Should our constitution be termed as a secular constitution when it unleashes discrimination against Hindus? Read these two articles who stand firmly against Indic resurgence and are Anti-Hindu by their very nature.
The rosy ideas of tolerance, secularism, harmony, unity need to be protected. There is a logical fallacy here. These rosy ideas were meant to create an ideal society but they have failed to do so. Why did they fail to do so?
The fusion of religion and politics happened for the first time when MK Gandhi fused together a purely Nationalist political movement of Non-Cooperation with a purely religious movement of Khilafat - It has always puzzled me as to why a purely religious movement was amalgamated with a Nationalist movement.
Recently an incident took place in Mathura wherein few Islamic followers offered “Namaaz” inside the temple premises without the permission of priest therein.
If we look the legality of secular and socialist words in terms of constitution and constitution related cases we find that in two scenarios- 42th amendment in which secular and socialist words in preamble can legally be challenged.
Introduction
21st century has thrown up myriad challenges to humanity. The very character of the human psyche is that of ‘one-upmanship’. Everyone wants to outdo...
The country needs to wake up from this noxious religious opium which these parties are giving since the independence. Especially the liberal youth who try to prove everybody wrong, should start acting like real seculars instead of being some politically controlled puppets.