Home Blog Page 127

भारत ने चीन पर फिर की डिजिटल स्ट्राइक, भारत मे बैन किये 54 ऐप्प

0

भारत सरकार ने एक बार फिर चीन पर डिजिटल स्ट्राइक की है। सूत्रों के अनुसार, भारत की सुरक्षा के लिए खतरा पैदा करने वाले 54 चीनी ऐप्स पर भारत सरकार प्रतिबंध लगाएगी। एएनआइ के अनुसार, इन 54 चीनी ऐप्स में ब्यूटी कैमरा: स्वीट सेल्फी एचडी, ब्यूटी कैमरा: सेल्फी कैमरा, ईक्वलाइजर एंड बेस बूस्टर, कैमकार्ड फॉर सेल्सफोर्स एंट, इसोलैंड 2: एशेज ऑफ टाइम लाइट, वीवा वीडियो एडिटर, टेनसेन्ट एक्सराइवर, ऐप लॉक और डुअल स्पेस लाइट शामिल हैं।

Free Fire भी है लिस्ट में :
बता दें कि Garena Free Fire भी पिछले दो दिनों से Google Play Store और Apple App Store से गयाब है, अंदाजा लगाया जा रहा है कि इसे भी बैन किए गए ऐप्स की लिस्ट में होने के कारण रिमूव किया गया है, हालांकि, इस बात की फिलहाल ठोस जानकारी नहीं है इस संबंध में न तो गरीना इंटरनेशनल की ओर से न ही Apple या Google की ओर से कोई जानकारी दी गई है।

गौरतलब है कि सरकार ने साल 2020 में कई चीनी ऐप्स को बैन किया था, जिसमें PUBG Mobile, PUBG Mobile Lite और TikTok शामिल थे. हालांकि, PUBG Mobile भारत में अब BGMI के नाम से चल रहा है।

इससे पहले पिछले साल जून में भारत ने देश की संप्रभुता और सुरक्षा के खतरे को ध्यान में रखते हुए व्यापक रूप से उपयोग किए जाने वाले सोशल मीडिया प्लेटफार्म जैसे टिकटाक, वीचैट और हेलो सहित 59 चीनी मोबाइल एप्लिकेशन पर प्रतिबंध लगा दिया था। 29 जून के आदेश में प्रतिबंधित अधिकांश ऐप्स को लेकर खुफिया एजेंसियों ने चिंता जाहिर करते हुए कहा था कि, उपयोगकर्ता डेटा एकत्र कर रहे हैं और संभवतः उन्हें बाहर भी भेज रहे हैं।

हिजाब की आड़ में भारत को उर्दूस्तान बनाने की साजिश

0

हिजाब को लेकर विवाद दिनोदिन बढ़ता जा रहा है हिजाब की मांग करने वाली मुस्लिम महिलाओं को इस्लाम मे पढ़ने स्कूल जाने की इजाजत नहीं फिर हिजाब को लेकर विवाद क्यों?

स्कूल में पढ़ने के लिए अगर हर समुदाय हर वर्ग अलग परिधान की मांग करें तो वो धार्मिक मजहबी संस्थान में परिवर्तित हो कर रह जाएगा। कांग्रेस की प्रियंका वाड्रा का स्कूल को लेकर एक विवादित ट्वीट भी देश मे अराजकता का एक कारण बन सकता है। प्रियंका ने ट्वीट कर लिखा बिकनी, घूंघट, जीन्स जिसे जो मन वो पहन सकता है तो हिजाब क्यों नही? प्रियंका वाड्रा ये बताए कि किस स्कूल या शिक्षा संस्थान में बिकनी पहन कर कोई विद्यार्थी गया हो?

हिजाब की आड़ में देश मे अराजकता फैलाने की साजिश बड़े स्तर पर की जा रही है जिसे लेकर IB ने अर्लट जारी किया है। हिजाब की आड़ में देश को तोड़ने की खालिस्तानी साजिश रची जा रही है। भारतीय मुसलमानों को दंगा करने के लिए भड़काया जा रहा है जिसका असर कई राज्यों में प्रदर्शन के जरिये देखा जा सकता है।

देश संविधान के अनुसार चलेगा किसी की चॉइस से नही क्योंकि भारत एक लोकतांत्रिक देश है देश मे मौजूदा स्थिति को देखते हुए यूनिफॉर्म सिविल कोड का होना अतिआवश्यक हो गया है यदि जल्द से जल्द पूरे देश मे यूनिफॉर्म सिविल कोड लागू कर दिया जाता है तो बहुत सी साजिशों से भारत को बांटने की कोशिश नाकाम हो जाएगी।

Hijab rights is like Gandhi and his Goat: Read how and why

0

The present protests for Hijab Rights erupting with a well co-ordinated plan to disrupt the nation’s sovereignty reminds me about the story of Gandhi and his Goat. It was said that Gandhi loved Goat milk and so he started rearing a Goat. It was well fed, groomed with lux soap and virtually was one of the richest Goats in the care of an alleged poorman costing the State about ₹ 10/- in those days. It might not seem much in today’s terms but it was indeed a lot. What has Gandhi and his Goat got to do with the on-going protests, one might ask?

The fact that everyone remembers the story of Gandhi and his Goat but not the costs it took to maintain it, just shows how carefully crafted stories romanticized by bootlicking friendly media tend to gloss over a lot of important details to make an ordinary self serving individual into a Mahatma. Some might get offended but truth I believe is the best defence. There is a lot at stake for this country to fall to the romanticized crap that is being dished out in the name of secularism.

The simple fact that a student is saying Hijab is more important than education is a cause for alarm. The fact that the kid has been brainwashed into believing that knowledge is not important but some arcane rule about covering up is, it is the time we stand up and say enough. There is no question about a person’s right to follow their religious beliefs. But there is also no question of imposing their religious belief on an institution filled with diverse religious beliefs following a strict uniform code for its students. And the students choosing to defy the rules of the institution in the name of religious customs or beliefs are actually ready to harm not only their careers but others as well. The colleges and schools are closed. The students, who should be in classrooms are now on the streets trying to uphold their own religious identity. Where does the buck stop?

