Wednesday, March 3, 2021
Home Opinions This statement of PM Modi on industrialists that no govt has dared to make...

This statement of PM Modi on industrialists that no govt has dared to make so far, has the utmost pertinence

Also Read

anujaggarwal
Anuj is a final year law student at Delhi University awaiting his results. He has frequently contributed Op-ed to numerous forums such as Organiser, OpIndia, Pragyata and often writes blogs on economic and policy issues at Swatantraopinion.wordpress.com. In his free time, he likes to read books on economics, politics, and culture.

The Prime Minister while speaking at the launch of various development projects in Lucknow on Sunday, made a noteworthy comment that should have been uttered by yester prime ministers long ago. He essentially claimed to be a politician not afraid of standing beside industrialists. He also asserted that they have an equal share in the growth and development of the country as compared to any farmer or a banker. A statement that is apparent and incontestable. Yet, it took about six decades for a prime minister to be able to make it albeit with still pending repercussions of opposition hoping to twist it.

This is because unfortunately for us, our nation developed with a misguided perception of ‘Original Sin’ for industrialists. The government convinced itself and then its people, to view industrialists with suspicion. It convinced the people to consider their profits as fruits of corruption, their wealth a result of colluded loot and their properties, an organised land-grab. Thereafter, in the garb of this manufactured perception, it became imperative to control this greedy capitalist class. In effect, the economy was burdened with price controls, quotas, licenses, permits, ceilings and restrictions. All this was done to ensure that the rich don’t get any richer and the poor gets his fair share of resources.

However, merely harbouring good intentions don’t culminate in better outcomes. The net result of this governmental strangulation of the market was that the people who had the means, ability and resources to wade through these restrictions were able to sail through. In return, they left a grotesque machinery, a kind of parallel economy, where the writ of bribes, kickbacks and payoffs ran large. It did put a strain on their business but not on their wealth. It ensured that no new person gets to be a part of this club with governmentally granted exclusivity. Occasionally, an Ambani managed to trick the system but for the most parts it was rigidly restricted and rejected any aspirants with good ideas.

This nation’s tallest industrialist bears a testimony to this; J.D.R Tata continuously and painstakingly tried to convince Pandit Nehru and Indira Gandhi to mend their economic follies but was throughout told to zip it. He was thoroughly rewarded for his pieces of advice by having his Air India, Air India International and insurance outfit nationalised by the government. Meanwhile, we lost valuable time and essentially went backwards. Taking the example of Tata again, it used to manufacture armoured vehicles before independence but thereafter defence was taken out of the private sector’s domain. The result is India is still one of the largest importers of defence hardware in the world and yet struggles to adequately equip the armed forces. The tendency to distrust, demonize and defame the industrial class has cost us decades of development.

The previous UPA government relapsed in this self-perpetuated tendency with the horror of retrospective taxation. There are visible signs of UPA submitting to it again with no reasonable economic thought ever being put forward by the Gandhi Scion. It is, therefore, refreshing to have a politician speaking for industrialist and not casting the habitual suspicion as with mindless ‘Suit-boot’ jibes. This aggressive defence of the industrial class could guide India’s economic destiny for the coming years.

  Support Us  

OpIndia is not rich like the mainstream media. Even a small contribution by you will help us keep running. Consider making a voluntary payment.

Trending now

anujaggarwal
Anuj is a final year law student at Delhi University awaiting his results. He has frequently contributed Op-ed to numerous forums such as Organiser, OpIndia, Pragyata and often writes blogs on economic and policy issues at Swatantraopinion.wordpress.com. In his free time, he likes to read books on economics, politics, and culture.

Latest News

Recently Popular

गुप्त काल को स्वर्ण युग क्यों कहा जाता है

एक सफल शासन की नींव समुद्रगप्त ने अपने शासनकाल में ही रख दी थी इसीलिए गुप्त सम्राटों का शासन अत्यधिक सफल रहा। साम्राज्य की दृढ़ता शांति और नागरिकों की उन्नति इसके प्रमाण थे।

सामाजिक भेदभाव: कारण और निवारण

भारत में व्याप्त सामाजिक असामानता केवल एक वर्ग विशेष के साथ जिसे कि दलित कहा जाता है के साथ ही व्यापक रूप से प्रभावी है परंतु आर्थिक असमानता को केवल दलितों में ही व्याप्त नहीं माना जा सकता।

The story of Lord Jagannath and Krishna’s heart

But do we really know the significance of this temple and the story behind the incomplete idols of Lord Jagannath, Lord Balabhadra and Maa Shubhadra?

India’s Stockholm syndrome

The first leaders of independent India committed greater injustice in 60 years than the British or the Islamists in all of history by audaciously ignoring the power to reset the course to the future of the country; the cowards succumbed to selfishness and what I can only ascribe to the Stockholm Syndrome.

वर्ण व्यवस्था और जाति व्यवस्था के मध्य अंतर और हमारे इतिहास के साथ किया गया खिलवाड़

वास्तव में सनातन में जिस वर्ण व्यवस्था की परिकल्पना की गई उसी वर्ण व्यवस्था को छिन्न भिन्न करके समाज में जाति व्यवस्था को स्थापित कर दिया गया। समस्या यह है कि आज वर्ण और जाति को एक समान माना जाता है जिससे समस्या लगातार बढ़ती जा रही है।