Saturday, September 21, 2024
Home Blog Page 18

The Manipur violence

Elijah Biji
-
0
The Manipur violence

Unraveling the veil of violence

Manipur, the “A Flower on the Lofty Heights” is currently engulfed in a harrowing wave of violence that erupted on May 3, 2023. Clashes between the Meitei and Kuki tribes have led to tragic consequences, leaving behind a trail of destruction and displacement. Amid confusion and misinformation, it is imperative to uncover the true reasons behind this catastrophic upheaval.

A Tapestry of Communities:
Nestled in the northeastern region of India, Manipur is home to diverse ethnic communities, including the Meitei, Nagas, and Kuki-Chin-Mizo. These communities, each with their own rich cultures and traditions, contribute to the vibrant tapestry of Manipur’s social fabric.

With the Meitei comprising 53% of the population, the remaining 47% is formed by the Nagas and Kuki-Chin-Mizo groups. Despite their coexistence, tensions and grievances have simmered beneath the surface, occasionally manifesting in unfortunate incidents.

Genesis of the violence:

The Trigger: A March Unraveled:

On May 3, 2023, the All Tribal Students’ Union of Manipur (ATSUM) organized a ‘Tribal Solidarity March’ across the ten hill districts. Tragically, violence ensued when a segment of the Anglo-Kuki war memorial gate was set ablaze in Churachandpur. This incident ignited a volatile dispute between the Meitei and tribal communities, eventually spreading from the capital city of Imphal to various districts. The aftermath witnessed a wave of destruction, with over 120 lives lost, 45,000 people displaced, and thousands injured.

Unravelling Complexity:
As the situation spiralled out of control, speculation emerged regarding the true catalyst for the violence. While early assumptions pointed to chauvinistic reactions against the inclusion of Meitei in the Scheduled Tribes list, the underlying reasons appear to be multifaceted. Ethno-tribal tensions, land disputes, and political rivalries have all contributed to the combustible environment in Manipur. To comprehend the true causes, it is crucial to dig deeper beyond surface-level narratives and misinformation that often accompany such crises.

A Call for Unity and Peace:
The people of Manipur are weary of the ongoing violence and yearn for peace and tranquillity. The government’s response, though delayed, has deployed significant resources, including the military, police, and relief efforts. It is imperative for all stakeholders, including political leaders, community representatives, and civil society, to come together and initiate meaningful dialogue and reconciliation. Only through genuine efforts to understand and address the underlying issues can Manipur find a path towards healing, harmony, and a secure future for all its communities.

Causes for the upbreak:

Immediate cause:

In the mystical realm of Manipur, where the vibrant tapestry of cultures and traditions flourished, a consequential event unfolded on the fateful day of April 19, 2023. From the lofty chambers of the High Court, a proclamation resounded, the Meitei community would now find their place in the revered Scheduled Tribes (ST) list.

As this announcement cascaded throughout the state, the tribals were not content with the verdict. A march was organized under the banner of the All Tribal United Front (ALTUF) to resolve the issue, not in an aggressive manner but with peaceful resistance, aimed at opposing and contradicting the High Court’s decision. The tribes apprehended that the inclusion of the Meitei community in the ST list might deteriorate their ancient rights, deplete their limited resources, and blur the vivid hues of their distinct tribal identities.

2. It began with the emergence of two organizations, Arambi Tengol and Meitei Leepun, their intentions veiled in a shroud of aggression and chaos. These organizations unleashed a destructive force upon the peaceful protest of the tribal communities. Fueling their actions with misguided fervour, they sought to suppress the dissenting voices that dared to rise against the inclusion of the Meitei community in the ST list.

The actions of Arambi Tengol and Meitei Leepun reverberated through the valleys and hills, tarnishing the noble cause of the tribal protest. Their aggressive methods overshadowed the peaceful intentions of the ALTUF movement, casting a dark cloud over the hopes and dreams of Manipur.

3. The Kuki community in India has been facing significant challenges and grievances from the government, particularly under the BJP administration. Instead of addressing their concerns, the government has labelled them as “encroachers” and “illegal immigrants,” further exacerbating their marginalization. This labeling not only undermines their identity but also perpetuates a negative perception of the Kukis among the general population.

The Kuki tribals have been deprived of essential resources and opportunities, particularly in the realms of education, employment, and economic development. This systemic neglect has resulted in a widening gap between the Kukis and the rest of society, perpetuating their socioeconomic disadvantage.

Moreover, the government’s policies have targeted Kuki villages located in reserved forests, leading to forced evictions. These evictions have been carried out without proper consultation or consideration for the rights and livelihoods of the Kuki people. Consequently, this heavy-handed approach has fueled dissent and led to protests, some of which have taken a militant form.

Instead of engaging in dialogue and addressing the root causes of the grievances, the government has chosen to suppress the Kuki community, exacerbating tensions and further marginalizing them.

It is crucial for the government to recognize the legitimate concerns of the Kuki tribals, engage in meaningful dialogue, and work towards inclusive policies that address their needs and aspirations. By doing so, the government can foster a sense of belonging and provide opportunities for the Kuki community to thrive, thus contributing to a more equitable and harmonious society.

4. The narrative of stolen weapons, specifically the theft of approximately 3,500 firearms and over 500,000 rounds of ammunition by mobs from government armories in Manipur, is indeed a serious concern with far-reaching implications for security and public safety.

  • Security vulnerabilities: The theft of such a significant number of weapons and ammunition suggests a severe security lapse. It indicates that the armouries where these firearms were stored lacked adequate security measures or were not robustly protected. This could be attributed to a variety of factors, including insufficient resources, outdated infrastructure, lack of proper surveillance systems, or even corruption within the security apparatus.
  • Breach of trust: The theft of weapons from government armouries raises questions about the integrity and reliability of those entrusted with their safeguarding. It suggests a failure in the vetting and training of personnel responsible for the security of these facilities. Additionally, it may highlight potential corruption or collusion within the security forces, allowing unauthorized access to the armouries.
  • Public safety concerns: The large-scale theft of weapons poses a significant threat to public safety. The illicit circulation of such a substantial number of firearms and ammunition increases the risk of armed violence, including organized crime activities, armed robberies, and even acts of terrorism. It endangers the lives and well-being of the general public and law enforcement agencies operating in the region.
  • Impact on law enforcement efforts: The stolen weapons can undermine the effectiveness of law enforcement efforts. Criminals who obtain these firearms can gain an advantage over the police, making it more challenging for authorities to maintain law and order. The increase in illegal firearms in circulation can lead to a rise in armed crimes, further straining the resources and capabilities of law enforcement agencies.
  • Need for improved security measures: The theft highlights the urgent need for enhanced security measures and stricter protocols to safeguard weapons in government armories. This could involve a comprehensive assessment of existing security systems, infrastructure upgrades, implementation of advanced surveillance technologies, and increased personnel training. It is crucial to ensure that armouries meet the highest standards of security to prevent unauthorized access and theft.