The reason I started with Gandhi and his Goat is because, like in those days, we are being misled into looking at something un-important while being hoodwinked and looted from the back. Remember that all those, who are fanning these protests under the garb of religious freedom want our youth to hate each other by dividing us.  That is their real agenda. A young mind brainwashed into believing that the other side is harmful grows into hating the other side. Let’s not let today’s young kids grow up to be tomorrow’s revenge seekers.

That is what the world wants to see. The world wants to see the destruction of a proud culture that has been living in harmony for centuries together without losing their individual identities yet retaining a respect for varied cultural and religious diversities. It has been tried and tested method for all those who came to enslave, subdue and rule over us. They couldn’t break the spirit of our ancestors, who in the end succeeded in throwing out our oppressors by posing a united front. It is time again to realize that knowledge can’t be suppressed behind a veil and that true power comes from knowledge.

Uniform is a necessary element of educational institutions and there are no bargains for it. It promotes a sense of equality and brotherhood between young minds. Let us not make those minds into narrow minded closeted individuals growing up to look at others with fear and hatred from behind their veils. The other reason I oppose the Hijab or the Burqa in an educational institution so strongly and vehemently, is the reason given by Islamists in propagating their Law and I am just giving my understanding here and not strict paraphrasing, “Any girl who does not wear a hijab is bound to be looked at by evil eyes.” Firstly,  you are promoting objectification of a woman over, what definitely should be their choice to wear. It’s like giving a choice without any option. And secondly, you are painting men or young boys as animals in a jungle than living human beings in a society of laws.

If young minds are subject to such regressive thoughts, they will grow up to become bigoted and hateful individuals posing harm to the society and women’s safety too. Let us teach our kids universal principles of brotherhood and the way to live in harmony with diversity.  One doesn’t need to flaunt their Yagnopavita on their chest nor draw a veil over their face to follow their individual faiths, especially in educational institutions. Respecting other religions doesn’t mean flaunting your religion in their face. So, when there are elements that are disrupting and corrupting young minds into giving up knowledge then it is time for society and government to step in and act.

We need to nip this in the bud as it is the future of our youngsters at stake. I respect a Muslim woman’s right to wear a Hijab, Burkha or any other choice of dress she feels comfortable in their own personal space and public space. But they cannot be a part of institutions, like the schools or colleges. They follow certain uniform dress code and the students do not have the choice of expressing their religious freedom in such institutions.  Period. Any unnecessary deviation is only going to give others to exploit these individuals immaturity to do a lot more harm in the country. There will definitely be escalation in the intensity of the violence. We have already seen students being beaten up by some Muslims in the guise of religious freedom. They are trying to instigate more such riots and we are all falling into the watch and do nothing Mode just like we watched Gandhi’s Goat and never once questioned, how the hell is the Goat so fat and healthy, while the country was starving?

To conclude, the nation paid for overlooking many IMPORTANT TRUTHS to believe in the romanticized version of a Man painted as the Mahatma and it took us many years to peel the layers behind the romanticism. Let us not be the mis-guided fools awestruck at the beauty of the Goat and start educating our young generation about the importance of uniform and respect for educational institutions and its custodians, the teachers. Because if they don’t respect the rules of a school and fight not for their education but their religious beliefs and stoop to heckling their own teachers, can they grow up to respect the constitution or the rule of law? They need to understand the consequences of breaking rules and following prey to malicious and sinister agenda. I don’t suggest any corporal punishment or any other sinister ideas but these are young minds, who need to be taught in clear terms about respecting institutional norms and following them.

And I sincerely hope the Judiciary will take the right decision in showing the value of following uniform dress code through their judgement. The country is on a path of reforms and achievements and today’s young minds are going to be the torchbearers for tomorrow’s future. We have to be pro-active in educating these young minds about the importance of seeking the truth by gaining complete knowledge than let them be influenced by half-baked knowledge spewing from the mouths of those seeking to destroy the country from within. Tomorrow’s future cannot be bargained at the alter of indecision or standing still.

Even before I started this article I had to do my own research on the hijab or burqa and also talked to some Muslim friends I have but never seen in a Burqa to understand the gravity of this custom. If it’s a choice, the educational institution picks the choice of what to wear be it a boy or girl. They are free to roam in the clothing of their choice outside. And from what I have learnt and assimilated from my friends and research, Burqa is a choice and not compulsory as per their own custom and beliefs. So the rule of the institution prevails and it is time these students are made to understand that. Jai hind.

It’s time left-liberals and feminists stopped supporting Islamists

Have you ever observed the extremely unusual bonhomie among Left-liberals, feminists, and Islamists? If you haven’t noticed it, you can safely assume that you are neck-deep in practicing political correctness. Because political correctness never allows you to see beyond the smokescreen it creates.

Couldn’t understand what I’m trying to say? Read on…

Left-liberals, Islamists, and feminists are indeed strange bedfellows. Left-liberals claim that they are secular, liberal, democratic, and progressive. Feminists claim they fight for the empowerment of women. Now, take a look at Islamists. Among Islamists there are two types: those who blatantly advocate Islamization of society and the other are closet Islamists. The closet Islamists hold an equally strong desire for rapid Islamization of society through Sharia, but resist themselves from manifesting their pro-Sharia tendencies openly. Instead, they hide behind ideals such as the constitution, democracy, and human rights. Therefore, Islamists and closet Islamists are one and the same and they want Sharia to be implemented all over the world.

Now, when people come together in a political arena, they must have some ideological affinity… right? But despite my best efforts, I’m not able to comprehend what these three groups have in common. Liberals advocate secular and progressive values, feminists advocate empowerment of women, and the behavior of Islamists reflects completely opposite ideas – bigotry, violence, expansionism, and regressive tendencies. They are also opposed to women’s empowerment.

Islamism, as everyone knows, is spreading like wildfire all over the world, mostly through violent ways. The incidents happening in Afghanistan, Pakistan, Bangladesh and many countries in the Middle East are the best examples of this phenomenon.

