandra Babu Naidu to take the similar stance. That’s the reason why the PM in his speech on no-confidence motion said that Chandra Babu fell into the snare laid down by the YSRCP.

All through these four-years (2014-’18), Naidu used the Centre like a milch cow to gain financial benefits. He did not utter a single word against Special Package granted by the Centre in lieu of SCS in 2016 when it was announced. In fact, he promoted that package deal to the people of A.P to the hilt. He took up the national irrigation project- Polavaram into his hands, as it had massive fund allocation, despite the Central Government’s insistence to be built by them. He messed up the financial supplies by not spending them for intended purposes, is a fact and also a revelation by the Enforcement Directorate.

All the five southern states i.e the Tamil Nadu, Karnataka, Kerala, Telangana and Andhra Pradesh vie with one another to get corporates and industrialists to invest in their states. They also develop the infrastructure and try to fulfill the aspirations of the people by incentivising and by giving sops to the needed. The Anna canteens started by the TDP serve food at cheaper price for the down-trodden. Similarly, farm-loans waivers, agricultural loans, oldage-pension- increase (in tune with the inflation) etc though populist measures, are necessary schemes that cause revenue-deficit. The A.P Govt seeks Centre’s assistance to compensate the loss due to these subsidies as it being a newly-formed state. The Centre has been saying that it cannot compensate them for the reason that- one state formulation applies to all.

As Galla Jaydev, M.P from TDP said in his speech, the state A.P, competes with its contiguous states and compares with its immediate neighbours in the matters of development rather than the likes of some north or north-eastern states which are distant. So, it cannot be disqualified for SCS that has been given to north-eastern states, on the basis that the state A.P, is more developed than them, which is illogical. As a new state,with the loss of revenue generating Hyderabad city to Telangana, A.P; needs to be financially on the firmer-footing with the Centre’s granting of SCS, was his argument.

There is an impression in Andhra Pradesh that if special status is accorded, the state gets tax-benefit/exemption so that many industrialists would set-up their plants for the youth of Andhra to get jobs. It’s but natural for industrialists to flock around a tax-free state. Of course, that kind of status brings neighbours envy and owners pride.

The Prime Minister in his no -confidence motion speech assured A.P. of all help. However,he said that three-years ago, in the same Parliament-House, it was Veeraappa Moily, the tall Ex-Congress Minister and the M.P now from Karnataka opposed granting Special Category Status to A.P by saying that it would bring inequity and inequality among all other southern states. If such is the case, how can the Congress promise and ensure now to award SCS to Andhra Pradesh? Would it forgo its voters in Karnataka? The people of Andhra Pradesh had been very loyal to the Congress until it bifurcated the state. The Andhraites were simply jettisoned by the Congress for want of Telangana votes, which anyway they could not muster. As the P.M stated in no-confidence move, the Congress just botched up the whole bifurcation of A.P and Telangana states, as it did with the partition of the country into two, India and Pakistan.

The CM of A.P. Chandra Babu is known for his flip-flops. It is said that he was instrumental in advancing the parliamentary-elections in 2004. For, he was attacked by Naxals when he was travelling in Tirupati-Tirumala ghat road near the Alipiri junction. Luckily, he escaped the attempt on his life and gained sympathy from all. So, he called for elections of the Centre to take place along with the state of A.P then. In that elections, both in state and at Centre, the NDA lost power to the Congress-led UPA. It was indeed a bad move. However, for the loss he blamed the BJP to be the cause and had sworn that he would never associate with it any longer. Next in 2009 elections, Chandra Babu joined hands with CPI and CPM but could not gain power. Then realisation dawned on him to associate with the BJP once again under Modi-leadership to win the elections of 2014.

The BJP’s loss of two recent by-elections in Utter Pradesh (Khairana and Phoolpur) in the hands of combined opposition and also its defeat in Gorakhpur made Chandra Babu emboldened. He, taking cue from some media groups, came to the conclusion that the BJP was no more a force to reckon with and he could withdraw his support to fight the electoral battle of 2019 on his own merit.

Every leader of BJP, be it Rajnath Singh– the Home Minister, Piyush Goyal– the Finance Minister and the Prime Minister agreed that Andhra Pradesh was not fairly dealt with in bifurcation process and the newly-formed state needed Centre’s support. They ensured a splendid package and assured to carry out all the state re-organisational promises. In this scenario, it appears that Chandra Babu Naidu snapped the ties with the BJP without much fore-thought. Not only that, ever since he withdrew the support, he and his party cadre began excoriating the BJP and its top leadership in the public glare. It is difficult now to bridge the chasm between the two.