Hence, the theft of a large number of weapons and ammunition from government armouries in Manipur reflects a serious security breach and raises concerns about the robustness of security measures in place. It underscores the need for immediate action, including improved security protocols, accountability, and reforms, to prevent such incidents in the future and protect public safety.

Conclusion:
As Manipur battles the flames of violence, it is essential to approach the situation with a discerning eye. By uncovering the intricate threads of the conflict, understanding the historical context, and fostering unity and dialogue, the people of Manipur can rise above this dark chapter and rebuild their state with resilience, inclusivity, and enduring peace.

The facade of secularism

anirbanchoudhury2000
-
0
The facade of secularism

There seems to be no end to the centuries-old trend of denigrating and mocking anything that’s connected even remotely with Sanatan Dharma (aka Hinduism). And the recent hullabaloo over the inauguration of India’s new parliament building by Prime Minister Narendra Modi once again exposed the prevalence of this deep-rooted and disturbing mindset among many.

While the moot point of contention between the ruling coalition and the opposition was over who should have inaugurated the new complex, it soon degenerated into something more sinister as many opposition leaders, prominent citizens and even media were seen clearly regaling at taking potshots at the country’s rich Dharmic traditions.

They mocked Modi for laying prostrate on the ground with his forehead smeared with saffron paste, performing puja, meeting saffron-clad seers from various adheenams of Tamil Nadu and installing the Sengol. They were left fuming that the Prime Minister of a “secular” country had openly displayed the nation’s rich Dharmic tradition, clearly oblivious to the intrinsically non-sectarian nature of these practices.

Though a concept borne out of necessity in the west to separate powers between the church and the monarch, and subsequently imported into this country, “secularism” in India has over the past several decades taken an altogether different contour. As Dharma was inherently non-religious in character since it was about morality, ethics, one’s duties and responsibilities, etc, there really occurred no need for such a concept in this ancient land.

As Vedacharya Dr David Frawley vividly puts it: “Hinduism as Sanatana Dharma always takes a universal view. Does not have any compulsions to conquer or convert the world because universal unity is its foundation. But asks us to remove adharma and ahamkara.”

However, many Indians educated in western values and systems began to be influenced by the concept of secularism and started interpreting it as per their own convenience, before foisting it on the citizens of this great country. A plain reading of the original Preamble to the Constitution of India clearly reveals the non-sectarian/non-religious nature of the polity, yet the words “Socialist Secular” were deliberately inserted subsequently out of a political compulsion to pander to other groups at the cost of the majority community. And, as they say, the rest is history.

The term “secularism” began to be loosely used as a ruse to purge all traces of Dharmic thoughts and traditions from the popular mainstream narratives. Ancient Hindu temples and institutions were taken over by the government, while places of worships and other institutions belonging to other religious groups were allowed to run independently sans any interference. And not just that. India is perhaps the only country where minority religious groups are allowed to run a flourishing multi-billion-dollar conversion industry to covert the majority community.

Also, she is perhaps the sole nation that shies away from openly embracing her ancient lineage, while even Islamic countries like Egypt and Indonesia never desist from flaunting their pre-Islamic heritage. Things have come to such a pass that any conscious display of Hindu tradition is frowned upon, while flaunting minority identity is considered cool.

So, while holding of iftar parties by the country’s political elites, including the powerful government institutions, had become the norm until recently, meting out a similar treatment to the majority community on their festive occasions was a taboo. No wonder, the self-proclaimed secularists in the country are aghast at Modi for breaking this decades-old government convention and flaunting the country’s rich Dharmic traditions before the whole world.

But, they ought to remember that elaborate Christian rituals are conducted during the coronation of a new monarch in the UK or even the new US President takes oath of office by the Bible (not to speak of the incumbent attending a mass prior to the oath-taking ceremony) and that heads of Islamic nations openly invoke Allah every moment.

Leaders of all these countries never shy away from displaying their religious identity. Only India has to remain tethered to a seemingly out-of-the-world concept where majority faith has to be compulsorily under wraps.

Actually, those peddling “secularism” evidently pursued a more hideous agenda of conditioning the mind of the majority community through a combination of creating false narratives, academic misrepresentation of facts, etc. So, while they promoted “Ganga-Jamuna Tahzeeb”, they downplayed the ancient universal Sanatani concept of “Vasudhaiva Kutumbakam” (the world is one family). Their sense of country’s rich historical legacy begins only with Islamic invaders through the British rule, while ancient Bharat to them is just a myth.

Hence, the likes of Qutub Minar and Taj Mahal or even the old Parliament building built by the British are supposed to be the national treasures, but the intricately done Konark Temple or Meenakshi Amman Temple or Kailasa Temple are just some stone relics of a bygone era. Also, any social evil in this country is always conveniently tagged with Hinduism. So, the term “Hindu growth rate” was used liberally by academicians vis-à-vis India’s economy for decades until the 1990s, but a similar expression has never been used to describe the poor state of economy in the Islamic world or the Latin America or Africa.

Superstitions and blind beliefs or even misogyny have been always linked with Sanatan Dharma, while the explicitly patriarchal nature or the unquestionable dogma of the organised belief systems are always above reproach, beyond scientific scrutiny. This partly explains the stiff resistance to Modi Inc’s bid to decolonise the polity and the popular thought process, of which the new parliament building forms an intrinsic part.

Yours truly holds no ill-will against followers of other faiths or questions their beliefs and practices, nor advocates any curbs on them. But, there should be an even-handed approach from the government when it comes to dealing with matters of faith of different communities. The state cannot be seen pandering to one particular group or groups of people at the peril of others purely out of political considerations.

Bottomline is, Sanatan Dharma is fundamentally different from dominant Abrahamic faiths in terms of principles. It is a vast ocean where everything immerses into itself. It is about time to understand its core philosophy and acknowledge its universality, instead of trying to assign it a particular character on the lines of organised faiths.

By Anirban Choudhury

The Hindu bill: Unveiling the controversial intersection of religion, politics, and rights in India

Nachiketh Davuluru
-
0
The Hindu bill: Unveiling the controversial intersection of religion, politics, and rights in India

The Congress Party’s proposed legislation, known as the Hindu Bill, garnered attention before the 2014 Lok Sabha elections in India. This bill aimed to bestow special rights and status upon Hindus and related religions, which constituted the majority of the population.