Now, how come left-liberals and feminists have joined forces with Islamists, who do not subscribe to any ideas they advocate? The leftists, who cry from rooftops about Hindutva, fail to explain the methods used by their darling, China, while dealing with Uyghur separatists. Therefore, the real motive behind the Left-Islamist alliance needs deeper investigation. This Left-Islamist alliance is not limited to India and is prevalent all over the world.

The left-liberals and feminists are mostly found in newspaper offices and university campuses. This is where they keep coining new terms such as ‘Brahminical Patriarchy’ to denounce and stigmatize Hindus. However, they either completely ignore or even support Islamist excesses.

We are facing an interesting situation all over the world in liberal circles. If a Muslim asserts his identity and advocates Sharia, he/she is applauded in the name of pluralism. But if a Hindu asserts his religious identity, he/she is instantly branded as a Hindutva bigot. If Hindu women wear ‘Ghunghat’, it is denounced as a regressive symbol of patriarchy. But when Muslim girls want to enter schools wearing burqas (most of the pro-hijab protesters are actually seen in burqas), all the liberals, including feminists, applaud their ‘bravery’ and advocate their right to wear the garment by terming it as a ‘choice’.

The liberals don’t lose any chance to support the Islamists. They supported them during Shaheen Bagh protests during which roads were blocked for months and ended up in violence; they supported Muslims praying in public places; and they even opposed the Triple Talaq bill that is intended to do justice to Muslim women. In a way they just play second fiddle to Islamic clergy and oppose any move to bring about reforms in Islam. At the same time, they don’t leave any opportunity to intervene in Hindu religious affairs in the name of reforms. The entry of women into Sabarimala temple is one of the best examples of this phenomena. As a Hindu, I do support women’s right to enter any temple irrespective of customs, and no temple should restrict entry to any individuals based on caste and gender. But at the same time, can the liberals and the feminists advocate the same in the case of Muslim women? Can they get them entry into Mosques?

Now, take the example of the hijab row that escalated very rapidly in the country. At a time when women in many parts of the world are rebelling against the imposition of burqa/hijab, the radical Islamist organizations are provoking Muslim girls to violate uniform dress code and enter classrooms wearing hijab. This is clearly an attempt to Islamize society and create chaos in India. And, as usual, left-liberals and feminists in India started supporting Islamists by advocating the hijab. Now the entire controversy has come down to whether hijab/burqa is an essential religious practice in Islam.

The lawyers went to the extent of reading out the Quranic verses in courtrooms to defend the right of Muslim girls to don Islamic attire in classrooms. This is truly ominous. Do they want to run the country based on the essential religious practices of a religion? Does that mean we are well on our way to a Sharia-compliant society?

Recently, I started reading Quran out of curiosity. And, I was dumbstruck after reading many of the verses. For example, read the below verse which prescribes wife beating.

Virtuous women are obedient and guard in the husband’s absence what God would have them guard. As for those from whom you apprehend infidelity, admonish them, then refuse to share their beds, and finally hit them. (Quran: 4:34)

Now, imagine a situation where a Muslim woman, who is a victim of domestic violence, knocks at the door of a law court and the lawyer reads out from Quran to justify wife-beating. Will the Lordships listen to such submissions?

Take another example…

When the forbidden months have passed, kill the polytheists wherever you find them. Take them captive, and besiege them, and lie in wait for them at every place of ambush. (Quran: 9:5)

Now, imagine a situation where the polytheistic Hindus die in a terror attack, and the lawyers in a courtroom read out Quranic verses to justify the killing of polytheistic Hindus; will the lordships listen to such submissions?

If India is a secular country, let it stay secular. No personal laws must be permitted, and our country should be run as per a uniform civil code.

When Muslims don’t want asylum to be granted for the persecuted minorities from neighbouring Islamic theocracies, they block roads and run riot, and liberals and feminists support them.

When Muslim girls want to enter classrooms wearing hijabs, disregarding the uniform dress code, liberals and feminists support them.

When a bill was passed in parliament making Triple Talaq illegal, liberals and feminists opposed it.

When Muslims pray in public places, causing inconvenience to others, liberals and feminists support them.

When Islamic militants carry out terror attacks, the left-liberals indirectly support them by calling them activists, workers, and gunmen.

We haven’t yet forgotten the fact that liberals supported the Leftist mob who eulogized the terrorist, Afzal Guru, by raising slogans that include “Afzal hum sharminda hai, tere qatil jinda hai”. While doing so, they even ignored the fact that Afzal Guru attacked the Parliament building, the temple of democracy.

We haven’t even forgotten how some so-called journalists tried to humanize terrorists by employing terms that include ‘headmaster’s son’, ‘maths teacher’, ‘austere religious scholar’, ‘family man’, and what not. And, the New York Times, the darling of the left-liberals, even refused to recognize the fact that terrorists had attacked the WTC towers. Instead, it blamed inanimate airplanes for “taking aim and bringing down the World Trade Center”.

And the left-liberals want to go to any extent to support Islamist radicals. In the process, they want to consign their reason and rationality to ashes. Their constant and continuous support for Islamists makes it amply clear that they are bereft of any ethics or objectivity.

So how long will they keep supporting the Islamists? How deep will they sink while defending the indefensible?

Will they support wife beaters, killers of polytheists, and Jihadists even while claiming to be liberals? Have the so-called feminists sacrificed the cause of women’s empowerment at the altar of Sharia just to appease the Islamists? Haven’t they already touched the nadir?

These are the questions that need answers. If the left-liberals and the so-called feminists keep moving down the same path, there will be a day when no one will take them seriously and they will not have even an iota of credibility left.

Hijab drama well played: A perfectly chosen timing just ahead of UP elections

0

Of the 965 students – 90 Muslims and of which 6 students of the Government college in Udupi chose to skip classes than attending it with proper code mentioned. These six students weren’t attending classes since 31st December 2021. Three weeks ago they preferred to come back to college but with the Hijab which they consider is their fundamental right.