In the picture unfolding now, the Congress, desperate to get back Andhra voters to its fold, is promising SCS- including other privileges guaranteed by the House in Feb-2014, during the UPA regime by then P.M Man Mohan Singh. The BJP has been saying the 14-Finance Commission has not discriminated special and general category states in the matter of  fund-allocation. The BJP leaders also said (while speaking on no-confidence motion) that they care people of A.P. and that there was no constraint for funding and they were committed in letter and spirit to implement whatever was given in the state re-organisation plan.

The YSRCP and Pawan Kalyan’s Jana Sakthi Party stated categorically that they would only align with a party at Centre that would grant special status to A.P. Now, the Congress having promised the status, it may not be an untouchable to them. Moreover, YSRCP-a splinter group of the Congress, has a natural affinity towards it. Similarly, the voters of the BJP and the TDP are akin in emotions tastes and feelings. The coming together of the TDP and BJP is a saving grace to both the parties. The special package as per the Centre, includes a Railway-zone, roads, ports, educational institutions etc; are all beneficial to the state. The youth of A.P. would get primier academic bodies like the  IITs, IIMs, AIAMs and industries of repute to pursue their jobs/ careers. All in all, the state will definitely prosper. It is for the good of both parties (TDP&BJP) to bury the hatchet and move on.

Sources:

TDP’s Ram Mohan Naidu:  https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jCxDhyvhNqk&feature=youtu.be

Shri. Shrujana Chowdary-TDP: https://youtu.be/1C01cjkNI38

Shri. C M Ramesh Speech-TDP: in Telugu https://youtu.be/fBP9gTck1y0

Intent vs ability- Why BJP seems to have its heart in the right place

0

‘BJP has done nothing for Hindus’. ‘They are no different from Congress’. ‘They have just used Hindus as a springboard to get to power and left them in the lurch after that’. These quotes sound familiar, don’t they?

If you are BJP supporter then more often than not, you would have at least heard these quotes, if not used them yourself. Ever since BJP came to power, they have been under constant scrutiny of media, opponents and not so surprisingly of their own supporters. Former accused BJP of pursuing unabashed pro Hindu policies, whereas at the same time latter feels let down because of BJP not pursuing those very policies enough.

Let’s look at some of the common reasons cited by upset BJP supporters:

  1. Even after 4 years in power Anti-Hindu RTE stays
  2. Temples are still under government control
  3. Challenges arising due to demographic changes caused by growing minority population have not been addressed
  4. They haven’t done much about their usual commitments of repealing Art 370, resettling Kashmiri Pandits in the valley and bringing Uniform Civil Code.

None of the above mentioned concerns are unreasonable. However, there is little to suggest that voting BJP out would improve the situation on any of the above. Far from it, situation is likely to be worse if fate of Hindus in some of the non BJP states like West Bengal is anything to go by.

At the same time it would be naive to think that BJP leadership is unaware of backlash from core Hindu voters and are ignoring Hindu issues for some minority votes which have eluded them so far.

Is BJP vote-bloc a monolith?

Unlike Congress, BJP supporters or more specifically their voters in 2014 were anything but monolithic. More so 2014 election was very different from all preceding elections. Here’s why,

Year 1996 1998 1999 2004 2009 2014
Total Votes (in mil) 336 375 364 387 417 553
BJP Votes (in mil) 68 96 87 86 78 172
Cong Votes (in mil) 96 98 103 103 119 107
BJP Vote share % 20.29% 25.59% 23.75% 22.20% 18.80% 31%

http://eci.nic.in/eci_main/archiveofge2014/2%20-%20HIGHLIGHTS_04122014.pdf

https://data.gov.in/resources/status-political-parties-election-lok-sabha-house-people-2009-states

What’s interesting is the unprecedented 33% growth in overall votes polled. If numbers were anything to go by this was the most participated election. If meager growth in voting numbers between 1996 to 2009 showed voters apathy, then quantum jump in the next 5 years exemplified hopes and expectations. If we analyse these numbers further BJP gained 94 mil votes out of the additional 136 mil votes polled i.e 68% or roughly 2/3 of the new votes- a fair assumption to make, as contrary to public perception Congress retained 90% of its core votes. By again looking closely at these numbers we can conclude that Congress has around 100 mil loyal voters, whereas loyal voters for BJP who have stayed with the party even when they had no chance of winning can be estimated to be between 75-80 mil.