Rooted in the ideology of Hindutva, which advocates for a Hindu-centric culture and identity in India, the bill faced vehement opposition from the Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP), as well as numerous civil society groups and minority communities. Their concern stemmed from the belief that the bill would contravene the secular and pluralistic principles enshrined in the Indian constitution. Despite generating considerable discourse, the Hindu Bill failed to be passed by parliament, remaining a contentious issue within Indian politics.

The international community also voiced its reservations about the Hindu Bill, with various human rights organizations expressing apprehension about its potential impact on freedom of expression, association, and religion.

The United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights (OHCHR), in a 2013 report, cautioned that the bill could stifle freedom of expression and association, leading to discrimination against religious minorities.

Similarly, Human Rights Watch denounced the bill in a 2013 report, labelling it as a regressive step for religious freedom in India and warning that it could be exploited to target religious minorities and suppress dissent.

The International Commission of Jurists (ICJ), in a 2013 statement, condemned the bill as a clear violation of the right to freedom of religion and belief, highlighting the risk of justifying discrimination against religious minorities. 

The Hindu Bill serves as a prime example of the Congress Party’s failed attempt to grant preferential treatment to Hindus and affiliated religions in India, underpinned by the Hindutva ideology. Its rejection was met with widespread opposition from the BJP, civil society groups, religious minorities, and international human rights organizations, all expressing concerns that the bill would undermine the secular and democratic foundations of the Indian constitution.

Consequently, the bill became a divisive issue in Indian politics, as demonstrated by the violent protests it triggered in Assam in 2013. Many in the region feared that the bill would encourage illegal immigration from Bangladesh, jeopardizing their cultural identity. 

The Hindu Bill exemplifies the intricate and contested nature of religious identity and citizenship in India, a country characterized by its diverse and pluralistic population. The legislation raised pertinent questions about the role of religion in public life, the rights of minority groups, and the challenges of fostering social harmony and national integration.

Moreover, it highlighted the ideological differences between the Congress Party and the BJP, the two major political parties in India, regarding their respective visions for the nation’s future. While the Congress Party argued that the bill aimed to safeguard Hindu culture and heritage against external threats, the BJP accused the Congress Party of pandering to the Hindu majority and disregarding the principle of secularism. 

The Hindu Bill ignited debates and protests within India and abroad, exposing the complexities associated with reconciling religious diversity and national unity in a democratic society. It underscored the necessity for dialogue and consensus among diverse stakeholders to ensure the preservation and observance of India’s constitutional principles.

Scholars and activists, for instance, advocated for an inclusive and human rights-based approach to citizenship, one that upholds the dignity and diversity of all individuals, rather than relying on religious affiliation. 

In light of the upcoming 2024 Lok Sabha elections in India, the Congress Party may once again seek to highlight the issue of the Hindu Bill. If they choose to do so, it could have significant implications for their political campaign. The party may attempt to rally support from Hindu voters by emphasizing their commitment to protecting Hindu culture and heritage, framing the bill as a means of safeguarding their interests.

However, this strategy could also draw criticism from opponents who perceive it as appeasement or a departure from secular values. It remains to be seen how the Congress Party will navigate this contentious issue and the potential impact it may have on the electoral landscape. 

The revenge of Mumtaz: Shah Jahan’s controversial tale

drthirthoojha
-
0
The revenge of Mumtaz: Shah Jahan’s controversial tale

Shah Jahan, the renowned Mughal emperor, is often associated with the Taj Mahal, a symbol of love. However, delving into history reveals a darker side to this story.

This article uncovers the lesser-known events surrounding Shah Jahan’s relationship with Mumtaz, shedding light on a narrative of revenge rather than love.

The Encounter: Shah Jahan and Mumtaz meeting

Shah Jahan first noticed Mumtaz while she was selling spices at a local bazaar with her husband.

His lecherous gaze fixated on her, leading him to visit the bazaar incognito, hiding his true identity.

During a conversation about spices, Shah Jahan shamelessly inquired about the price of Mumtaz herself, referring to her as “lady spices.”

Mumtaz’s husband, recognizing the Mughal ruler’s intent, valiantly defended his wife, delivering a powerful blow that left Shah Jahan severely injured.

Mumtaz’s husband & Family:

Mumtaz and her husband belonged to an Iranian Parsi family.

A week after the incident, when they were leaving the bazaar to return to Persia, Shah Jahan, fearing their departure, orchestrated an attack on Mumtaz’s family.

Tragically, her husband was killed during this assault. At the time, Mumtaz was only 16 years old, with a two-year-old daughter and a five-month-old son.

Shah Jahan’s ruthless actions allowed him to marry Mumtaz, depriving her of the opportunity to perform the last rites for her deceased husband, son, and family.

Mumtaz’s Life after husband’s death:

Following her husband’s death, Mumtaz’s life became a harrowing ordeal.

She contemplated revenge against Shah Jahan or even ending her own life.

Yet, Shah Jahan enslaved her, subjecting her to a miserable existence.

Mumtaz’s desperate attempts at self-harm were thwarted by Hijdaz, whom Shah Jahan appointed to keep a watchful eye on her.

The Clever Brahmin Boy:

In the midst of her suffering, Mumtaz encountered a sympathetic Brahmin boy who had also fallen victim to Shah Jahan’s destruction.

He became her guru, providing guidance on seeking revenge.

Together, they hatched a plan to instill deep-seated resentment and animosity in Mumtaz’s children toward their father.

The Plan Unfolds:

One year after her husband’s death, Mumtaz reluctantly agreed to marry Shah Jahan, all the while instructing her eldest daughter to hold him accountable for his actions, whether she lived or died.

Each year, Shah Jahan forced Mumtaz to bear him another child.

Both mother and daughter collaborated to ensure the children harbored bitterness and animosity towards their father.

Mumtaz’s Legacy:

After giving birth to her 14th child, Aurangzeb, Mumtaz tragically passed away.

Following her death, Shah Jahan shockingly married her own sister just two months later.

Additionally, he compelled Mumtaz’s daughter to marry him, which deeply repulsed both the daughter and Mumtaz’s sister.

The daughter reluctantly agreed to the marriage, intending to exact revenge on her father-turned-husband while caring for her brother, Aurangzeb.

Opinion & Summary

The story presented here is based on the accounts passed down through generations in Agra.

It was shared by an elderly man from the Brahmin family, which was connected to Mumtaz’s quest for revenge.

While many may criticize this version of events, it highlights a different perspective on the famous Taj Mahal, portraying it not as a symbol of love but as one of lust and hatred.

