Tuesday, August 11, 2020
Home Opinions Can we boycott Chinese in India?

Can we boycott Chinese in India?

Also Read

 

Sonam Wangchuk, the Ladakhi engineer, innovator and education reformist, has called for #BoycottMadeInChina #SoftwareInAWeekHardwareInAYear via Twitter and YouTube and urged all Indians including his millions of followers to use their wallet power to hit the Chinese economy. This comes in a response to increased Chinese hostility on the Indo-China border and increasing Chinese incursions on the Indian territory in Ladakh.

Wangchuk advocates cooperation of the general public for economic boycott of Chinese products and services to complement the bullet power of the Indian army. Soon after his videos surfaced, various trends went viral encouraging Indians to uninstall Chinese apps from  their mobile phones. Apps like ‘Remove China Apps’ that helped identify and uninstall Chinese origin mobile applications were downloaded in millions. There is rising debate over Wangchuk’s call with a large section of Indians relating with the emotion while another section of usual suspects mocking and abusing Wangchuk for his appeal.

Rajdeep Sardesai claimed that the ‘Statue of Unity’ built in Kevadia, Gujarat was in fact ‘Made in China’ and later deleted the tweet when the lie was busted by Twitter users.
(Image source: https://www.opindia.com/2020/05/rajdeep-sardesai-tweets-lie-that-statue-of-unity-is-made-in-china/)

The nationalistic idea is inspiring and natural given how China has always used its economic might to push their diplomatic assertion on sovereign foreign territories. However, India foremost needs to strengthen its manufacturing sector, which has been long ignored for the past 12-15 years, if we want to become self reliant and lead some economic leverage over enemy states. An economic movement like such, how-so-ever well motivated, cannot achieve its desired goals unless supported by a local industry which can produce quality products at competitive prices. Government initiatives such as Make In India and Atma Nirbhar Bharat have aimed at this issue precisely. While Make In India could not pick up the pace it aspired for, Atma Nirbhar Bharat will have its own challenges in the COVID and post-COVID era.

The prime minister said five ‘Is’ are important for self-reliant India: Intent, Inclusion, Investment, Infrastructure, Innovation.
(Image source: https://indianexpress.com/article/business/economy/pm-narendra-modi-self-reliant-cii-annual-session-2020-6439770/)

One might uninstall a few apps like Zoom and ShareIt and probably purchase a Samsung to avoid buying China-made Redmi or Oppo. How long could this work? Are we in a state to minimize our imports drastically? In an open market like India, Chinese hegemony can only be countered with multitude of made-in-India alternatives. Ultimately, prices guide the market share for a lot many products. The government will do its job of bringing out appropriate reforms and schemes giving ignition and opportunities to the industry. Few states like Uttar Pradesh have already taken major steps. Long term benefits are certain. The pressing question, however, still remains – how can we help, meanwhile?

Public sentiment is more powerful than ever in today’s politics. We have seen government policy-making influenced and decisions swayed based on popular public opinion. We have also witnessed governments bowing down to unjust opposition demands channeled via riots and protests. The mood of the public that is dominantly visible in the larger social space through social media trends, public debates, and news platforms can encourage or discourage any government action. Nobody wants to dampen their voter base.

Left ecosystem has often employed protests and incredible violence to achieve their ends
(Image source: https://www.livemint.com/Opinion/K7BtzvPYmyO0KlDn21iixH/How-to-break-the-back-of-Indias-Leftwing-ecosystem.html)

In the coming days, when we can move beyond Coronavirus and the next wave of anti-government rioting, the anti-development poverty-loving lobbies would in high probability start pushing their agenda against industrial development in India. Narratives around the environment, labor laws, and the futility of important government projects are already being built for dissuading the government from pursuing its objective. Congress-ruled Chhattisgarh took the lead and barred its population from contributing towards J&K civil infrastructural projects. Remember, government expenditure on infrastructure is one of the biggest allures for the industry.

 

Do not fall for any such trap which undermines the importance of manufacturing boost in India. Do not pay any heed to any anti-development agenda. After all, there are many who benefit simply because their votebank remains poor. Look out for and beware of propaganda of all those who are still rooting for riots, strikes and bandhs in the country. On an individual’s part, one can simply try to prioritize local over foreign wherever feasible and affordable.

  Support Us  

OpIndia is not rich like the mainstream media. Even a small contribution by you will help us keep running. Consider making a voluntary payment.

Trending now

Latest News

The curious case of Shah Faesal

Shah Faesal, is a UPSC civil services topper and a staunch campaigner of Pakistan sponsored "Kashmiriyat" and vocal anti-Indian.

Covid opens up urban development challenge, how we respond to it, is up to us

This is the time when we should start focusing on creating employment opportunities in tier 3 and tier 4 cities and even in rural areas, so people can find the employment near their homes and don’t need to migrate to metros in search of employment.

Job data; faster PM Narendra Modi acts on it, the better: It should also capture migrants’ data

Transparency and availability of data was a big hallmark of Narendra Modi 1.0 government, with various information available on dashboard and a click of a button, similarly this would be a game changing achievement for Narendra Modi 2.0.

Law against fake news is need of the hour: Media can’t hide anymore behind the freedom of speech

Article 19.1.a b which deals with freedom of speech and expression is universally applicable to all the citizens, including journalists. There is no special provision under the constitution for freedom of speech to the media.

Why Ram Mandir

generation or two, Bharatiyas have resisted, sacrificed and survived one invasion after another. The reclaiming of this ancient site and building a grand temple is a civilization accepting the challenge of the competing invasive cultures and declaring in one voice that we are here to stay.

Awakening of the sleeping Hindu giant

An Ode to the Resurrection of the Hindu self-esteem & pride.

Recently Popular

सामाजिक भेदभाव: कारण और निवारण

भारत में व्याप्त सामाजिक असामानता केवल एक वर्ग विशेष के साथ जिसे कि दलित कहा जाता है के साथ ही व्यापक रूप से प्रभावी है परंतु आर्थिक असमानता को केवल दलितों में ही व्याप्त नहीं माना जा सकता।

Two nation theory after independence

Two Nation Theory was the basis of partition of India. Partition was accepted based on the assumption that the Muslims staying back in India because they rejected the Two Nation theory. However, later decades proved that Two Nation Theory is not only subscribed by a large section of Indian Muslims but also being nourished by the appeasement politics.

The story of Lord Jagannath and Krishna’s heart

But do we really know the significance of this temple and the story behind the incomplete idols of Lord Jagannath, Lord Balabhadra and Maa Shubhadra?

Are Indian history text books really biased?

Contributions of many dynasties, kings and kingdoms find no mention in our text books. Post independence history is also not adequately covered in our text books.

Striking similarities between the death of Parveen Babi and Sushant Singh Rajput: A mere co-incidence or well planned murders?

Together Rhea and Bhatt’s media statements subtly and cleverly project Sushant as some kind of a nut job like Parveen Babi, another Bhatt conjuring.
Advertisements