The reason for putting out these numbers is to highlight the key non-core voters will hold for BJP in its bid for re-election in 2019.

Voters of BJP: Hardcore vs Non Core

Let’s analyse the hardcore BJP voters, historically they’ve been supported by traders and small businessmen harassed by Congress during license permit raj, as well as working class Hindus who resented minority appeasement politics of Congress since independence. The party also shored up its pro Hindu image after Ram Janmabhoomi movement which created the awakening and millions of Hindus gyrated towards BJP. However, BJP couldn’t add much to it’s core vote base after coming to power in late 90s and instead played on development and inclusiveness to earn some non core voters and stitched new alliances needed for forming government.But the inability to convert non core voters into hardcore ones came back to haunt them in 2004 and 2009.

Fast forward to 2014 , emergence of Modi (painted by media as a Hindu hardliner) assured hardcore voters to campaign for the party in the hope of seeing an end to appeasement politics, whereas development oriented image from his Gujarat CM days appealed to new voters many of whom had hitherto no any political loyalties.

Has BJP really deserted it’s core voters?

Finally, I’ll talk about the main purpose for writing this article. Has BJP betrayed its core voters? Answer to that lies in two things, one is intent and the other ability. Let’s talk about the intent first. Let’s look at few things BJP has done for Hindus or at least tried doing in the last 4 years.

  1. Stopped Mining at Trikuta Hills where Vaishnodevi Temple is situated – Under the pretext of mining the erstwhile Congress-NC government had created a ground for encroachment of temple land. BJP after coming to power protected it.
  2. BJP Debunked the fake ‘Hindu Terror’ bogey which was coined by Congress to send Hindus on a perennial guilt trip.
  3. PM has Promoted Hinduism to the world by carrying it on his sleeves during all foreign visits.
  4. Government has embarked on an ambitious project to build all weather road to make Badrinath and Kedarnath accessible in all seasons.
  5. Ramayan circuit to promote Hindu culture and heritage.
  6. Released Religious Census report data to highlight demographic changes- This was concealed by Congress for 3 years.
  7. Ended Haj Subsidy- Although it was done because of SC diktat, we often forget that diktat called for removal of it by 2022
  8. Fast-tracked NRC- National Registry of Citizens to identify illegal Bangladeshis in Assam and 4 mil illegal immigrants have been identified in the draft.
  9. Tried deportation of Rohingyas -Again SC scuppered its efforts.
  10. Settled long pending LBA(Land Boundary agreement) with Bangladesh to earmark disputed enclaves and fast-tracked fencing of borders.
  11. Promoted firebrand yet no nonsense leaders like Yogi Adityanath- BJP always had the option of a moderate face like Rajnath Singh than someone perceived to be a hardliner like Yogi.
  12. While all of the above points talk about their intent , I will now talk about their ability.

Yes BJP hasn’t been able to move courts for faster resolution of Ram Mandir case, yes they haven’t done enough to resettle Kashmiri Pandits or scrap RTE, or they haven’t removed temples from state control (though they had put this in their manifesto for Karnataka elections) . Here at the risk of annoying many hardcore supporters, i would cut BJP some slack. They inherited a system where minority appeasement is institutionalized and watched closely by an ecosystem waiting to pounce on them at every opportunity, they might have thought against picking some avoidable battles with no major gain.

Any hardcore supporter would wonder whether BJP was not voted to changing the status quo or on the promise to build Ram Mandir and end minority appeasement? I am no political expert, but can be certain of political acumen of BJP leadership, they for sure understand that minority appeasement won’t get them any votes and I don’t think that they are targeting minorities either.

It’s the non core voters we have seen in the above table that BJP is ostensibly chasing in two ways. Long term approach of converting them into hard core voters through membership drive, outreach programmes on social media as well as monthly Mann Ki Baat interactions. And the short term one by keeping them with the party through development initiatives. While Ram Mandir resonates well with the electorate in parts of UP,it won’t appeal to majority of voters in Metros or Tier 1 towns where infrastructure, jobs and prices are more pressing issues . It would also not work with farmers affected by drought. We must not forget that they all form the part of non core vote bloc

While I certainly attest that more needs to be done by the party to address concerns of it’s core voters , it also needs to be appreciated that for any long term solution BJP should be in power for long. And for staying in power, converting or at least retaining non core voters would be essential. Any posturing from the BJP leadership needs to be seen from that perspective.