Their videos and pictures stating they were denied fundamental right to education because they chose to attend classes with hijab started spreading and the likes of Swara Bhaskar immediately came in support of them. The matter started gaining attention with more students joining the protest across various educational institutions. But unlike other sites of protests, the Hindu students of Udupi chose not to wait for administration but to give the pills the way they thought fit. Some students who were maintaining the decorum of the college and following the code of conduct also started wearing saffron shawls to the college. Matter started gaining more momentum.

As if this was not enough, a reputed newspaper covered the story of so called “heckling” of a student of minority and piece loving community by a Hindu boy. They went on to put the photograph on important place in the Newspaper – was this responsible reporting? a question still remains unanswered.  However in my opinion they failed to show photograph of the other part of the story where she was safely taken inside college and on other side of the protest where a Hindu boy was in fact harassed by a group of minority students.

The protest soon spread like Omicron variant to other cities like Kolkata, Hyderabad, Mumbai and Karnataka Bhavan and the first love of protesters the Shaheen Bhag site in Delhi. Their reaction and comments reminds us of the subject knowledge which many film celebrities exhibited during anti-CAA protests. These protesters had no knowledge of why they were protesting. All comments zeroed down to Modi, Yogi and Shah. Except for getting covered in black and white headlines and showcasing their unity before elections these protests proved nothing.

The protest also started gaining attention from the not so-cool neighboring countries who if had spent the time they spend in interfering in Indian matters in gaining some more foreign aid would have been proved boon for them.

Inspired by Talibani Victory in Afghanistan, Girls’ Islamic Organisation (GIO) allegedly forced Hindu girls to wear Hijab in Nagpur (India) on World Hijab day on 4th Sept, 2021.

This was the headline of various digital media who were right. Interesting is to note that even on the day they celebrate so as World Hijab Day these students didn’t insist for it. The timing of the protest they chose, not so surprisingly, is just when seven states are going into assembly elections including Uttar Pradesh.

Modi 2.0 is all about protests for the extremists which are left. The anti CAA protest started around 4 December 2019 and the capital was scheduled to go for polls on 8 February 2020. The farmers’ protest started around 9 August 2020 and the election state then was Bihar with poll dates announced as 28 October 2020.

The UP election result will be declared after counting on 10th march 2022. Delhi election which went the AAP way with good majority wouldn’t have been possible but for the anarchism spread in the capital and the free bijli paani incentive. Bihar election still went the NDA way. It would be interesting to see which domain the extremists prick upon and to what extent and intensity they stoop low to when Gujarat goes into election phase.

How was Sheikh Hasina’s life in Delhi for six and a quarter years?

0

Bangladesh gained independence from Pakistan in 1971 through the Great War of Liberation. Father of the Nation Bangabandhu Sheikh Mujibur Rahman took over as the Prime Minister of independent Bangladesh. He later became the President of the country in 1975. But less than four years after the country’s independence, on the morning of 15 August 1975, a group of members of the Bangladesh Army staged a military coup and killed Sheikh Mujibur Rahman and his family at his Dhanmondi 32 residence.

However, two members of Sheikh Mujib’s family, his two daughters Sheikh Hasina and Sheikh Rehana, survived the brutal killing. On that day, written in red letters in the history of Bangladesh, Sheikh Hasina and her younger sister Sheikh Rehana were in Brussels, Belgium, at the residence of Ambassador Sanaul Haque. Sheikh Hasina was accompanied by her husband Wazed Mia and two children, Sajib Wazed Joy and Saima Wazed Putul.

News of the assassination of Bangabandhu and his family reached the family of the current Prime Minister of Bangladesh Sheikh Hasina from Bonn, the capital of West Germany. Humayun Rashid Chowdhury called Sanaul Haque’s house and told him the sad news. Later, Sheikh Hasina moved from Brussels to the residence of Ambassador Chowdhury in the forest. From there, they were reassured by the BBC, Voice of America and other radio stations about the latest developments in Bangladesh.

Sheikh Hasina with father Sheikh Mujibur Rahman; Image Source: Bangladesh Awami League

Ambassador Humayun Rashid Chowdhury started secret activities from 16th August 1975; whether the two surviving daughters of Bangabandhu could be given political asylum in any country. When the matter was brought to the notice of the higher authorities of Delhi, they took the matter very seriously, and two days later they said that preparations should be made to send Sheikh Hasina and Sheikh Rehana to Delhi soon. Indian officials further said that the whole matter should be done very secretly and expeditiously, and that Sheikh Hasina should be sent directly to Delhi on an Air India plane.

Thus Sheikh Hasina left Frankfurt for Delhi on the afternoon of 24 August, and arrived in Delhi very early on 25 August. This was the beginning of Sheikh Hasina’s life of four and a half years in Delhi.

Accommodation

Sheikh Hasina was first kept in a ‘safe house’ at 56 Ring Road. They were later evacuated to a house in the Defence Colony, where they were given three suggestions. First, they should not go out of the house; Second, they should not reveal their true identities to anyone there; Third, do not keep in touch with anyone in Delhi.

Decades later, on September 4, an Indian government official took Sheikh Hasina to Indira Gandhi’s official residence, 1 Safdarjung Road. Ten more days later, they were taken to a flat in the C block of Pandara Park. The flat had three bedrooms and some furniture. A black-and-white television set is also provided to watch the news. At that time, Doordarshan was broadcast on Indian television for only two hours. However, no telephone connection was given to their house at that time.

They spent their days in a tight security zone . There was a strict security cordon around the house. Indian security officials feared Sheikh Hasina’s safety. So the security forces as well as the detectives were watching there.

Sheikh Hasina in front of Sheikh Rehana’s house in London (1970); Image Source: Prothom Alo 

Wazed Mia’s job

Sheikh Hasina’s husband Wazed Mia was working as a nuclear scientist in West Germany. He did not sit idly by even during his exile in India after the assassination of Bangabandhu. He took a job at the Atomic Energy Commission of New Delhi and continued working there till 1982.