It is crucial to approach historical accounts with an open mind, recognizing that interpretations can vary.

The story of Mumtaz’s revenge, as shared by the descendant of the Brahmin family, sheds light on the complexities and darker aspects of Shah Jahan’s character and his treatment of Mumtaz and her family.

Ultimately, it is up to each individual to explore and reflect upon the history surrounding the Taj Mahal and draw their own conclusions.

While this alternative account challenges the popular romanticized view, it invites us to question

and seek a deeper understanding of the past, acknowledging that historical narratives are often shaped by various influences and motivations.

As we delve into the annals of history, let us approach the stories with curiosity, critical thinking,

and empathy, recognizing that the truth can be elusive and open to interpretation.

Biden administration supports terrorist organization in Bangladesh

Salah Uddin Shoaib Choudhury
-
0
Biden administration supports terrorist organization in Bangladesh

The Biden administration and several lawmakers in the United States Congress are extending support towards Bangladesh Nationalist Party (BNP), despite the fact that it is an undesignated terrorist organization, while the party’s current acting chairman Tarique Rahman is a convicted terrorist.

On August 21, 2004, at the direct instructions of Tarique Rahman, terrorists of BNP along with members of militancy outfits such as Harkat-ul-Jihad (HuJI) had launched grenade attacks targeting Sheikh Hasina and leaders of Awami League. According to the court verdict, this gruesome attack was a well-orchestrated plan through abuse of state power.

And all the accused, including BNP Senior Vice Chairman Tarique Rahman and former top intelligence officials, were found guilty and handed down various punishments for the grenade attacks that killed 24 people and injured scores. In the murder case, Tarique and 18 others were sentenced to life in prison.

Major General Gaganjit Singh, former Deputy Director General of India’s Defense Intelligence Agency (DIA), said BNP acting chairman Tarique Rahman was the mastermind of 10 truck arms haul in Chattogram [Chittagong] in 2004.

Talking to India Today and a television channel in Bangladesh, he said the arms were being supplied under direct patronization of the then BNP-Jamaat alliance to use Bangladesh as a sanctuary.

Ten trucks full of arms seized at Chittagong in April 2004 was meant not only for the United Liberation Front of Asom (ULFA) but also for a few other rebel groups in India’s northeast to destabilize the country, he added. The arms were being supplied by taking advantage of the BNP-Jamaat alliance to use Bangladesh as a sanctuary, Singh revealed.

It may be mentioned here that, BNP tried to turn Bangladesh into a sharia state by spreading cocoons of terror while it has also been actively working in sponsoring cross-border terrorism and international terrorism with the nefarious agenda of spreading seeds of terrorism within Indian states.

According to court documents published by the US Department of Justice (DOJ) dated December 16, 2016, while giving verdict to an asylum petition of a BNP activist, an Immigration Judge in the United States found the petitioner to be credible but concluded that he was ineligible for asylum and withholding of removal due to his inadmissibility under section 212(a)(3)(B)(i)(VI) of the Act, 8 U.S.C. § 1182(a)(3)(B)(i)(VI), as a member of the BNP – which the Immigration Judge deemed to be an undesignated terrorist organization under section 212(a)(3)(B)(vi)(III) of the Act (I.J. at 3-6).2 But for the respondent’s inadmissibility under section 212(a)(3)(B) of the Act, the Immigration Judge would have granted the respondent’s application for asylum under section 208(b) of the Act based on showings of past persecution and a well-founded fear of future persecution in Bangladesh on account of his political opinion (I.J. at 6-9; Exh. 3 at 5; Tr. at 10, 22-40).  

The court verdict further said:

Generally under the Act, a group is designated as a “terrorist organization” either by the Secretary of State pursuant to section 219 of the Act, 8 U.S.C. § 1189, or by publishing the designation in the Federal Register after the Secretary determines, in consultation with the Attorney General or Secretary of Homeland Security, that the group engages in “terrorist activity.” 5 See sections 212(a)(3)(B)(vi)(I), (II) of the Act. However, even if not so designated, a group may qualify as an undesignated “terrorist organization” if it is composed of “a group of two or more individuals, whether organized or not, which engages in, or has a subgroup which engages in [terrorist] activities.” Section 212(a)(3)(B)(vi)(III) of the Act. Nevertheless, even if an alien is a member of an undesignated terrorist organization he or she remains eligible to seek asylum and withholding of removal, if he or she can “demonstrate by clear and convincing evidence that [he or she] did not know, and should not reasonably have known, that the organization was a terrorist organization.” Section 212(a)(3)(B)(i)(VI) of the Act.

Unlike with designated terrorist organizations under sections 212(a)(3)(B)(vi)(I) and (II), a determination regarding a group’s status as an undesignated terrorist organization under section 212(a)(3)(B)(vi)(III) of the Act must be made on a case-by-case basis, in connection with an individual application for immigration benefits. See U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Servs., Dep’t of Homeland Security, Terrorism-Related Inadmissibility Grounds (TRIG), uscis.gov (follow “Laws” hyperlink; and then follow “Terrorism-Related Inadmissibility Grounds” hyperlink); see also Melanie Nezer, The Material Support Problem: Where US. Anti-Terrorism Laws, Refugee Protection, and Foreign Policy Collide, 13 Brown J. World Aff. 177, 179 (2006). For this reason, any determination regarding the BNP’s status as an undesignated terrorist organization under section 212(a)(3)(B)(vi)(III) of the Act is case-specific and must be based on the facts presented in each individual case.

According to the Department of Justice, Tier III terrorist organizations are also called “undesignated terrorist organizations” because they qualify as terrorist organizations based on their activities alone without undergoing a formal designation process like Tier I and Tier II organizations.

Neo-Taliban forces want to capture power in Bangladesh

Bangladesh Nationalist Party from its very birth under military dictator General Ziaur Rahman has been vigorously pushing-forward anti-India, anti-Hindu and pro-Islamist agenda with the aim of turning Bangladesh into another Afghanistan or Pakistan. During BNP’s rule of 2001-2006, supporters of this party were seen openly chanting slogans Aamra Hobo Taliban, Bangla Hobey Afghan (We shall become Taliban, Bangla will turn into Afghanistan) and burning American flags on the streets of Dhaka and other major cities.

Furthermore, BNP had directly sponsored and patronized Islamist militancy outfit Jamaatul Mujahedin Bangladesh (JMB) while it was maintaining direct links with Harkat-ul Jihad (HuJI), Khatmey Nabuwat Movement (an anti-Ahmadia outfit) and were behind terrorist acts targeting religious minorities such as Hindus, Christians, Buddhists, Ahmadis and others. It may be mentioned here that Harkat-ul-Jihad-al-Islami is believed to have been founded as an offshoot of a Pakistani group in 1992 with money and support from suspected global terrorist mastermind Osama bin Laden.