PS- Since I fall into the category of hardcore supporters, I too am upset with the party not keeping it’s supporters happy, but I feel challenges are too daunting for the them. I still believe that BJP has it’s heart in the right place, but inability and/or lack of experience is getting the better of them as far as the issues of hard core supporters are concerned. To borrow a metaphor from cricket, since the track is bowler friendly, priority for the batting side at the moment would be to save wickets, keep rotating the strike with ones and two’s to keep the scoreboard ticking and focus on big hits later on.

The terrorism of cow mafia safely shielded by MSM

We all hear about the news of “cow vigilance”. There are two general kind of cases regarding “cow vigilance” where a mob has taken law in its own hands:

1. When someone was suspected of having eaten beef
2. When someone was suspected of smuggling cows through vehicles.

I start it by making it very clear that any kind of lynching is wrong and those involved in it deserve to be legally punished. Having said that, if we ponder upon the “second kind” of cases, which is, when someone was suspected of smuggling cows, it takes our attention towards a very serious issue which deserves our high attention, the issue of CATTLE MAFIA.

Whenever a mob lynch a cattle smuggler, MSM takes no time to paint entire incident with colour of religion but this is not truth in many of the cases. Many of the times, it is ordinary people who in order to protect their cows (the source of their livelihood) attack cow smugglers. And such cases receive much attention but not those where cow smugglers attack ordinary people and security forces. So this article compile 15 such cases happened in past few years.

CASE 1:
It was reported on 7th July 2018 that in Meghalaya, cow smugglers in a village attacked 6 people, out of them, 3 died and rest 3 were heavily injured. And as per villagers, the headman and other villagers, earlier this week, had apprehended the main accused when he was trying to smuggle cattle to Bangladesh.

Read the full report here: 3 killed by suspected cow smugglers in Meghalaya

CASE 2:
Two girls, while moving in a car noticed a vehicle which was carrying many cows. Seeing the brutal condition of cows, those two girls chased down the vehicle and asked driver to stop it. As a consequence, the driver attacked them, but the two girls were lucky enough that they were not injured.

Read the full news report here: British NRI, friend shot at by cattle smugglers in Gurugram 

CASE 3:
This incident is of Uttar Pradesh. When a home guard was doing his duty, he saw a vehicle transporting cows. When he made efforts to stop the vehicle, cow smugglers fired a bullet on home guard which seriously injured him.

Read the full news report here: गौ तस्करों ने कोबरा ड्यिूटी कर रहे होमगार्ड को मारी गोली

CASE 4:
Two policemen who were on patrol duty saw a group of 5-7 people transporting cows in a mini truck. When the tried to stop those cow smugglers, they opened fired on policemen. This case is from Rajasthan.

Read the full news report here: Rajasthan Police Gun Down Haryana Man Who Was Suspected Of Smuggling Cows

CASE 5:
A similar case was reported in Ambala where cattle smugglers open fired on a policeman. The policeman was fortunate that he escaped the attack. Later, a complaint was registered against those cattle smugglers.

Full report: Cattle smugglers shoot at police vehicle

CASE 6:
People of Nurpur Village received information that few cattle smugglers enter into their farms, slaughter their cows and buffaloes to obtain beef. When they tried to stop them, cattle smugglers open fired on them and ran away.

Full report: ग्रामीणों पर फायरिंग कर मांस तस्कर बाइकें छोड़ भागे

CASE 7:
It was reported in Uttar Pradesh that when policemen signalled a vechile to stop as they were carrying several cows, people inside the vehicle, cattle smugglers, open fired on policemen. In this unfortunate incident, 2 policemen were died and many others were injured.

Full reoort: 2 cops killed in attack by cow smugglers in UP

CASE 8:
3 policemen on checkpoint noticed a vechile loaded with cows, they signalled the vechile to stop. But those cattle smugglers increased the speed of vechile and drove over a policeman. The policeman was shiften to hospital but unfortunately his life couldn’t be saved.

Full report: Police officer crushed to death by cattle smugglers in Jaunpur

CASE 9:
Two cattle smugglers, Hasham and Shaukat were smuggling cows in a truck. But they came in the sight of policemen and when they were being stopped by police, they fired on them. In this incident, a policeman was injured and 21 animals were rescued.