The child’s education

Sheikh Hasina’s son Sajeeb Wazed Joy went to several boarding schools in India. These included Kodaikanal International School in Palani Hills, Tamil Nadu and St. Joseph’s College, Nainital. He studied computer science at the University of Bangalore, and later transferred to the University of Texas at Arlington, USA.

Relationship with Pranab Mukherjee

When Sheikh Hasina first arrived in Delhi, Prime Minister Indira Gandhi told Pranab Mukherjee, “You are their guardian in Delhi from now on.” In fact, Pranab Mukherjee was the real guardian of Sheikh Hasina.

Pranab Mukherjee considered Sheikh Hasina as his eldest daughter. Hasina’s son Joy had a good relationship with her son Abhijit and Pranab Mukherjee’s daughter Sharmistha had a good relationship with Sheikh Rehana.

Pranab Mukherjee considered Sheikh Hasina his eldest daughter; Image Source: Focus Bangla

Meanwhile, Pranab Mukherjee’s wife Shuvra Mukherjee also developed a close relationship with Sheikh Hasina. Sheikh Hasina used to call her ‘Boudi’. The relationship was so cordial that when Shuvra Mukherjee died in 2015, Sheikh Hasina left for Delhi without heeding the protocol.

Pranab Mukherjee came to Bangladesh in 2013 as his first foreign trip after becoming the President of India. Sheikh Hasina respected him so much that she wanted to cook and feed him with her own hands. 

Communication with ordinary people

Sheikh Hasina has not been able to come close to many ordinary people in six and a quarter years of Delhi bus. The main reason behind this was his safety. So it was not possible for her to meet too many people except a handful of journalists, politicians and bureaucrats.

One of the lucky ones to meet her at that time was DK Basu, a well-known face in the Delhi football circle and president of the Hindustan Football Club. He visited Sheikh Hasina’s house in Pandara Park more than once.

According to Basu, one of the academics of Dhaka University was behind his first visit to Sheikh Hasina’s house. On that day, he discussed with Sheikh Hasina about the situation in Bangladesh at that time and Bengali literature. Sheikh Hasina is a big fan of Rabindranath Tagore’s poetry. So he gifted Sheikh Hasina innumerable books written by Bengali writers. Basu was impressed by Sheikh Hasina’s sincere, humble manner. 

Delhi’s Park Street Road is now Bangabandhu Sheikh Mujib Road; Image Source: DW / Rajib Chakraborty

Involvement in politics

Surprising but true, Sheikh Hasina was away from politics most of the time on the Delhi bus. Probably a factor as to why they’re doing so poorly in India. Therefore, no matter how deplorable the political situation of her country was, Sheikh Hasina could not take part in any visible political activity despite the wishes of the Government of India.

However, senior Awami League leaders regularly visited Sheikh Hasina’s house and tried to persuade her to take over the leadership of the Awami League. Especially in 1989, the Awami League leaders repeatedly tried to bring Sheikh Hasina back to Bangladesh so that she could help them in the election campaign. But due to the then President of Bangladesh Ziaur Rahman, none of the remaining members of Sheikh Mujib’s family could enter Bangladesh. Even then, in 1981, in the absence of Sheikh Hasina, he was unanimously elected President of the Bangladesh Awami League.

It is worth mentioning that in those days in Delhi, eminent journalist AL Khatib used to work as an assistant to Sheikh Hasina. He is the ‘Who killed Mujib?’ The author of the book, which is considered to be one of the most important documents related to the murder of Sheikh Mujibur Rahman and his family.

Mental state

In the four and a half years she spent in Delhi, Sheikh Hasina was very upset mentally. It was very difficult for Sheikh Hasina to accept what happened to the lion’s share of her family on 15 August 1975. The memory of that day was haunting him like a horror.

Even the slightest mention of August 15 was a big trigger for Sheikh Hasina. Therefore, her husband Wazed Mia used to request all those who came to see her not to raise any issue regarding August 15 in front of her.

May 16 is Sheikh Hasina’s Homecoming Day; Image Source: Jugantor

Last word

The special significance of Sheikh Hasina’s four-and-a-half years in Delhi is that she has used that time to harden her mind and prepare to return to the country to take the helm of the Awami League.

We will never have a chance to know what Sheikh Hasina would have done if she had been able to return to Bangladesh after losing almost all of her family in 1975, and what the post-75 history of Bangladesh would have been like.

However, it can be said that on May 16, 1971, she returned to his homeland Bangladesh as a mentally strong, determined person, and later took the helm of Bangladesh.

Why is the standard of teaching in Bangladesh declining?

0

From the time of Socrates in ancient Greece to the present day 2022, many professions have sprung up in the world, and many professions have been lost in the womb of time. But a profession still holds its place of honor fairly. That is the teaching profession.

Of course this respect is also relative; Different in different parts of the world. In countries like China, South Korea, Taiwan and Malaysia, the social status of teachers is much higher. According to a study by the National Institute of Economic and Social Research, a UK-based think tank, 61 percent of students in China think teachers need to be respected. And as a result of such mentality of the students, the teachers of that country are also occupying more honorable seats than any other professional. However, there are many countries in the world where teachers are not given even the slightest respect. That is why only 36 percent of students around the world have the mentality of respect for teachers .

Sad but true, Bangladesh is also one of the countries in the world where teachers do not get equal respect for their profession. That is why there is a saying in our society:

“When the father of the girl cannot find a groom for his daughter, he is helpless and tries his best to find a master (teacher) as the groom.”

Teachers in Bangladesh are deprived of due respect; Image Source: The Daily Star

In a society where the general public’s attitude towards teachers is such, it is hard to say how much respect and esteem is given to teaching today. However, in addition to respecting teachers, the issue of their quality should also be mentioned at the same time, otherwise the full picture of teaching as a profession in Bangladesh is not revealed.

A recent report by the World Bank states: There is huge educational inequality in the schools of Bangladesh. Thirty- five percent of third- graders cannot read Bengali properly. What is the main reason behind this? According to the World Bank, this is due to the low quality of the teaching profession.