Western intelligence officials believe a certain Fazlul Rahman, who signed bin Laden’s February 23, 1998, declaration of holy war on the US on behalf of the Jihad Movement in Bangladesh, is an associate of the now independent group.

World population day!

Swetha Krishnan
-
0
World population day!

World Population Day was initiated by the United Nations Development Programme way back in 1989. The world population was about 5 Billion at that time. Today it is claimed to be over 8 Billion according to the latest data. World Population Day was observed for this problem of excess population and its effects. It is observed every year on July 11 to create awareness among people about the seriousness of problems we might face due to overpopulation.

Without a doubt, overpopulation is obviously a problem that might bring lots of trouble for every individual living in this world. Each country should and is taking steps toward controlling the population. We as citizens of a country should cooperate with the country and follow the measures they initiate to keep the population in control.

Particularly speaking about India, It is the most populous country in the world, surpassing China in the recent past with over 1.4 Billion people. Our government has strictly taken initiatives like Family Planning & Welfare Programs and much more to control the population to the maximum possible.

We always talk about the cons of overpopulation. Have we ever thought about the positives of having many people residing in our country? Many educational professionals from ThreeBestRated®, a happening website where you can easily pick the best in your locale, also claim the same. It is because the number is not just a count.

It is the number of brains that can contribute to the growth of the country. Increased human capital will help you create many geniuses who contribute to the world with various innovations and inventions. If the government takes steps to use this large amount of human labour to its fullest potential. The country can easily have a jump in their economic growth which will eventually make the country one of the superpowers of the world.

Instead of complaining about the population, Any country should figure out ways to use human intelligence and labour to the fullest and contribute to the sustainability of the world!

Instead of complaining about the population, Any country should figure out ways to use human intelligence and labour to the fullest and contribute to the sustainability of the world!

Analyzing the consequences of ongoing riots in France

Salah Uddin Shoaib Choudhury
-
0
Analyzing the consequences of ongoing riots in France

The ongoing riots in France have captured the attention of the nation and the world, with many speculating about the potential for the situation to escalate into a full-blown civil war. While civil war is a grave concern, it is essential to analyze the factors at play and consider the historical context before drawing any conclusions. In this article, we will assess the likelihood of a civil war erupting in France as a consequence of the ongoing riots.

France, a country renowned for its rich history, cultural heritage, and political activism, is currently witnessing a wave of ongoing riots that have significant implications for the nation and its people. The protests, marked by civil unrest and public discontent, have sparked a series of events that could potentially shape the country’s future in various ways. In this article, we will delve into the consequences of these ongoing riots in France and explore their impact on different aspects of society.

While the ongoing riots in France are characterized by civil unrest and public discontent, it is important to note that they primarily stem from specific social, economic, and political grievances. These protests are not based on deep-seated ethno-religious or regional divisions typically associated with civil wars. The unrest is driven by demands for socioeconomic justice, equal opportunities, and political accountability rather than a desire for secession or the establishment of separate political entities.

Civil wars typically involve armed factions representing different groups or regions, each with distinct political or ethnic motivations. In the case of the ongoing riots in France, there is no presence of armed factions advocating for the breakup of the country or engaging in large-scale armed conflict. The protests have been predominantly characterized by non-violent demonstrations, clashes with law enforcement, and sporadic instances of vandalism. Thus, the absence of organized armed groups reduces the likelihood of a civil war.

But according to some analysts, as the unrest is continuing for several months, it is not unlikely that a segment of the population may ultimately form armed groups, while it may start getting weapons and explosives mostly from the anti-West bloc thus pushing the existing situation into a full-blown civil war. In this case, revolting French populace and the organized crime groups may start getting weapons and explosives from the underworld network, which currently is receiving substantial supplies from the Ukrainian war fronts.

Rejecting the possibility of a civil war, some of the analysts said, France’s position as a member of the European Union and its engagement in various international collaborations further reduces the likelihood of a civil war. The country’s integration into the European framework promotes peaceful resolution of conflicts, economic stability, and the rule of law. Additionally, the international community, including neighboring countries and international organizations, would likely play a mediating role in mitigating the risk of a civil war, encouraging peaceful dialogue, and supporting political solutions.

It may be mentioned here that the ongoing riots in France are often fueled by political and social grievances. They serve as a reflection of public frustration with government policies, economic inequalities, and social injustice. As the protests intensify, they contribute to an atmosphere of political instability, challenging the authority of the government and raising questions about its ability to address the concerns of its citizens. This political unrest could lead to a loss of public trust in the government, potential changes in leadership, or even calls for a complete overhaul of the political system.

Riots and civil unrest can have a profound impact on a country’s economy. France, being one of the largest economies in Europe, is not immune to these consequences. The ongoing riots can disrupt business operations, impede foreign investments, and adversely affect tourism. The destruction of public infrastructure and private property can result in significant financial losses for individuals, businesses, and the government. Furthermore, the uncertainty caused by these protests may deter investors, leading to economic stagnation and a decline in overall productivity.

Riots often highlight existing social divisions within a society. In the case of France, the ongoing protests have shed light on issues such as income inequality, racial discrimination, and the marginalization of certain communities. These protests amplify the voices of marginalized groups, drawing attention to their grievances.

However, they can also exacerbate social tensions and deepen divisions, as different segments of society hold varying perspectives on the causes and solutions to the unrest. Fostering dialogue, understanding, and inclusivity will be crucial to addressing these divisions and working towards a more cohesive society.

Riots and civil unrest create security challenges for both the government and the general public. As the protests escalate, they can lead to clashes between law enforcement agencies and demonstrators, resulting in injuries, property damage, and even loss of life.

Maintaining public order becomes a significant challenge for law enforcement, requiring careful management to prevent escalation and maintain the safety of all citizens. The strain on security forces can also divert resources from other important areas, potentially impacting the overall safety and security of the country.

While riots can be disruptive and destructive, they can also serve as a catalyst for change. Ongoing protests in France have already sparked discussions on policy reforms, political accountability, and social justice. These events can push the government to address the underlying causes of public dissatisfaction, leading to the implementation of new policies and reforms aimed at addressing the concerns of the people.

It is essential for the government to listen to the demands of the protesters, engage in dialogue, and work towards meaningful and sustainable solutions to the issues raised.

Some analysts said, the French government possesses strong state authority and institutions capable of maintaining order and security. Despite the challenges posed by the ongoing riots, the government has shown resilience in responding to public discontent.