Full report: Policeman injured as cow smugglers open fire at cops in Rajasthan’s Bharatpur

CASE 10:
A BSF Jawan, Tushar Kanti noticed a vechile burdened with cattles coming near checkpoint. BSF Jawan signalled vechile to stop but the smugglers hit the Jawan with vechile and dragged him to nearby shop. Jawan was declared dead in hospital. 5 cattle head were seized from vechile.

Full report: Cattle Smugglers Kill One BSF Guard Along India-Bangladesh Border, As Police Nab Sole Suspect

CASE 11:
Uttar Pradesh policemen were alert as they received information that cattle smugglers might be transporting cattles from Allahabad to Varanasi. When police saw the vechile they attempted to stop it by chasing. But cattle smugglers hit police vechile with their truck and as a consequence, 1 policeman was killed and 5 others were injured.

Full report: Bhadohi: Cattle smugglers hit police vehicle chasing them; cop killed, 6 injured

CASE 12:
Poice personnel from Nuh Police Station were attacked by cattle smugglers in Haryana’s notorious Mewat region leaving two constables injured. They even fired at cops, but were caught after a chase.

Full report: Mewat meat mafia opens fire at Haryana Police, two constables wounded

CASE 13:
It was 12 mid night, when Rambabu, a common villager was sleeping in his home. Suddenly, he heard some voices and woke up. He found that few cattle smugglers are stealing his three cows. He struggled to stop them but was fired by cattle smugglers which got him seriously injured.

Full report: जानवर चोरों ने ग्रामीण को गोली मारी

CASE 14:
Trilok Singh and his relatives were fired by cattle smugglers when they tried to stop them from stealing cows. This incident has taken place in Haryana.

Full report: जानवर चोरों ने ग्रामीण को गोली मारी

CASE 15:
A cattle smuggler, Ehsan, was moving in a truck when police signalled him to stop. But instead, he further increased speed of his vechile and attempted to crush policemen. After a long chase, he was caught but one of his companion succeeded in running away.

Full report: गोवंश तस्करों ने की पुलिस टीम पर ट्रक चढ़ाने की कोशिश, एक गिरफ्तार

AN OBSERVATION:
We have just now studied several cases where cattle smugglers attacked a group of people and security forces. Now just imagine if “reverse” happens. Suppose a group of people which saw cattle smugglers snatching away their cows, attack them. In that case, even without any investigation, Media label that “group of common people” as “Hindutva Mob”, some step even further and label them as “Cow Terrorists”

In fact, those states where we see the act of “cow vigilance” happening more are some of those where act “cow smuggling” occurs more. For example, we all often hear the name of Rajasthan in the cases of “cow vigilance” but the truth which is not told by MSM is that in Rajasthan alone, 1113 cases of cow smuggling were registered in past 3 years.

NOT JUST IN INDIA
As I have said, in India, whenever a group of people attack cattle smugglers, Media turn “the group” into “Hindutva mob” and “cattle smugglers” into “innocent people”. So let’s take few cases from those countries where there is no chance of “BJP/RSS/Hindutva people” being there.

PAKISTAN: It was reported that in Rawalpindi [Pakistan] A suspected thief was beaten to death by villagers when he was caught stealing cattle along with his accomplices in an Attock village on Monday.

Full report: Villagers beat ‘cattle thief’ to death

MADAGASCAR: Madagascan villagers have killed more than 60 cattle thieves in separate attacks in four areas and 98 out of 100 stolen zebu, the local breed of cattle, were recovered.

Full report: More than 60 cattle thieves killed by Madagascar villagers

MALAWI: Angry villagers in Dowa on Friday torched to death a man believed to have come from Area 25 in Lilongwe for being suspected of stealing cows.

Full report: Cattle thief torched to death in Dowa

BANGLADESH: Angry villagers beat four men to death and injured another two on suspicion of cattle rustling in Noakhali.

Full report: Four ‘cattle thieves’ beaten to death in Noakhali

KENYA: Two suspected cattle thieves were yesterday lynched by residents of Nangwe village in Kabuchai.

Obviously, the number of incidents of cow vigilance taken place in India is far greater than any of those countries mentioned above, but then, it is to be considered that the number of cows, number of smugglers and the sensitivity towards cows is also far greater in India.

Acknowledgement:
I’m truly grateful to a Twitter user, @Sanity_3, who made a wonderful long thread of tweets highlighting those cases where cow smugglers attacked common people and security forces. It is because of him, I thought of writing this article.