So let’s find out the reasons for the low quality of teaching profession in Bangladesh. The main reason is that the most meritorious students in this country do not usually come to teaching. Especially in primary, secondary and higher secondary level teaching.

The goal of most of the meritorious students of this country is to become a BCS cadre. Education is one of the 26 cadre services in that BCS. But this education is never the first choice of the students. At the top of their list of choices are administration, foreign affairs, taxes, etc. The position of education is in the very last row. It may be mentioned that in the 40th BCS, 4 lakh 12 thousand applications were received against 1903 posts. But less than 1 percent of them applied for general education as a first choice position.

But there are many more posts in the education cadre. Even then the gifted students put it at the end. If there is no other job at all, then they choose secondary and primary school teaching. Simply put, teaching is their ‘back up’ job, not the main job. They feel that their merits in this profession are not properly evaluated. 

For that reason, the teaching profession is a temporary job for many of them. At least sixty percent of non-cadre primary school headmasters later quit their jobs. Why not? This is the position of a second class government official, again in many cases the salary is one grade below! They are forced to quit their jobs due to lack of proper social status and other facilities. Choose a profession with comparatively higher social status and economic benefits.

The salaries of assistant teachers are not very ahamari; Image Source: Kalerkantho

This is only about the head teachers of primary schools. In the case of assistant teachers at this level, the educational qualification is not the most important at all, because their salary is not very important! Male candidates must have a minimum second class from a recognized university, and female candidates must have a minimum second class in the Higher Secondary or equivalent examination. On the other hand, in the case of secondary, a bachelor’s degree (or equivalent degree) in a related subject from a recognized university or institute has to be passed, although more than one third class (class or equivalent CGPA / GPA) is not acceptable in the academic life.

Since the highest meritorious people of the country do not come to the primary and secondary level, but to be a teacher at these levels requires less educational qualification than many other professions, it also affects the meaning of their teaching.

According to a 2016 report from the Implementation Monitoring and Evaluation Department (IMED) of the Ministry of Planning, 80 per cent of students think that they need to read to the teacher personally in order to understand the creative question properly. In other words, more than half of the students think that what the teachers teach in the classroom is not enough. Also, according to another report by the Department of Secondary and Higher Secondary Education, fifty percent of teachers cannot create creative question papers. 

At the university level, a few public-private universities are relatively good. Although political affiliation, kinship and financial dealings are considered as the main qualifications for becoming a university teacher, many meritorious students join here as teachers. But it cannot be said loudly that the tenure of teaching in the local universities of all of them is also long.

The quality of teaching in a few universities is relatively good; Image Source: Daily Sun.

Many meritorious students join the university as teachers, but later tend to go abroad for PhD or higher education and never return. Also, before becoming teachers, many of the best students who have just graduated have gone abroad for post-graduation and never returned. As a result, even those most meritorious students are no longer available as teachers in local universities.

But why do they go abroad and never return? Why is domestic talent being trafficked abroad? When it comes to finding answers to these two questions, it comes down to the issue of respect and dignity of teachers. If they are engaged in the same profession while living abroad, they will get more than the social status and economic benefits that they will get by teaching in a local university. Isn’t it a little exaggerated to expect that today they will return to the country and start teaching by simply dismissing everything else as ‘great profession’?

Thus, analyzing the general picture of teaching from primary level to university level in the context of Bangladesh, it can be seen that the most meritorious teachers in this country work in universities, followed by colleges, secondary schools and primary schools. In other words, the merit of teachers is also declining in parallel with the level. At the same time, the social status , salary and other benefits of teachers are also declining.

But what is the ideal image? For example, we can talk about Finland. The country has one of the best education systems in the world. The most talented students who have completed higher education come to the teaching profession there. And they have to take a course before they can become teachers. Those who do best in that course, get the opportunity in primary, then in secondary, finally in university. And needless to say, the status and salary of teachers are being determined in the same way.

The best teachers needed in elementary education; Image Source: History of Bangladesh

This means that the best teachers in the standard education system will be at the primary level. At the same time they will be the people with the best human qualities and moral values. Because if education is the backbone of a nation, then teachers are the makers of that backbone, and they have to start building that spine and keeping it straight from the very beginning. After the parents, the teachers become the role models or the heroes of the dreams of the tender-hearted children; It is through them that children become acquainted with the outside world, and their talents continue to evolve. The foundation of a child’s intellect and thinking is laid even at that age. Therefore, to ensure that the foundation is the strongest and strongest, it is advisable to have the most talented teachers at the initial stage

Then gradually the position of the next step teachers will be at the secondary and higher secondary level. And a university level teacher will be the most knowledgeable on a particular subject. Although it is not important for him to be in control of all the subjects like the primary level teachers, there is no problem. 

But since the picture of our country’s education system is completely different, it can also be said that our country’s education system is moving in the opposite direction!

As a result of walking in this opposite direction, in the developed world where the quality, honor and dignity of teaching as a profession is skyrocketing, everything in our country is declining. Besides, many teachers are losing their human qualities and moral values ​​as a result of lack of persecution, social stigma and professional inferiority. Instead of emphasizing the importance of classroom teaching, they are leaning towards private or coaching business.

Teachers are leaning towards coaching trade for various reasons; Image Source: Jugantor

At present, teachers are being given various trainings in an effort to enhance their professional standards and skills, but no one seems to be paying much attention to the mistakes that are being made at the very beginning of the education system. As a result, there is not the slightest hint of an immediate change in the neglected state of the teaching profession.

But it is time for all of us to turn our attention to this aspect. The issue of quality education is at number four in the United Nations Global Development Framework 2030 or Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs), and it is clearly stated that the prerequisite for quality education is to enhance the quality of teachers. Undoubtedly, in order to increase the quality of teachers, the issue of their social dignity and economic dignity must be considered with equal importance, otherwise it will never be possible to achieve the desired goal.