The state’s ability to enforce the rule of law, control protests, and manage security concerns significantly reduces the probability of the situation escalating into a civil war. The government’s focus on addressing the root causes of the protests through dialogue and policy reforms also contributes to stability.

It further said, France has a history of political activism, protests, and social movements. The country has witnessed significant civil unrest in the past, but it has not resulted in a full-fledged civil war. Previous instances, such as the May 1968 protests, demonstrate that while public discontent can be intense, it is ultimately channeled into democratic processes, reforms, and negotiations. France’s democratic traditions, coupled with its commitment to political dialogue, provide a framework for resolving conflicts without resorting to armed conflict.

While the ongoing riots in France have raised concerns about the potential for a civil war, a careful analysis of the dynamics at play suggests that such an outcome is unlikely. The protests primarily revolve around specific grievances rather than deep-rooted divisions. The absence of armed factions, the state’s authority and capacity, historical context, and international influence collectively contribute to the maintenance of stability and the likelihood of a peaceful resolution.

However, it is crucial for the government and the citizens to engage in dialogue, address concerns, and work towards equitable solutions to prevent further escalation and ensure a prosperous and harmonious future for France.

In my opinion, the ongoing riots in France have far-reaching consequences that impact various aspects of society. They raise questions about political stability, economic prosperity, social divisions, and security concerns. While riots can disrupt daily life and cause significant damage, they also provide an opportunity for reflection, reform, and progress. It is crucial for the government, civil society, and citizens to engage in constructive dialogue, prioritize peaceful means of protest, and work together towards addressing the root causes of public discontent.

Only through collective efforts can France emerge stronger and more united from this period of unrest. Most importantly, this ongoing protest shall have a negative impact on President Emmanuel Macron when he faces the next presidential election as his political rivals can portray him as a dictator and even as a fascist.

At the same time, France is currently witnessing economic decline because of COVID pandemic and the participation of France in the Ukraine war with military hardware and cash. Things may turn further difficult for President Macron if there is no immediate solution to the Ukraine war or if Russia succeeds in further intensifying its assault on Ukraine taking advantage of Kiev’s shortage of weapons, ammunition and advanced military hardware.

2024 elections: Can Congress party make a comeback?

adityashajwani
-
0
2024 elections: Can Congress party make a comeback?

The country is eagerly anticipating the upcoming 2024 elections, where the world’s largest democracy will go to the polls. Political parties have already begun their full-fledged campaigns, with the ruling BJP aiming to retain a significant majority. However, the unpredictable nature of politics means it won’t be an easy task, as they will face strong opposition unity.

In the upcoming articles, I will analyse the major political parties leading up to the 2024 election. Let’s start with the Indian National Congress (INC), the oldest political party in India. Established in 1885, the INC has held power at the centre for almost 70 years. However, in recent years, it has experienced a decline in influence, particularly since 2014. Under Rahul Gandhi’s leadership, the party suffered defeats in the 2014 and 2019 elections, securing only 44 and 52 seats, respectively.

The INC is a centre-left party that emphasises secular principles and aims to appease minority communities. While it held the position of the main opposition party to the BJP for the past decade, it has lost ground to regional parties. Nevertheless, its recent victory in the 2023 Karnataka polls has boosted morale among its members.

The party has attempted to rejuvenate itself and present Rahul Gandhi as the primary challenger to Narendra Modi, but these efforts have largely been unsuccessful. Their recent Yatra (political journey) ended up causing division rather than unity, involving individuals with extreme views and affiliations, which undermined their goal. Rahul Gandhi’s interviews often had negative consequences, damaging his credibility.

Another noteworthy development within the party was the appointment of Kharge as President, defeating Shashi Tharoor and gaining the support of the Gandhi family. This made Kharge the prominent Dalit leader after Bapu Jagjivanram in the early 70s. On the other hand, Rahul Gandhi was disqualified from contesting the election due to derogatory remarks made against PM Modi and members of the OBC Modi community.

Regarding recent election performances, the INC secured victories in Himachal Pradesh and Karnataka in 2023, directly competing against the BJP. It also holds power in Rajasthan, where it will have to compete again in the upcoming election. However, there is currently a visible divide between young leader Pilot and loyalist Ghelot. The party will also participate in the upcoming Madhya Pradesh elections, which it won in 2018 but lost due to defections by Scindia and his supporters to the BJP. The INC still remains in power in Chhattisgarh.

A noteworthy observation is that despite the INC’s victories in Chhattisgarh, Madhya Pradesh, and Rajasthan in 2018, they faced a significant setback in the 2019 elections, with the BJP securing 303 seats. This indicates that voting patterns differ between state and national elections. For instance, in the 2023 Karnataka polls, the INC focused on local issues and emerged victorious.

In 2019 The INC also holds power in Jharkhand through a coalition with the corrupt Jharkhand Mukti Morcha. In Maharashtra, although the Maha Vikas Agadi an alliance of INC, NCP and Sir Sena under Uddhav Thackeray formed a government it was brought down as this alliance was weakened by defections from the Shiv Sena members, resulting in Shinde assuming power with Fadnavis as the deputy CM. The problem with the INC is their lack of a clear future plan beyond defeating the BJP, even if it means adopting an anti-national stance.

This is evident in their demand for proof of surgical strikes in Pakistan and their opposition to the abrogation of Article 370. Additionally, the party attempts to project a soft Hindutva image while simultaneously targeting and insulting Hindus, failing to recognise the prevailing right-wing wave in the country. To achieve success, the INC needs to address national issues rather than engage in controversies and self-deprecation.

The triumph in Karnataka can be likened to the 1978 elections, where Indira Gandhi made a significant political comeback after the emergency period. Similarly, it can be compared to the late 90s when Sonia Gandhi initiated her political career by winning from Bellary. I’m interested to hear your thoughts on this and your predictions for the performance of the Congress party. Please share your views on it as well.

Unmasking western politicians: Cash-for-influence deals with a convicted terrorist leader

Salah Uddin Shoaib Choudhury
-
0
Unmasking western politicians: Cash-for-influence deals with a convicted terrorist leader

A large number of politicians in the United States, United Kingdom and the European Union are selling their influence in exchange for influence and favors to an undesignated terrorist organization in Bangladesh and its leader, who is a convicted terrorist as well involved in cross-border terrorism. For years, Bangladesh Nationalist Party (BNP) and its ideological ally Jamaat-e-Islami (JeI) have been spending millions of dollars in influencing lawmakers in the Western countries, in which, recently the BNP has appointed Hunter Biden as its lobbyist with the assignment of using Biden administration’s influence in unseating the ruling secularist government of Awami League and helping BNP in returning to power.

