Thursday, August 13, 2020
Home Opinions Why triple talaq is unconstitutional: A legal perspective

Why triple talaq is unconstitutional: A legal perspective

Also Read

 

Recently on the question of the constitutional validity of triple talaq and polygamous marriage, the Honourable Supreme Court (SC) has framed an issue “Whether personal laws are law within the meaning of Art 13 (1) of the Constitution of India”. In a number of earlier decisions, the SC has held that personal laws are not law within the meaning of Art. 13(1).

My humble opinion is that the view of the SC as stated above is not correct. The SC has proceeded on the premise that Art. 13(1) is the source of the protection of fundamental rights whereas the truth is that Art. 13 is not the source but merely an expression of the protection. To put it in simple words, imagine that Art. 13 was not present at all in Part III of the Constitution. In that case, could any law or law in force contravene or be inconsistent with the provisions of part III of the Constitution? The answer is simple, that the constitution is supreme and all laws are subject to the provisions of the Constitution.

To give an example, if the Parliament makes a law on a matter included in the State List of the 7th Schedule then such a law is unconstitutional. Art. 13 protects Part III from violation. However, there is no other article which protects the remaining parts of the Constitution. Yet, all parts of the Constitution are protected from contravention or violation.

Personal laws confer certain rights and obligations on individuals which are enforceable in the court of law. There is absolutely no reason to give such laws a primacy over the sacrosanct and supreme provisions of our Constitution. Moreover, The Shariat Act 1937 makes the Muslim personal law or Sharia applicable to Muslims. That gives personal law of Muslims a statutory recognition. Hence, it will come within the term “all laws in force” in Article 13(3) of the Constitution.

The definition of Law & Law in force in Art.13(3) is an inclusive definition and not an exhaustive one. Having regard to the sacrosanct nature of the fundamental rights it will be odious to hold that it was the intention of the framers of the Constitution to exclude the personal laws of any religion from the purview of the fundamental rights. Even the freedom of religion under Art.25 is not absolute, being subject to public order, health and morality. Further, the provisions of the Muslim personal law in criminal matters have long been abolished with no complaints from the community. Hence the only point for consideration remains as to whether arbitrary triple talaq and allowing 4 wives to Muslim males and denying the same right to Muslim female are violation of Articles 14 and 15 and 21 of the Constitution of India. As far as Art.25 is concerned these two rights of talaq and polygamy in favour of Muslim males are not the essential tenets of Islam.

To sum up, our Constitution is Sovereign, Supreme and Sacrosanct. There is nothing that can go against the provisions of the Constitution. The fundamental rights provided in the Constitution can only be curtailed to the extent expressly provided in the Constitution. Triple talaq gives the husband an arbitrary right to get rid of his marriage, for which he need not assign any reason whatsoever. This amounts to a violation of the Muslim woman’s right to live with dignity which is guaranteed to her under Article 21 of the Constitution. Hence, triple talaq is unconstitutional and needs to be struck down by the Honorable Supreme Court of India.

  Support Us  

OpIndia is not rich like the mainstream media. Even a small contribution by you will help us keep running. Consider making a voluntary payment.

Trending now

Latest News

The curious case of Shah Faesal

Shah Faesal, is a UPSC civil services topper and a staunch campaigner of Pakistan sponsored "Kashmiriyat" and vocal anti-Indian.

Covid opens up urban development challenge, how we respond to it, is up to us

This is the time when we should start focusing on creating employment opportunities in tier 3 and tier 4 cities and even in rural areas, so people can find the employment near their homes and don’t need to migrate to metros in search of employment.

Job data; faster PM Narendra Modi acts on it, the better: It should also capture migrants’ data

Transparency and availability of data was a big hallmark of Narendra Modi 1.0 government, with various information available on dashboard and a click of a button, similarly this would be a game changing achievement for Narendra Modi 2.0.

Law against fake news is need of the hour: Media can’t hide anymore behind the freedom of speech

Article 19.1.a b which deals with freedom of speech and expression is universally applicable to all the citizens, including journalists. There is no special provision under the constitution for freedom of speech to the media.

Why Ram Mandir

generation or two, Bharatiyas have resisted, sacrificed and survived one invasion after another. The reclaiming of this ancient site and building a grand temple is a civilization accepting the challenge of the competing invasive cultures and declaring in one voice that we are here to stay.

Awakening of the sleeping Hindu giant

An Ode to the Resurrection of the Hindu self-esteem & pride.

Recently Popular

सामाजिक भेदभाव: कारण और निवारण

भारत में व्याप्त सामाजिक असामानता केवल एक वर्ग विशेष के साथ जिसे कि दलित कहा जाता है के साथ ही व्यापक रूप से प्रभावी है परंतु आर्थिक असमानता को केवल दलितों में ही व्याप्त नहीं माना जा सकता।

Avrodh: the web-series that looks more realistic and closer to the truth!

The web-series isn't about the one Major who lead the attack, its actually about the strike and the events that lead to it, Major was a part of a big picture like others who fought alongside him, the snipers, the national security advisor so on and so forth.

The story of Lord Jagannath and Krishna’s heart

But do we really know the significance of this temple and the story behind the incomplete idols of Lord Jagannath, Lord Balabhadra and Maa Shubhadra?

Striking similarities between the death of Parveen Babi and Sushant Singh Rajput: A mere co-incidence or well planned murders?

Together Rhea and Bhatt’s media statements subtly and cleverly project Sushant as some kind of a nut job like Parveen Babi, another Bhatt conjuring.

Two nation theory after independence

Two Nation Theory was the basis of partition of India. Partition was accepted based on the assumption that the Muslims staying back in India because they rejected the Two Nation theory. However, later decades proved that Two Nation Theory is not only subscribed by a large section of Indian Muslims but also being nourished by the appeasement politics.
Advertisements