Hijab row- An orchestrated one

0

Certainly, clothes say something about us to others. The kind of clothes a person wears for a marriage differ from the ones worn for office. Similarly, informal clothes are worn at home. By seeing in gorgeous clothes, anyone would ask you, whether you are going to any party or some special function. Hence, there are norms set for wearing clothes, although informally. Among the clothes that we wear to a marriage, office or other places, we have a freedom of choice i.e. to choose the color combination, size and length. But not in a uniform. The prefix ‘uni-‘indicates ‘one’.

When a group of people wear the same kind of clothes, we call it uniform. Each school has a set of uniform with a specific choice of color, length, width and shape (skirt/tunic etc.) as indicators. Not only schoolchildren but also nurses in hospitals, soldiers/army men that fight for the country, doctors’ white coat, and lawyers’ black coat are all uniforms indicating their professional identity. A patients in bed, in a hospital would call a nurse by seeing her white dress. Because it is identifiable. Can a nurse be in a hijab? No. Many Muslim women, who work, come to the office with a hijab, in the conservative Old City of Hyderabad. Yet, they remove within office and keep it folded in a shelf. Again while going home after the office, they are re-worn. They never wear hijab or head scarf throughout the day.

Karnataka state schools imposed uniform in their Pre-University Courses (PUC) – schools recently. These Educational Institutions are entitled to do so. The students in PUC are in their late-teens. The girl Muskan Khan shown in the video that she be allowed into the school with her hijab, is not a small child. For her hijab is her identity, not the uniform worn inside. The priority is given to the religious identity, not the secular (worldly) identity given by the schools. Primarily, in schools, imposition of uniform is meant for erasing identities like: rich and poor, caste and creed. In the young and impressionable minds, these kind of disparities would hamper studies. They would also bring in individual differences. India is not a theocratic state and at the same time not too secular to iron out all religious marks and identities.

The liberal arguments—‘don’t people wear goonghat (veil over the face) and don’t people wear tilak’? — are rather pointless. It is only in very few pockets of India these practices are persistent. By and large, these practices are rare. In India, Hindus have no rigid dos and don’ts. Of course, many elite Muslim women do not wear hijab. And many Islamic scholars are saying that it is not an intrinsic part of Islam. The rebel-girl Muskan Khan too, it is said, used to wear jeans and top earlier. She has now switched over to hijab. So do many Muslim girls in that particular school in Karnataka. The talk goes that the Popular Front of India (PFI), an extremist Islamic Organization, is radicalizing these girls.

The opposition parties took a stand that these girls be allowed with the ‘hijab’, so that they could get education, which otherwise their parents would not allow. However, the rebellious girls are with voice loud and clear to fight the school’s mandate, don’t they have the equal or louder voice to argue with their parents for their education? This strike— this intransigence on wearing hijab, is orchestrated by the hard line elements in the religion than the genuine desire of the girls. Even if it is genuine, it is an archaic practice, certainly not suitable to the school-level students. To counter- hijab, wearing saffron shawls is only a reactionary one rather than a solution-oriented plan. The video that went viral on social media, teasing the girl is more defeatist.

The Karnataka High Court’s February 10 interim order to restrain students from wearing hijab or any religious attire till the matter is pending with the court has been challenged in the Supreme Court but the apex court deferred till its completion in the High Court. Anyway, the Karnataka High Court’s interim order to continue with the uniform of school till the final order may fall on deaf ears. One should wait and see what the Supreme Court does finally, when it appears there. The S.C., states it would take up the matter at an appropriate time, the apex court emphasized that these issues should not “spread” at the “national level”. This hijab issue opens-up the Pandora-box of secularism in India. Liberals standing up for the Muslim women’s rights of freedom and  the others to have equal counter-rights to them to sport their religious symbols, ends nowhere. The pertinent thing in the whole hijab-row indicates whether to respect the personal laws of minorities, even though they go against secular- laws or to scrap them and face their alienation.

There are G.Os in all state government of offices that give permissions to the Muslim-minorities on all Fridays to leave office at 12.30 to 2.00 pm for prayers (which the Hindus do not have on any day of the week) and on the whole month of Ramzan, they could leave office by 4.30. These were all given with humanitarian consideration. Hypothetically, if special right to wear ‘hijab’ in the classrooms from the school level is granted, if the Indian Constitution is interpreted thus by the legal experts, it would be a strange situation. After seventy-five years of Independence, if the minorities do not join stream, when are they is the question.

Mental Health is not a Trend

0

Be it getting a new hairstyle and then deeming it a “mental breakdown”, or just saying “I’m so depressed”, that is now something uncommon to hear, overlooking the sheer magnitude of the problem, students of today’s world sometimes think it is alright to post pictures of themselves on social media with captions stating they are depressed, or down with a mental illness, all in lieu of following, what has now transformed, from a serious issue of concern, to a social media trend.

Diseases like PSTD and ASPD, are glamorized beyond margin socially, in literature and in sitcoms and movies, creating a normalization of mental illnesses. Teenagers think it is “cool” to have a mental illness, and on certain occasions, also end up portraying it on their social media pages, to show the world that they have endured a hard life.

The #depressed has over 12 million Instagram posts connected with it. Amongst pictures of people with actual illnesses, and organizations working to spread awareness though, you will find pictures of girls with tattoos, smoking and cartoonized images saying “I want to go away…. forever.” These posts on “beautiful suffering, not only end up trivializing the issue, but end up making it seem quite mundane, resulting the people who actually need help, not receiving it.

On many occasions, we see Youtubers and Influencers posting pictures on social media, sometimes even advertising, but subtly, maybe even unknowingly, glamorising mental illness to impressionable audience, portraying it similar to a fashion trend, making people “want” to obtain it.

People end up labelling their short-term sadness, as depression and their nervousness as anxiety, when the problems faced by those individuals, aren’t connected to mental health issues, and psychological problems whatsoever.

Due to the stigma associated with mental illness, a lack of awareness, the trend we have made it, and limited access to professional help, only 10-12% of the 200 million sufferers seek help. Half of all mental health disorders show first signs before a person turns 14 years old, and three quarters of mental health disorders begin before age 24.