Acting chairman of BNP, Tarique Rahman is a convicted terrorist as well he also is convicted in another case of cross-border terrorist act for his direct involvement of funding and patronizing insurgency groups inside India.

Major General Gaganjit Singh, former Deputy Director General of India’s Defense Intelligence Agency (DIA), said BNP acting chairman Tarique Rahman was the mastermind of 10 truck arms haul in Chattogram [Chittagong] in 2004.

Talking to India Today and a television channel in Bangladesh, he said the arms were being supplied under direct patronization of the then BNP-Jamaat alliance to use Bangladesh as a sanctuary.

Ten trucks full of arms seized at Chittagong in April 2004 were meant not only for the United Liberation Front of Asom (ULFA) but also for a few other rebel groups in India’s northeast to destabilize the country, he added. The arms were being supplied by taking advantage of the BNP-Jamaat alliance to use Bangladesh as a sanctuary, Singh revealed.

It may be mentioned here that, on August 21, 2004, at the direct instructions of Tarique Rahman, terrorists of BNP along with members of militancy outfits such as Harkat-ul-Jihad (HuJI) had launched grenade attacks targeting Sheikh Hasina and leaders of Awami League. According to the court verdict, this gruesome attack was a well-orchestrated plan through abuse of state power.

And all the accused, including BNP Senior Vice Chairman (now acting chairman) Tarique Rahman and former top intelligence officials, were found guilty and handed down various punishments for the grenade attacks that killed 24 people and injured scores. In the murder case, Tarique Rahman and 18 others were sentenced to life in prison.

According to court documents published by the US Department of Justice (DOJ) dated December 16, 2016, while giving verdict to an asylum petition of a BNP activist, an Immigration Judge in the United States found the petitioner to be credible but concluded that he was ineligible for asylum and withholding of removal due to his inadmissibility under section 212(a)(3)(B)(i)(VI) of the Act, 8 U.S.C. § 1182(a)(3)(B)(i)(VI), as a member of the BNP – which the Immigration Judge deemed to be an undesignated terrorist organization under section 212(a)(3)(B)(vi)(III) of the Act (I.J. at 3-6).2 But for the respondent’s inadmissibility under section 212(a)(3)(B) of the Act, the Immigration Judge would have granted the respondent’s application for asylum under section 208(b) of the Act based on showings of past persecution and a well-founded fear of future persecution in Bangladesh on account of his political opinion (I.J. at 6-9; Exh. 3 at 5; Tr. at 10, 22-40).

According to the Department of Justice, Tier III terrorist organizations are also called “undesignated terrorist organizations” because they qualify as terrorist organizations based on their activities alone without undergoing a formal designation process like Tier I and Tier II organizations.

Terrorist agenda of Bangladesh Nationalist Party

Bangladesh Nationalist Party from its very birth under military dictator General Ziaur Rahman has been vigorously pushing-forward anti-India, anti-Hindu and pro-Islamist agenda with the aim of turning Bangladesh into another Afghanistan or Pakistan. During BNP’s rule of 2001-2006, supporters of this party were seen openly chanting slogans Aamra Hobo Taliban, Bangla Hobey Afghan (We shall become Taliban, Bangla will turn into Afghanistan) and burning American flags on the streets of Dhaka and other major cities.

Furthermore, BNP had directly sponsored and patronized Islamist militancy outfit Jamaatul Mujahedin Bangladesh (JMB) while it was maintaining direct links with Harkat-ul Jihad (HuJI), Khatmey Nabuwat Movement (an anti-Ahmadia outfit) and were behind terrorist acts targeting religious minorities such as Hindus, Christians, Buddhists, Ahmadis and others.

It may be mentioned here that Harkat-ul-Jihad-al-Islami is believed to have been founded as an offshoot of a Pakistani group in 1992 with money and support from suspected global terrorist mastermind Osama bin Laden. United Nations Security Council has termed Harkat-ul-Jihad-al-Islam as a “violent extremist group operating throughout South Asia, which has carried out numerous terrorist attacks in India and Pakistan”.

It further said, “HUJI’s relationship with Al-Qaida developed after the Taliban’s rise in Afghanistan, and included its members training in Al-Qaida camps. By 2005, Mohammad Ilyas Kashmiri (deceased), a HUJI leader, coordinated activities with the Taliban and Al-Qaida from Waziristan. Kashmiri issued a statement in October 2009 (after he had been reported as deceased) that he was alive and working with Al-Qaida. By 2010, a significant number of HUJI operatives were involved in terrorist operations in the Federally Administered Tribal Areas of Pakistan”.

Western intelligence officials believe a certain Fazlul Rahman, who signed bin Laden’s February 23, 1998, declaration of holy war on the US on behalf of the Jihad Movement in Bangladesh, is an associate of the now independent group.

For years, terrorist groups such as Harkat-ul-Jihad-al-Islam (HuJI), Jamaatul Mujahedin Bangladesh (JMB), Ansar Al Islam, Hizbut Tahrir and others have been receiving patronization from Bangladesh Nationalist Party (BNP), while has also been extending patronization and funding to several separatist and terrorist groups inside India, including United Liberation Front of Assom (ULFA), Hizbul Mujahideen etcetera.

Bangladesh Nationalist Party has also been maintaining deeper ties with Hefazat-e- Islam (HeI), a Quranic madrasa-based organization that demands transforming a secularist Bangladesh into a caliphate. Under direct patronization of BNP, in 2013 HeI pressed its 13-point demand through a massive rally in Dhaka, which was attended by hundreds and thousands of madrassa teachers and students. The 13-points of the pro-caliphate Islamist group includes:

  1. Restore the phrase “Complete faith and trust in the Almighty Allah” in the constitution,

2. Pass a law in parliament keeping a provision of the capital punishment of death sentence to prevent defaming Islam,

3. Taking measures for stringent punishment of self-declared atheists and bloggers, and anti-Islamists who made derogatory remarks against Prophet Muhammad. Also taking steps to stop the spread of “propaganda”,

4. Stopping infiltration of all “alien-culture”, including “shamelessness” in the name of individual’s freedom of expression, anti-social activities, adultery, free mixing of males and females and candle-lighting. Women must be encouraged to wear hijab and their overall security must be ensured. Stopping harassment of women, open fornication and adultery, sexual harassment, all forms of violence against women and an end to the tradition of dowry,

5. Make Islamic education mandatory from primary to higher secondary levels canceling the women policy and anti-religion education policy,

6. Officially declare Ahmadiyyas as non-Muslim,

7. Stopping erection of sculptures at intersections, schools, colleges and universities across the country,

8. Lifting restrictions on prayers for ulema [read radical Islamic militants] in all mosques across the country, including Baitul Mukarram National Mosque,

9. Stopping Anti-Islamic content in media,

10. Halt to anti-Islam activities by NGOs across the country, including in the Chittagong Hill Tracts; Hefazat fears a “foreign conspiracy” to separate Chittagong Hill Tracts from Bangladesh and make it a Christian state,

11. Stop attacks and extrajudicial killing of ulema [read radical Islamic militants],

12. Stopping harassment of teachers and students of Qawmi [Koranic] madrassas and ulema,

13. Freedom for all arrested ulema and madrassa students and withdrawal of all cases filed against them, compensation for the victims, and bringing the assailants to justice. The above 13-points pressed by Hefazat-e-Islam resembles that of Afghan Taliban and members of radical Islamic militancy outfits such as Al Qaeda and Islamic State (ISIS).

