Saturday, January 23, 2021
Home Opinions Recent Supreme Court judgement on Ayodhya is welcome, but there are questions on others

Recent Supreme Court judgement on Ayodhya is welcome, but there are questions on others

Also Read

G Indira
Author of the book: The India I Know and of Hinduism. Publications in -charge Pragna Bharati Organisation, Hyderabad. Academician and free-lancer

The Supreme Court CJI (Chief Justice of India), Deepak Mishra at the fag-end of his career delivered three-historic yet controversial verdicts, making him remember in the annals of Indian history forever to come.  The -1994-Ayodhya- mosque case, whether the mosque is mandated by the community for prayer or not, was over-ruled paving the way for an uninterrupted and unmitigated arguments on the title suit.

As is in the case of eminent domain Law, that is practised in other progressive western countries, Indian government has also every right to acquire the land of Ayodhya disputed site. Now the road is smoothened for arguments in the case of temple issue, the age-old dispute may be resolved hopefully before the 2019 parliamentary elections. That will give relief for the government and the people to work towards day-to-day issues of progress and development.

The judgement on -Section 497 of IPC– ‘Adultery no longer a criminal offence’ is a bit worrisome. It indicates that we are moving towards westernisation of India. I agree that a part of modern India is westernised but not the whole India in its entirety. The judges have made the section 497 from criminal to civil offence. Criminal is more coercive they might have thought in their wisdom as is in the case of section 377 of IPC (i.e LGBT rights).

As per all religions, Adultery is a sin. Marriage stands on edifice of faith between the married couple. Indian ethos is for ‘self-control or self-restraint’ not for ‘self-gratification or self-indulgence’. The courts go by the egalitarian principle of gender-justice. They are of the view that the Indian man treats his wife as “chattel” i.e his property like any other object. As a matter of fact, on the contrary, it is true of a woman also. A wife doesn’t permit her husband to do adultery or to have any illicit-relationships. She has law on her side to control.

Now with this judgement both are not bound by any restrictions to have adulterous relationships. That means we are moving into an open-society! The judges went by the syntax of law in imparting equality of gender, rather than the spirit of the country where marriage is sacrosanct. Now it has become a flimsy contract. Even in the case of Sabarimala Aiyyappa temple their stand was the same- ‘gender equality’.

However, Indians go by more of conventions than the laws made. A Law works only as a deterrent and a recourse when controversies arise. The resilience of Indian people that has survived their customs, practises and traditions from time to time though there were onslaughts on them will hopefully remain after these changes also, is the belief of many.

The dissent judgement is found to be more interesting in the Sabarimala case than the assent. I would go by what Indu Malhotra, the woman-Judge and what she had to say on the Sabarimalla in her dissent-judgement. She says: “Issues of deep religious sentiments should not be ordinarily be interfered by the court. The Sabarimala shrine and the deity are protected by Article 25 of the Constitution of India and the religious practices cannot be solely tested on the basis of Article 14.”

“Notions of rationality cannot be invoked in matters of religion,” said Justice Malhotra, adding: “What constitutes essential religious practice is for the religious community to decide, not for the court. India is a diverse country. Constitutional morality would allow all to practise their beliefs. The court should not interfere unless if there is any aggrieved person from that section or religion.”

“Present judgment won’t be limited to Sabarimala, it will have wide ramifications. Issues of deep religious sentiments shouldn’t be ordinarily interfered into,” said Justice Malhotra further.

She also said that “Religious practices can’t solely be tested on the basis of the right to equality. It’s up to the worshippers, not the court to decide what’s religion’s essential practice.”

In the sensitive matter of Sabarimalla, the government of the day should have taken the referendum of Hindu women, at least, online rather than to be decided by the Apex Court.

  Support Us  

OpIndia is not rich like the mainstream media. Even a small contribution by you will help us keep running. Consider making a voluntary payment.

Trending now

G Indira
Author of the book: The India I Know and of Hinduism. Publications in -charge Pragna Bharati Organisation, Hyderabad. Academician and free-lancer

Latest News

The historic and hopeful January 20, 2021

Let January 20 serve as a stark reminder for the world at large that the democracy may have been halted temporarily but it has returned with greater hope and not fear.

खालसा पंथ की सिरजना के पीछे का ध्येय और गुरु गोबिंद सिंह जी

गुरु गोबिंद सिंह जी द्वारा स्थापित खालसा पंथ और उनकी बलिदानी परंपरा के महात्म्य को समझने के लिए हमें तत्कालीन धार्मिक-सामाजिक-राजनीतिक पृष्ठभूमि और परिस्थितियों पर विचार करना होगा।

कश्मीरी हिन्दूओ का नरसंहार और 31 साल का इंतजार

19 जनवरी 1990 का वो दिन कोई भी कश्मीरी हिन्दू कभी नहीं भूल सकता। 19 जनवरी 1990 का वो दिन न सिर्फ भारत के लिए बल्कि पूरे विश्व के लिए एक काला दिन है।

धार्मिक आतंकवाद

समाज का एक धड़ा है जो कि शकुनि और मंथरा से भी लाखों गुना कपटी और क्रूर है, जो धर्मनिपेक्षता, उदारवादिता और बुद्धिजीविता का नक़ली मुखौटा लगाये आपकी मानकिसकता पर क़ब्ज़ा कर आपके आत्मसम्मान और पहचान को अपंग बनाये बैठा है।

Tale of India’s greatest test victory in Australia

Finally the Indian flag hung around one of the unbreached fortresses at Gabba. The haughtiness which Australians displayed on the field was put down to dust by fearless Indians.

USA is now a constitutional relic & not a republic

All the founders of the US Constitution and even our own framers from the Constituent Assembly must be squirming in their graves, on what is playing out in the US.

Recently Popular

Daredevil of Indian Army: Para SF Major Mohit Sharma’s who became Iftikaar Bhatt to kill terrorists

Such brave souls of Bharat Mata who knows every minute of their life may become the last minute.

Taj Mahal Secrets (part-2)

Some unexplainedfacts of Taj Mahal

5 Cases where True Indology exposed Audrey Truschke

Her claims have been busted, but she continues to peddle her agenda

गुप्त काल को स्वर्ण युग क्यों कहा जाता है

एक सफल शासन की नींव समुद्रगप्त ने अपने शासनकाल में ही रख दी थी इसीलिए गुप्त सम्राटों का शासन अत्यधिक सफल रहा। साम्राज्य की दृढ़ता शांति और नागरिकों की उन्नति इसके प्रमाण थे।

Girija Tickoo murder: Kashmir’s forgotten tragedy

her dead body was found roadside in an extremely horrible condition, the post-mortem reported that she was brutally gang-raped, sodomized, horribly tortured and cut into two halves using a mechanical saw while she was still alive.