When you have 72% of 13-17-year olds and 75% of 18-24-year olds using Instagram, with 35% rating it as their favourite app, glamorizing mental health can go so far as to trivializing and normalizing the issue. Unfortunately, less than 20% of children and adolescents with diagnosable mental health problems receive the treatment they need. So next time, before you go ahead and glamorize it, think about those who don’t get the help they require. 

Social media has increasingly blurred the line between what is authentic and what is performance. It has made people trivialize and glamorize something that can actually prove to be fatal. Next time you feel like posting a picture of yourself when you are sad or upset, or just for fun even, think. Sadness is one thing. Depression is another.

Educational politics – How schools dehumanize politicians

0

I was attending my school classes, as always. We had a break between our English and Politics class, and I utilized it to its full potential. Personally, I am thoroughly fascinated by politics, politicians and governance in general. I couldn’t wait for our teacher to begin the first chapter. I had prepared in advance, and since we were discussing global politics and analyzing certain decisions, I knew I had an edge over the others. This is where those courses would aid me. Those tiring quizzes I had prepared for. This is where it would repay me. I was exhilarated.

However, after what happened next, that very exhilaration, that very excitement and my passion and fascination for politics, or that chapter at least, went down the drain. We started off by talking about Pakistan under Pervez Musharraf and whether it could be considered a democracy. We then moved on to the Communist rule of China, the unfair rule Mexico faced in the past and after skimming through the above aspects of democracy, decided to end with Robert Mugabe’s rule of Zimbabwe.

The textbook talked about his power-thirsty attitude, his unmoral activities, his corruption and his disgraceful attitude in general. The textbook quite authentically, described his actions in detail and made all of us students aware about the “tyranny” Zimbabwe had to go through under the rule of Zanu-PF.

One aspect of Mugabe’s rule, that was stressed on repeatedly, was that he gave very little or no freedom to opportunity to opposition party workers. It was mentioned in grave detail, that he declared public protests illegal, introduced laws that limited the right to criticize him and thoroughly censored the media and press. The publishers of the textbook even went on to specify how Mugabe had even harassed some journalists who didn’t follow his law.

Now, one might wonder as to what Zimbabwean politics, that too something that happened four or five years ago, or even more is even relevant at this day and age. However, before that is cleared up, I want to ensure you, that this article is not written with any bias in mind. It is solely written for the purpose of conveying what is happening at school and at certain institutions and why it should be changed. I do not bear any affiliation with Zanu-PF, I don’t support or condemn his actions. I am completely neutral in this sphere and I understand that each ruler has his/her own style and method of governance.

But getting back to the point, after completing its rant about Robert Mugabe, the textbook publishers decided to go out on a limb and attack the current government. On the left-hand side of the main content, where there are usually small text boxes with interesting facts or riddles, there was a picture of a girl coming down a slide, who seemed to be having a lot of fun.

Below this seemingly harmless image was something very hurtful. Something that turned the nice political discussion we were having about Zanu-PF, into an exasperating reign of terror. The text, directly relating to Mugabe’s rule, read, and I quote, “Why talk about Zimbabwe? I read similar reports from many parts of our own country. Why don’t we discuss that?”

Our teacher, whom I used to admire a lot, adhered to the question and decided to brief us about her thoughts on politics. I agree that everyone is entitled to their own opinions however, in a class with 180 students, each with different interests, different needs, different likings, it is morally wrong to bring up your own political bias and preach.

Because our school is made up of people from various religious, political, social and economic backgrounds, I feel that teachers should be very careful, especially politics teachers, who play a role of utmost importance in shaping tomorrow’s leaders and tomorrow’s voters. However, this particular teacher was indeed relentless and remorseless in her attack against certain politicians, certain political parties and the Indian political system overall.

She started her lengthy speech by something she came across on WhatsApp, a medium that people label as, “not so trustworthy”. She asked us whether we believed that punishing citizens for criticizing the government, insulting the Prime Minister and other derogatory acts was right or wrong.

A plethora of responses came up and the most common one seemed to be that the government has no right to punish citizens as we have the right to freedom of speech and expression. Our teacher agreed and went on to talk about why we should criticize the government. I was totally fine with this until she started bringing the specifics into play.

She started harassing the current government in power saying we should question them thoroughly and not be “blind”. Now I am aware that people have their own opinions but again, as I have specified, it is blatantly wrong to teach the class what she “feels” is right. It was absolutely unacceptable.

She went on to label these elected representatives as “slaves” and “servants” and continued referring to them as maids and people who work under us, which created a bit of controversy amongst the students. The chat bot was abuzz with numerous messages being sent in, students in awe of what the teacher had said. A particular student, who has always been a teachers’ favorite, very surprisingly, had an opposing view. He posted, in capital letters on the chat, rather passively, “I DO NOT BELIEVE WE CAN REFER TO ELECTED REPRESENTATTIVES AS SLAVES. THIS IS JUST A PERSONAL OPINION.”

I agreed with him on the chat box and until the end of the class the chat box was still buzzing with a truckload of messages. The teacher, who was very busy teaching vulnerable students her view did not view the chat box until the next day and for the next twenty minutes we had to listen to her go on and on about how the political system in India is a circus and how “everyone” is corrupt.

Honestly speaking, this teacher had been one of my favorites so far and she thoroughly liked my responses and appreciated me on numerous fronts, so it was very hard to see someone skilled like her, go rogue, especially on such a political topic. The teacher had been very different than other social science teachers I had come across.

While other teachers would read out of the textbook and then leave the class, this teacher was different. I distinctly remember, she always used to start the class with a question and end it with one that would hit you hard. She loved asking hard hitting questions and would often debate us on our own answers, either proving them wrong or illogical. We would them argue back, supporting the fact that our answer is valid. This unique way of conducting classes was really admired by not only myself but students across classes.

However, the past few days have not even minutely reflected the description of her classes I offered. Her questions are now very opinion based and tilted and she focuses putting on the table, her views and opinions as opposed to the wide range of content available in our textbook.

I thought, the next day she would realize that she wasn’t supposed to teach her opinion in class and apologize. But boy I couldn’t be more wrong!