Western policymakers and security agencies are not unaware of this disturbing fact of connection between the Bangladesh Nationalist Party and Islamist-jihadist outfits in Bangladesh. They also are not unaware of BNP being an undesignated terrorist organization or its leader Tarique Rahman being a convicted terrorist who also is linked to cross-border terrorist acts.

Still a section of the western lawmakers are unhesitant in accepting lobbyist assignments from BNP and help this party in returning to power thus turning Bangladesh into a neo-Taliban state.

Why is it becoming Modi vs USA?

Dr Jadabeswar Bhattacharjee
-
0
Why is it becoming Modi vs USA?

Hinduism has all along been looked down upon in the West as an inferior religion, if a religion at all, because of the West’s One Book Syndrome. The fact that followers of Hinduism were not people of book, but people of library was beyond the comprehension of the West.

In other way, the tinge of Christian prejudice and colonial mentality had combined effect on Western scholars to downplay Hinduism vis-à-vis Christianity. Hindu-majority India was thus looked at by the West with contempt.

The subtle but consorted anti-India background game played in the USA during PM Modi’s state visit in June 2023 was an extension of that Western mentality towards India. India’s association with USSR/Russia also irritated the USA against India. Though the CIA could destroy Communist USSR in December 1991, but the Communist ideology penetrated academia, think tanks, Congress and policy making groups of the USA with great success in the past three decades.

In the recent past, Communists, Islamists and African Americans of the USA have developed a new anarchic ideology called “Wokeism”. The present ruling party of the USA, that is the Democrat, is a Wokeism-centric party. Whereas the other one, that is the Republican, is an Evangelical party. India was never in the good book of either. But with the growth of Wokeism in the USA, the situation has worsened for India. The policy influencers of the USA accept Indian-Americans as their asset, but consider the people living in India as inferior, crude, uneducated and uncouth.

In the tense days of the Cold War, the Republican Nixon-Kissinger duo initiated the alliance of the USA with the Communist China. President Nixon even visited China in 1972 which was secretly facilitated by Pakistan. Nixon wanted to put pressure on the Communist USSR by posturing closer to the Communist China. With the fall of the USSR, China’s importance became less before the USA.

After that, the USA developed a weird policy in favour of China. The Chinese cheap labour-cost prompted the USA to transfer its manufacturing units and technologies to China. That helped China to develop fast in economic, military and scientific sectors. The citizens of the USA were fed by their government with the lie that with economic development, China would switch over to Democracy. This pro-China policy of the USA was in top gear upto the time of President Obama, who literally made a Frankenstein out of China for the USA.

With the developing compulsion of geopolitics, the USA now needs India in Asia as a partner to counter China and as a big market too. India also needs the USA for defence manufacturing support and transfer of technology. But the USA is finding it difficult to deal with Modi, who is incorruptible and nationalist to the core.

The USA now wants India minus Modi. They have successfully created a cabal of Islamists, Communists, Secularists and Congress sympathizers in India. But so far Modi has been found to be too strong for the cabal. The Soros-Gate of $ 600 million to oust Modi, the recent anti-India venom-filled USA visit of Rahul Gandhi, Obama’s agenda-driven statement on Indian minority (Muslims) and the question of White House journalist Sabrina Siddiqui to Modi centring Indian Muslims are only the arm-twisting tactics of the USA for Modi.

It is high time that India should hit back strongly at the biased news of persecution of Indian Muslims under BJP rule. This Islamist-Leftist-Congress propaganda at national and international levels has been tolerated for too long with silence by the Modi government. The plight of Hindus in neighbouring Pakistan and Bangladesh since 1947 needs to be highlighted. The gross discrimination of non-Muslims in Muslim countries requires to be pointed out. The deliberate amnesia of Muslim and Western countries towards persecution of Uyghur Muslims of China reflects the hypocrisy of Islamist-Western gang.

Professor of Jawaharlal University, Delhi, Dr Anand Ranganathan has rightly observed, “Since 2017, there have been more than 200 documented instances of hate crime attacks, lynchings and attempted lynchings by Muslim mobs on Hindus, Dalits and non-Dalits. But, none of these instances elicit a response or outrage from the cottage industry of activists and journalists (in India and abroad) who only highlight incidents where the Muslims are the victims (in India)”.

Hindus in Pakistan and Bangladesh cannot imagine of committing such crime against Muslims there under any situation. Indian Muslims cry for the plight of Muslims of Palestine. They are also violently eager to settle Rohingya Muslims in India. But Indian Hindus have never raised the burning issue of continuous persecution of Hindus in Pakistan and Bangladesh. So, there is an urgent need to tell people about the other side of the story.

Modi is standing like the Rock of Gibraltar between the anti-Hindu propaganda, dominance of the USA over India and India’s national interest and self-respect. The USA will try to make anybody (Rahul Gandhi or Mamata Banerjee or M K Stalin or Kejriwal or even Nitish Kumar) the PM of India in place of Modi. The general election of 2024 in India will be a defining moment for India, as well as, Modi. All the nationalist Indians must pull up their socks now or never.

About the author: Dr Jadabeswar Bhattacharjee served Government of India and retired as Higher Administrative Grade Officer after 35 years of service. After retirement from the service, he developed interest in writing on contentious issues and topics. His published books are (1) Politically incorrect Point of View, (2) Politics, Bong and Faith, (3) The Alternative Narrative, (4) The West Bengal Saga and (5) Political Islam and India.

1...171819...890Page 18 of 890

Contact: [email protected]

About us

User generated chapter of OpIndia. Selected articles submitted here are published at main English or Hindi websites of OpIndia.

ऑपइंडिया

OpIndia

© OpIndia.com